Cancer Oriented Understanding and Navigation Via Supportive and Educational Language Models (COUNSEL)
A randomized, open-label behavioral study designed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and early impact of a large language model (LLM)-based artificial intelligence (AI) tool to support patient understanding following an initial oncology consultation.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the impact of a LLM-based intervention on patients' perceived quality, breadth, and depth of cancer-related information following a radiation or surgical oncology consult.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess patient- and provider-perceived levels of shared decision making. II. To evaluate changes in patient-reported distress. III. To compare concordance between patient and provider perceptions of shared decision making.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To identify qualitative themes and usage patterns in patient interactions with the LLM.
II. To evaluate resource utilization based on information-seeking behavior logs collected during follow-up.
OUTLINE: Participants will be randomized to an intervention or control arm. Participants will attend two teleconference meetings: the first within 2 days after an oncology consultation and a follow-up session approximately 21 days later. Participants will also complete study surveys and logs.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究連絡先
- 名前：UCSF Genitourinary Medical Oncology Recruitment
- 電話番号：877-827-3222
- メール：GUTrials@ucsf.edu
研究場所
-
-
California
-
San Francisco、California、アメリカ、94143
- University of California, San Francisco
-
コンタクト：
- UCSF Genitourinary Medical Oncology Recruitment
- 電話番号：877-827-3222
- メール：GUTrials@ucsf.edu
-
主任研究者：
- Julian Hong, MD, MS
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years.
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of localized prostate cancer
- Newly diagnosed and planning to undergo or recently completed a radiation or surgical oncology consult at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
- English-speaking and able to participate in study teleconferences
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document
- Access to a device and internet connection sufficient for teleconference participation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior definitive treatment for prostate cancer (e.g., surgery, radiation, or systemic therapy)
- Cognitive, sensory, or language impairment that would interfere with the ability to understand, participate in, or complete the study procedures
- Inability or unwillingness to participate in two study-related teleconferences
- Current enrollment in another interventional clinical trial that may interfere with study participation
- Inability to comply with protocol requirements (e.g., completing surveys or using the information-tracking log)
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：支持療法
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：Intervention Arm
AI teleconferences with Large Language Model (LLM) interaction |
An AI-guided, interactive educational tool that allows participants to interact with a large language model (LLM) will be delivered via teleconference. Participant and clinicians will complete questionnaires |
|
プラセボコンパレーター：Control Arm
AI teleconferences without LLM interaction |
Participant and clinicians will complete questionnaires |
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean differences on EORTC QLQ-INFO25 - Patient-Perceived Cancer-Related Information
時間枠：Up to 2 days
|
Patient-perceived quality, breadth, and depth of cancer-related information received following an oncology consultation, as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-INFO25) survey. The EORTC QLQ-INFO25 comprises four multi-item scales and eight single items to assess the level and quality of information received by cancer patients. Scores for all scales and single items range from 0-100. The survey uses a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all' to 4 = "very much") and some yes/no questions. Higher scores represent a greater patient-perceived level of shared decision-making. Mean differences between treatment groups will be reported with 95% confidence intervals, along with Hedges' g effect sizes. A Mann-Whitney U test will be used for sensitivity analysis. |
Up to 2 days
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean differences on SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc - Patient- and Provider-Perceived Shared Decision Making
時間枠：Day 21
|
Perceived shared decision making will be assessed from both patient and clinician perspectives using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc), respectively. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), with total scores ranging from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate greater perceived levels of shared decision making from the patient or clinician perspective. Mean differences between groups will be reported using Welch's t-test, along with the 95% confidence intervals. |
Day 21
|
|
Mean differences on NCCN Distress Thermometer - Patient-Reported Distress
時間枠：Up to 21 days
|
Patient-reported distress will be assessed using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer at Day 2 and Day 21. The Distress Thermometer is a single-item measure rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = "No distress" and 10 = "Extreme distress. Mean differences will be reported with 95% confidence intervals, along with Hedges' g effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Descriptive statistics will also be reported. |
Up to 21 days
|
|
Patient-Provider Concordance in Shared Decision Making
時間枠：Day 21
|
Concordance between patient and provider perceptions of shared decision making will be assessed by comparing SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores within each study arm. Concordance will be evaluated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman plots will be used to visualize treatment group differences in concordance. ICC estimates and Bland-Altman plots will be reported. |
Day 21
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Julian Hong, MD, MS、University of California, San Francisco
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 26558
- NCI-2026-06916 (レジストリ識別子：NCI Clinical Trials Reporting System (CTRP))
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。