Effects of Short Physical Activity Breaks on Thinking Skills After University Lectures in Undergraduate Students
Acute Cognitive Effects of Brief Physical Activity Breaks After Lecture-Based Academic Activity in Undergraduate University Students: A Randomized Crossover Study
The goal of this randomized crossover study is to evaluate whether brief Physical Activity Breaks (PABs), implemented immediately after lecture-based academic activity, can improve attentional processing and executive functioning in undergraduate university students. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do OPAB or PABEx improve attentional and executive performance compared to a no-break control condition (NPAB)? Does PABEx provide superior cognitive benefits compared to OPAB?
Researchers will compare:
OPAB (a standardized 10-minute outdoor walking protocol) PABEx (a 10-minute exergame-based break using Fruit Ninja Kinect)
to see if these interventions improve cognitive performance compared to NPAB (supervised passive seated rest), and whether significant differences in cognitive outcomes emerge between OPAB and PABEx.
Participants will:
Complete cognitive assessments (Trail Making Test A-B and Stroop Color-Word Test) immediately after each condition.
Be randomly assigned, in counterbalanced order, to all three conditions across three consecutive weeks separated by a 7-day washout interval.
Engage in a 10-minute structured break (OPAB or PABEx) or passive rest (NPAB) following two consecutive hours of seated university lectures, including:
Warm-up (2 minutes): low-intensity dynamic movements. Main session (6 minutes): light-to-moderate outdoor walking (OPAB) or Fruit Ninja Kinect exergaming (PABEx).
Cool-down (2 minutes): relaxation and gentle stretching exercises.
This study will provide insights into the efficacy of brief active breaks as a pragmatic strategy to enhance cognitive efficiency in university students during academically demanding periods.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Bari
-
Bari、Bari、イタリア、70123
- Università degli studi di Bari "Aldo Moro"
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- enrolled full-time
- 18-35 years old at the time of data collection
- physically able to stand and perform brief bouts of physical activity safely
Exclusion Criteria:
- musculoskeletal disorders
- current or recent lower-limb injuries
- acute or chronic medical conditions that could limit safe participation in light-to-moderate physical activity
- unable to comply with the study protocol
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：クロスオーバー割り当て
- マスキング：トリプル
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Exergame-based Physical Activity Break (PABEx)
|
The PABEx condition consisted of a 10-minute non-immersive exergaming session structured into three phases: (i) Warm-up (2 min): the same dynamic warm-up used in OPAB.
(ii) Exergame phase (6 min): participants played Fruit Ninja Kinect, standing at approximately 1.5-2.0
m from a television screen and using a Kinect motion-sensing controller to perform rapid upper-limb movements to slice virtual fruit, combining physical engagement with visuomotor coordination and sustained attentional demands.
(iii) Cool-down (2 min): the same relaxation and stretching exercises used in OPAB.
Although duration, game, setting, and instructions were standardized, physiological intensity was not objectively monitored and may have varied across individuals.
Session duration, sequencing, supervision, and timing of cognitive testing were kept constant across all conditions.
|
|
実験的：Outdoor Physical Activity Break (OPAB),
|
The OPAB condition consisted of a standardized 10-minute outdoor protocol structured into three phases: (i) Warm-up (2 min): low-intensity dynamic movements targeting major joints (ankles, knees, hips, and shoulders) combined with light marching in place.
(ii) Walking phase (6 min): participants walked along a predefined outdoor route at approximately 4.5 km·h-¹, providing a light-to-moderate aerobic stimulus; exercise intensity was not objectively monitored.
(iii) Cool-down (2 min): relaxation and gentle stretching exercises targeting lower-limb muscle groups and breathing regulation.
|
|
介入なし：No Physical Activity Break (NPAB)
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Trail Making Test A (TMT-A): Completion time
時間枠：3-weeks
|
Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) assesses visual attention and processing speed. The outcome is the time required to complete the task, measured in seconds. Lower completion times indicate better cognitive performance. Possible scores range from 0 seconds to no predefined maximum value. Unit of Measure Seconds |
3-weeks
|
|
The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT): Completion Time
時間枠：3-weeks
|
The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) assesses selective attention, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control. Participants are required to name the color of visual stimuli and to identify the ink color of color words printed in incongruent colors. The outcome measure is the time required to complete the test, expressed in seconds. Scores range from 0 seconds to no predefined maximum value. Lower scores indicate better cognitive performance. Unit of Measure Seconds |
3-weeks
|
|
Trail Making Test B (TMT-B): Completion Time
時間枠：3-weeks
|
Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) assesses executive function, cognitive flexibility, and set-shifting ability. The outcome is the time required to complete the task, measured in seconds. Lower completion times indicate better cognitive performance. Possible scores range from 0 seconds to no predefined maximum value. Unit of Measure Seconds |
3-weeks
|
|
The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT): Errors
時間枠：3-weeks
|
The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) assesses selective attention, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control. The outcome measure is the number of errors committed during test performance. Scores range from 0 errors to no predefined maximum value. Lower scores indicate better cognitive performance. Unit of Measure Errors |
3-weeks
|
|
Trail Making Test A (TMT-A): Errors
時間枠：3-weeks
|
The Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) assesses visual attention, visual scanning, and processing speed. The outcome measure is the number of errors committed while completing the task. Scores range from 0 errors to no predefined maximum value. Lower scores indicate better cognitive performance. Unit of Measure Errors |
3-weeks
|
|
Trail Making Test B (TMT-B): Errors
時間枠：3-weeks
|
The Trail Making Test B (TMT-B) assesses executive function, cognitive flexibility, and set-shifting ability. The outcome measure is the number of errors committed during task performance. Scores range from 0 errors to no predefined maximum value. Lower scores indicate better cognitive performance. Unit of Measure Errors |
3-weeks
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Luca Poli, P.hd.、University of Bari Aldo Moro
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 116866
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。