- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT02592525
Implementing Shared Decision Making in Interprofessional Home Care Teams (IPSDM-SW)
Implementing Shared Decision Making in Interprofessional Home Care Teams : a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
This study will train health providers in home care teams across Quebec in shared decision making about the decision to stay at home or move to another location. This decision is one of the toughest for older Canadians. Decisions that are informed, shared and supported produce better results. An interprofessional approach to shared decision making is when older persons and their caregivers are supported by not just one but by all the professionals involved in their care.The impact of the training program in interprofessional shared decision making (IPSDM) above that of the passive dissemination of a decision guide will be assessed by measuring to what extent older persons caregivers say they took active part in the decision-making process.
Other outcome measures will be:
i) what option they chose, whether they feel conflict or regret about their decision, and the burden of care they feel; ii) the quality of life of clients;
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Quebec
-
Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1J 0A4
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL)
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Enfant
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
Clients or caregivers of clients :
- Aged ≥65 years;
- Receiving care from the IP home care team of the enrolled CISSS/CIUSSS
- Have made a decision about whether to stay at home or move to another location during the recruitment periods
- Are able to read, understand and write French or English
- Can give informed consent
In the case clients are not able to provide informed consent, their caregiver will be eligible.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clients who are not able to provide informed consent and who don't have a caregiver
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Cluster A
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 4 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
|
Expérimental: Cluster B
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 11 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
|
Expérimental: Cluster C
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 18 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
|
Expérimental: Cluster D
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 25 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Assumed Role in decision making
Délai: 7 months
|
To assess the proportion of caregivers reporting an active role, a modified version of the Control Preferences Scale designed to assess the role assumed in the decision making process will be used.
The scale consists of a single question and is the one most frequently used in studies assessing the implementation of SDM in clinical practice.
|
7 months
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient involvement in decision making
Délai: 7 months
|
Assessed with the Dyadic-OPTION scale, a 12-item self-administered instrument that assesses 12 specific SDM behaviours during the decision-making process
|
7 months
|
|
Decisional Regret
Délai: 7 months
|
Assessed with the Decisional Regret Scale
|
7 months
|
|
Decisional Conflict
Délai: 7 months
|
Assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale
|
7 months
|
|
Health-related quality of life
Délai: 7 months
|
Assessed with two subscales (Social isolation and Emotional reactions) of the HR-QoL questionnaire from the Nottingham Health Profile, clients only
|
7 months
|
|
Burden of care
Délai: 7 months
|
Assessed with the Zarit Burden Inventory Scale (ZBI), caregivers only
|
7 months
|
|
Preferred and chosen option (remain at home or move to another location)
Délai: 7 months
|
Questionnaire assessing the prefered and chosen option
|
7 months
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: France Légaré, Ph. D., Laval University
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Adisso EL, Taljaard M, Stacey D, Briere N, Zomahoun HTV, Durand PJ, Rivest LP, Legare F. Shared Decision-Making Training for Home Care Teams to Engage Frail Older Adults and Caregivers in Housing Decisions: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. JMIR Aging. 2022 Sep 20;5(3):e39386. doi: 10.2196/39386.
- Legare F, Briere N, Stacey D, Lacroix G, Desroches S, Dumont S, Fraser KD, Rivest LP, Durand PJ, Turcotte S, Taljaard M, Bourassa H, Roy L, Painchaud Guerard G. Implementing shared decision-making in interprofessional home care teams (the IPSDM-SW study): protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e014023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014023.
Liens utiles
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Estimation)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 2015-2016 01-01-E
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .