Reliability and Validity of a New Postoperative Track Assessment Tool (POTraTool)
Reliability and Validity of a New Postoperative Track Assessment Tool - a Prospective Observational Study
調査の概要
詳細な説明
The tool includes 2 visual analog scale (VAS) scores estimating indication of an IMC admission and benefit of an IMC stay. The tool was tested in a PACU and in an IMC unit of a Swiss tertiary centre in 2019/2020 (before COVID pandemic). Three raters: one nurse, one physician in charge and the consultant physician, were asked to fill the VAS at the same time for each included patient. The score was done in the 2 first hours following admission in the unit and during the multi professional morning round at day 1.
Reliability was estimated by testing internal consistency (homogeneity), interrater reliability and agreement and test-retest validity (stability). Validity included content validity, construct validity and criterion validity.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Geneva、スイス、1205
- Geneva University Hospital
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
This study was a random sample from the PACU and IMC patients' population. Included patients' variables for demographic description of the population of interest and for the validity testing were: Age in years, gender (male / female), ASA physical score classification (ASA PS), do not resuscitate order (DNR), duration of intervention (min), severity of intervention (minor/intermediate/major), type of surgery (abdominal, orthopedic, trauma and other surgical and non-surgical interventions), elective or non-elective, palliative intervention, SAPS II (admission (2 h after arrival in IMC)), NEMS (admission (2 h after arrival) and during stay in IMC), SAS.
Participating raters were voluntary health care providers working in the peri-interventional unit (PACU and IMC).
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- PACU patients admitted on Mondays
- IMC patients admitted 7:30am-7:30pm on weekdays
Exclusion Criteria:
- night admission
- PACU patient ASA < 3 or minor intervention
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Intermediate Care (IMC) indication (VASi)
時間枠：2019/2020
|
Health care raters graded the IMC indication (or allocative efficiency) for each patient on a visual analog scale grading from 0 (very low indication of an IMC management) to 100 (very high indication of an IMC management), namely VASi.
|
2019/2020
|
|
Intermediate Care benefit (VASb)
時間枠：2019/2020
|
Health care raters graded the IMC benefit (or health gain) for each patient on a visual analog scale grading from 0 (very low benefit from an IMC management) to 100 (very high benefit from an IMC management), namely VASb.
|
2019/2020
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- スタディディレクター：Walder, Professor、University Hospital, Geneva
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。