此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Cancer Oriented Understanding and Navigation Via Supportive and Educational Language Models (COUNSEL)

2026年9月24日 更新者:University of California, San Francisco

A randomized, open-label behavioral study designed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and early impact of a large language model (LLM)-based artificial intelligence (AI) tool to support patient understanding following an initial oncology consultation.

研究概览

详细说明

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To evaluate the impact of a LLM-based intervention on patients' perceived quality, breadth, and depth of cancer-related information following a radiation or surgical oncology consult.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess patient- and provider-perceived levels of shared decision making. II. To evaluate changes in patient-reported distress. III. To compare concordance between patient and provider perceptions of shared decision making.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To identify qualitative themes and usage patterns in patient interactions with the LLM.

II. To evaluate resource utilization based on information-seeking behavior logs collected during follow-up.

OUTLINE: Participants will be randomized to an intervention or control arm. Participants will attend two teleconference meetings: the first within 2 days after an oncology consultation and a follow-up session approximately 21 days later. Participants will also complete study surveys and logs.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

50

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

  • 姓名:UCSF Genitourinary Medical Oncology Recruitment
  • 电话号码:877-827-3222
  • 邮箱:GUTrials@ucsf.edu

学习地点

    • California
      • San Francisco、California、美国、94143
        • University of California, San Francisco
        • 接触:
          • UCSF Genitourinary Medical Oncology Recruitment
          • 电话号码:877-827-3222
          • 邮箱:GUTrials@ucsf.edu
        • 首席研究员:
          • Julian Hong, MD, MS

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years.
  2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of localized prostate cancer
  3. Newly diagnosed and planning to undergo or recently completed a radiation or surgical oncology consult at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
  5. English-speaking and able to participate in study teleconferences
  6. Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document
  7. Access to a device and internet connection sufficient for teleconference participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior definitive treatment for prostate cancer (e.g., surgery, radiation, or systemic therapy)
  2. Cognitive, sensory, or language impairment that would interfere with the ability to understand, participate in, or complete the study procedures
  3. Inability or unwillingness to participate in two study-related teleconferences
  4. Current enrollment in another interventional clinical trial that may interfere with study participation
  5. Inability to comply with protocol requirements (e.g., completing surveys or using the information-tracking log)

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Intervention Arm

AI teleconferences with Large Language Model (LLM) interaction

An AI-guided, interactive educational tool that allows participants to interact with a large language model (LLM) will be delivered via teleconference.

Participant and clinicians will complete questionnaires

安慰剂比较:Control Arm

AI teleconferences without LLM interaction

Participant and clinicians will complete questionnaires

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mean differences on EORTC QLQ-INFO25 - Patient-Perceived Cancer-Related Information
大体时间:Up to 2 days

Patient-perceived quality, breadth, and depth of cancer-related information received following an oncology consultation, as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-INFO25) survey. The EORTC QLQ-INFO25 comprises four multi-item scales and eight single items to assess the level and quality of information received by cancer patients. Scores for all scales and single items range from 0-100. The survey uses a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all' to 4 = "very much") and some yes/no questions. Higher scores represent a greater patient-perceived level of shared decision-making. Mean differences between treatment groups will be reported with 95% confidence intervals, along with Hedges' g effect sizes. A Mann-Whitney U test will be used for sensitivity analysis.

Up to 2 days

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mean differences on SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc - Patient- and Provider-Perceived Shared Decision Making
大体时间:Day 21

Perceived shared decision making will be assessed from both patient and clinician perspectives using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc), respectively. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), with total scores ranging from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate greater perceived levels of shared decision making from the patient or clinician perspective. Mean differences between groups will be reported using Welch's t-test, along with the 95% confidence intervals.

Day 21
Mean differences on NCCN Distress Thermometer - Patient-Reported Distress
大体时间:Up to 21 days

Patient-reported distress will be assessed using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer at Day 2 and Day 21. The Distress Thermometer is a single-item measure rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = "No distress" and 10 = "Extreme distress. Mean differences will be reported with 95% confidence intervals, along with Hedges' g effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Descriptive statistics will also be reported.

Up to 21 days
Patient-Provider Concordance in Shared Decision Making
大体时间:Day 21

Concordance between patient and provider perceptions of shared decision making will be assessed by comparing SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores within each study arm. Concordance will be evaluated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman plots will be used to visualize treatment group differences in concordance. ICC estimates and Bland-Altman plots will be reported.

Day 21

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Julian Hong, MD, MS、University of California, San Francisco

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年10月31日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年11月30日

研究完成 (估计的)

2028年4月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年9月17日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年9月17日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年9月23日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月28日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月24日

最后验证

2026年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅