The Differential Impact of High-Stakes Versus Routine OSCE Stations on Nursing Students' Stress Levels and Clinical Competency: An Experimental Study
Abstract Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are vital for assessing nursing competence. However, the design of OSCE stations, particularly comparing critical (high-stakes) versus routine (low-stakes) scenarios, may differentially impact student stress and clinical performance. This experimental study compared these effects to inform the optimal design of assessments.
Methods: This 2024 experimental study at Torbat Heydariyeh University randomly assigned 78 final-year nursing students to two groups (n=39 each). The Intervention Group faced a critical CPR station where failure resulted in exam disqualification, while the Control Group faced a standard routine station. Both groups received identical Basic Life Support (BLS) training in accordance with the 2020 AHA guidelines. Outcomes were assessed using: (a) the PSS-10 stress scale (α=0.85); (b) a 20-item BLS knowledge test; and (c) a 17-item CPR skills checklist, with performance metrics (depth, rate, ventilation) recorded objectively by a Laerdal QCPR® manikin. Data were analyzed using independent t-tests and the Mann-Whitney test to achieve 80% power.
Descripción general del estudio
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Torbat Heydarieh, Irán
- Torbat Heydarieh university of Medical Sciences
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Niño
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- The inclusion criteria included nursing students in their eighth semester who had given their consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Exclusion criteria were nursing students who were unwilling to participate, absence in any of the intervention sessions, and those who, for reasons such as acute stress, did not have the necessary mental or psychological readiness to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills. Additionally, students taking medications that could attenuate the stress response (e.g., beta-blockers, central nervous system depressants) were also excluded.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Otro
- Asignación: N / A
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Otro: Control-Group
There is routine and non-stakes OSCE in the control-group
|
In this intervention, students had to pass more challenging OSCE in comparison with contol-group
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Stress of students in OSCE exam
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
stress of students was measured by pss-10 questionnaire Stress levels were quantified using the Persian version of PSS-10 (α=0.85),
administered via OSCE.
|
1 day
|
|
BLS knowledge
Periodo de tiempo: 1 day
|
Basic life support knowledge To assess students' knowledge and clinical reasoning in mechanical ventilation, a researcher-developed, mixed-format questionnaire was used.
The tool included 20 items such as multiple-choice questions, clinical scenarios, calculation-based items (e.g., RSBI, ventilator settings), and graphic interpretation tasks.
Content areas covered ventilator modes, complications, alarm settings, ABG analysis, and weaning criteria, designed in alignment with recent guidelines including the American Heart Association (2023).
Content validity was confirmed by six experts in critical care and nursing education (CVI ≥ 0.8).
A pilot test with 30 final-year students demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α= 0.84).
The questionnaire was administered before and after the intervention in both study groups to evaluate learning outcomes.
|
1 day
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- (IR.THUMS.REC.1402.14026)
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .