Physiotherapy in Hypoxic AECOPD Patients
2020年3月2日 更新者：Marie Carmen Valenza、Universidad de Granada
Feasibility and Efficacy of Physiotherapy in Hypoxic AECOPD Patients
Hypoxia is considered a key player in many of the comorbidities that characterize COPD, such as pulmonary hypertension, skeletal muscle dysfunction, and systemic inflammation.
These comorbidities are worsened during an exacerbation due to prolonged bed rest and treatment with steroids, showing a reduction in the quality of life, exercise tolerance, and a greater risk of death in these patients.
Therefore, a better understanding of the safety and effectiveness of exercise training for AECOPD patients with resting hypoxemia is needed.
調査の概要
状態
わからない
条件
研究の種類
介入
入学 (予想される)
36
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Granada
-
Granada.、Granada、スペイン、18071
- 募集
- Faculty of Health Sciences. University of Granada.
-
コンタクト：
- Marie Carmen Valenza, PT
- 電話番号：958 248035
- メール：cvalenza@ugr.es
-
主任研究者：
- Marie Carmen Valenza, PT, PhD
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
40年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of both sexes
- A diagnosis of COPD made according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society (ATS)
- With hypoxemia at rest defined as mean arterial oxygen saturation below 90%
- Agreed to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unstable cardiovascular disease
- Orthopedic diseases in the upper and lower limbs
- Being in ICU or use of mechanical ventilation
- Motor sequelae from a neurological or cognitive impairment that interfere with the evaluation and the treatment
- Contraindications of electrotherapy
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Global Exercise Group
all patients received the Control Group treatment added to global exercise treatment.
The program included 15 minutes of deep breathing exercises and 20-30 minutes of limb exercises.
The exercises included global active range of motion (ROM) exercises and muscle strengthening like upper and lower limbs flexion-extension do single-leg stance, and sit to stand exercises.
The number of repetitions was adapted to the subject's response taken into account the perceived dyspnea and fatigue during the exercise performance.
|
The program included 15 minutes of deep breathing exercises and 20-30 minutes of limb exercises.
The exercises included global active range of motion (ROM) exercises and muscle strengthening like upper and lower limbs flexion-extension do single-leg stance, and sit to stand exercises
|
|
実験的：Functional Electrostimulation Group
all patients received the Control Group treatment plus neuromuscular stimulation therapy (SEFAR Rehab X2, DJO France S.A.S., France) on quadriceps accompanied by lower limb exercises. The intervention was performed following the protocol described by Valenza et al (2017). Valenza MC, Torres-Sánchez I, López-López L, Cabrera-Martos I, Ortiz-Rubio A, Valenza-Demet G. Effects of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):323-332. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04745-1. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed PMID: 29144103. |
The program included a neuromuscular stimulation therapy on quadriceps accompanied by lower limb exercises. The intervention was performed following the protocol described by Valenza et al (2017). Valenza MC, Torres-Sánchez I, López-López L, Cabrera-Martos I, Ortiz-Rubio A, Valenza-Demet G. Effects of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):323-332. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04745-1. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed PMID: 29144103. |
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Standard treatment
Patients received standard medical and pharmacological care that consisted in systemic steroids, inhaled bronchodilators, oxygen, and a regimen of oral prednisone or its equivalent in doses of 40 to 60 mg per day for the duration of therapy as well as anti-biotic therapy.
|
Patients received standard medical and pharmacological care that consisted in systemic steroids, inhaled bronchodilators, oxygen, and a regimen of oral prednisone or its equivalent in doses of 40 to 60 mg per day for the duration of therapy as well as anti-biotic therapy
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Lower limb strength
時間枠：Baseline
|
Quadriceps strength was assessed with a portable hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, model 01163, Lafayette, IN, USA).
The test was performed with the patient seated with his/her knees and hips flexed at 90°.
Resistance was applied to the anterior tibia during 5 seconds of maximal muscle contraction.
The test was repeated alternatively 3 times on the leg, allowing participants to rest between measurements.
The highest value in Newton was selected for the analysis.
|
Baseline
|
|
Lower limb strength
時間枠：Up to 9 days
|
Quadriceps strength was assessed with a portable hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, model 01163, Lafayette, IN, USA).
The test was performed with the patient seated with his/her knees and hips flexed at 90°.
Resistance was applied to the anterior tibia during 5 seconds of maximal muscle contraction.
The test was repeated alternatively 3 times on the leg, allowing participants to rest between measurements.
The highest value in Newton was selected for the analysis.
|
Up to 9 days
|
|
Balance
時間枠：Baseline
|
Balance was evaluated by the one-leg standing balance test (OLS), that measured the time that the patient balances on one leg as long as possible.
The patient choose a leg to stand on (whichever he felt more comfortable with), flex the opposite knee allowing the foot to clear the floor, and balance on one leg.
Higher values mean better balance.
|
Baseline
|
|
Balance
時間枠：Up to 9 days
|
Balance was evaluated by the one-leg standing balance test (OLS), that measured the time that the patient balances on one leg as long as possible.
The patient choose a leg to stand on (whichever he felt more comfortable with), flex the opposite knee allowing the foot to clear the floor, and balance on one leg.
Higher values mean better balance.
|
Up to 9 days
|
|
Dyspnea
時間枠：Baseline
|
Dyspnea was assessed at rest using the modified Borg scale.
Patients classified their breathlessness from 0 (no dyspnea) to10 (maximal dyspnea)
|
Baseline
|
|
Dyspnea
時間枠：Up to 9 days
|
Dyspnea was assessed at rest using the modified Borg scale.
Patients classified their breathlessness from 0 (no dyspnea) to10 (maximal dyspnea)
|
Up to 9 days
|
|
Fatigue
時間枠：Baseline
|
Fatigue was evaluated using the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) that consists of 22 numerical items which assess multidimensional aspects of fatigue.
The scale measures four dimensions of subjective fatigue: "behavioral/severity", relating to the severity, distress, and degree of disruption in activity of daily living; "affective meaning", relating to the emotional meaning attributed to fatigue; "sensory", relating to the physical symptoms of fatigue; and "cognitive/mood", relating to mental and mood states
|
Baseline
|
|
Fatigue
時間枠：Up to 9 days
|
Fatigue was evaluated using the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) that consists of 22 numerical items which assess multidimensional aspects of fatigue.
The scale measures four dimensions of subjective fatigue: "behavioral/severity", relating to the severity, distress, and degree of disruption in activity of daily living; "affective meaning", relating to the emotional meaning attributed to fatigue; "sensory", relating to the physical symptoms of fatigue; and "cognitive/mood", relating to mental and mood states
|
Up to 9 days
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2019年12月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2020年1月1日
研究の完了 (予想される)
2020年4月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2020年2月17日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2020年3月2日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2020年3月4日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2020年3月4日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2020年3月2日
最終確認日
2020年3月1日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。