此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅英文版对于源文本。

Reliability and Validity of a New Postoperative Track Assessment Tool (POTraTool)

2021年10月12日更新者：Laurelie Perret、University Hospital, Geneva

Reliability and Validity of a New Postoperative Track Assessment Tool - a Prospective Observational Study

This prospective observational study investigated the validity and reliability of a new postoperative track assessment tool. We hypothesized, first, that this tool estimates the indication and benefit of a management in an intermediate care unit (IMC). Second, we hypothesized that a) health care providers of IMC or postoperative anaesthesia care unit (PACU) have similar estimations using this tool and b) that this estimation is accurately established in the first 2 hours.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

围手术期并发症

干预/治疗

其他：Po Tra tool

详细说明

The tool includes 2 visual analog scale (VAS) scores estimating indication of an IMC admission and benefit of an IMC stay. The tool was tested in a PACU and in an IMC unit of a Swiss tertiary centre in 2019/2020 (before COVID pandemic). Three raters: one nurse, one physician in charge and the consultant physician, were asked to fill the VAS at the same time for each included patient. The score was done in the 2 first hours following admission in the unit and during the multi professional morning round at day 1.

Reliability was estimated by testing internal consistency (homogeneity), interrater reliability and agreement and test-retest validity (stability). Validity included content validity, construct validity and criterion validity.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

879

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

瑞士
- - Geneva、瑞士、1205
    - Geneva University Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

This study was a random sample from the PACU and IMC patients' population. Included patients' variables for demographic description of the population of interest and for the validity testing were: Age in years, gender (male / female), ASA physical score classification (ASA PS), do not resuscitate order (DNR), duration of intervention (min), severity of intervention (minor/intermediate/major), type of surgery (abdominal, orthopedic, trauma and other surgical and non-surgical interventions), elective or non-elective, palliative intervention, SAPS II (admission (2 h after arrival in IMC)), NEMS (admission (2 h after arrival) and during stay in IMC), SAS.

Participating raters were voluntary health care providers working in the peri-interventional unit (PACU and IMC).

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

PACU patients admitted on Mondays
IMC patients admitted 7:30am-7:30pm on weekdays

Exclusion Criteria:

night admission
PACU patient ASA < 3 or minor intervention

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量	措施说明	大体时间
Intermediate Care (IMC) indication (VASi) 大体时间：2019/2020	Health care raters graded the IMC indication (or allocative efficiency) for each patient on a visual analog scale grading from 0 (very low indication of an IMC management) to 100 (very high indication of an IMC management), namely VASi.	2019/2020
Intermediate Care benefit (VASb) 大体时间：2019/2020	Health care raters graded the IMC benefit (or health gain) for each patient on a visual analog scale grading from 0 (very low benefit from an IMC management) to 100 (very high benefit from an IMC management), namely VASb.	2019/2020

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

University Hospital, Geneva

调查人员

研究主任：Walder, Professor、University Hospital, Geneva

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2019年8月12日

初级完成 (实际的)

2020年10月19日

研究完成 (实际的)

2020年10月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2021年9月21日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2021年10月12日

首次发布 (实际的)

2021年10月26日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)