The Differential Impact of High-Stakes Versus Routine OSCE Stations on Nursing Students' Stress Levels and Clinical Competency: An Experimental Study
Abstract Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are vital for assessing nursing competence. However, the design of OSCE stations, particularly comparing critical (high-stakes) versus routine (low-stakes) scenarios, may differentially impact student stress and clinical performance. This experimental study compared these effects to inform the optimal design of assessments.
Methods: This 2024 experimental study at Torbat Heydariyeh University randomly assigned 78 final-year nursing students to two groups (n=39 each). The Intervention Group faced a critical CPR station where failure resulted in exam disqualification, while the Control Group faced a standard routine station. Both groups received identical Basic Life Support (BLS) training in accordance with the 2020 AHA guidelines. Outcomes were assessed using: (a) the PSS-10 stress scale (α=0.85); (b) a 20-item BLS knowledge test; and (c) a 17-item CPR skills checklist, with performance metrics (depth, rate, ventilation) recorded objectively by a Laerdal QCPR® manikin. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests and the Mann-Whitney test to achieve 80% power.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Torbat Heydarieh、イラン
- Torbat Heydarieh university of Medical Sciences
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- The inclusion criteria included nursing students in their eighth semester who had given their consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Exclusion criteria were nursing students who were unwilling to participate, absence in any of the intervention sessions, and those who, for reasons such as acute stress, did not have the necessary mental or psychological readiness to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills. Additionally, students taking medications that could attenuate the stress response (e.g., beta-blockers, central nervous system depressants) were also excluded.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：他の
- 割り当て：なし
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
他の：Control-Group
There is routine and non-stakes OSCE in the control-group
|
In this intervention, students had to pass more challenging OSCE in comparison with contol-group
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Stress of students in OSCE exam
時間枠：1 day
|
stress of students was measured by pss-10 questionnaire Stress levels were quantified using the Persian version of PSS-10 (α=0.85),
administered via OSCE.
|
1 day
|
|
BLS knowledge
時間枠：1 day
|
Basic life support knowledge To assess students' knowledge and clinical reasoning in mechanical ventilation, a researcher-developed, mixed-format questionnaire was used.
The tool included 20 items such as multiple-choice questions, clinical scenarios, calculation-based items (e.g., RSBI, ventilator settings), and graphic interpretation tasks.
Content areas covered ventilator modes, complications, alarm settings, ABG analysis, and weaning criteria, designed in alignment with recent guidelines including the American Heart Association (2023).
Content validity was confirmed by six experts in critical care and nursing education (CVI ≥ 0.8).
A pilot test with 30 final-year students demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α= 0.84).
The questionnaire was administered before and after the intervention in both study groups to evaluate learning outcomes.
|
1 day
|
協力者と研究者
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- (IR.THUMS.REC.1402.14026)
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。