Cancer Oriented Understanding and Navigation Via Supportive and Educational Language Models (COUNSEL)
A randomized, open-label behavioral study designed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and early impact of a large language model (LLM)-based artificial intelligence (AI) tool to support patient understanding following an initial oncology consultation.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the impact of a LLM-based intervention on patients' perceived quality, breadth, and depth of cancer-related information following a radiation or surgical oncology consult.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess patient- and provider-perceived levels of shared decision making. II. To evaluate changes in patient-reported distress. III. To compare concordance between patient and provider perceptions of shared decision making.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To identify qualitative themes and usage patterns in patient interactions with the LLM.
II. To evaluate resource utilization based on information-seeking behavior logs collected during follow-up.
OUTLINE: Participants will be randomized to an intervention or control arm. Participants will attend two teleconference meetings: the first within 2 days after an oncology consultation and a follow-up session approximately 21 days later. Participants will also complete study surveys and logs.
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: UCSF Genitourinary Medical Oncology Recruitment
- 전화번호: 877-827-3222
- 이메일: GUTrials@ucsf.edu
연구 장소
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, 미국, 94143
- University of California, San Francisco
-
연락하다:
- UCSF Genitourinary Medical Oncology Recruitment
- 전화번호: 877-827-3222
- 이메일: GUTrials@ucsf.edu
-
수석 연구원:
- Julian Hong, MD, MS
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years.
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of localized prostate cancer
- Newly diagnosed and planning to undergo or recently completed a radiation or surgical oncology consult at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2
- English-speaking and able to participate in study teleconferences
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document
- Access to a device and internet connection sufficient for teleconference participation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior definitive treatment for prostate cancer (e.g., surgery, radiation, or systemic therapy)
- Cognitive, sensory, or language impairment that would interfere with the ability to understand, participate in, or complete the study procedures
- Inability or unwillingness to participate in two study-related teleconferences
- Current enrollment in another interventional clinical trial that may interfere with study participation
- Inability to comply with protocol requirements (e.g., completing surveys or using the information-tracking log)
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 지지 요법
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Intervention Arm
AI teleconferences with Large Language Model (LLM) interaction |
An AI-guided, interactive educational tool that allows participants to interact with a large language model (LLM) will be delivered via teleconference. Participant and clinicians will complete questionnaires |
|
위약 비교기: Control Arm
AI teleconferences without LLM interaction |
Participant and clinicians will complete questionnaires |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean differences on EORTC QLQ-INFO25 - Patient-Perceived Cancer-Related Information
기간: Up to 2 days
|
Patient-perceived quality, breadth, and depth of cancer-related information received following an oncology consultation, as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-INFO25) survey. The EORTC QLQ-INFO25 comprises four multi-item scales and eight single items to assess the level and quality of information received by cancer patients. Scores for all scales and single items range from 0-100. The survey uses a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all' to 4 = "very much") and some yes/no questions. Higher scores represent a greater patient-perceived level of shared decision-making. Mean differences between treatment groups will be reported with 95% confidence intervals, along with Hedges' g effect sizes. A Mann-Whitney U test will be used for sensitivity analysis. |
Up to 2 days
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean differences on SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc - Patient- and Provider-Perceived Shared Decision Making
기간: Day 21
|
Perceived shared decision making will be assessed from both patient and clinician perspectives using the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc), respectively. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree), with total scores ranging from 0 to 45. Higher scores indicate greater perceived levels of shared decision making from the patient or clinician perspective. Mean differences between groups will be reported using Welch's t-test, along with the 95% confidence intervals. |
Day 21
|
|
Mean differences on NCCN Distress Thermometer - Patient-Reported Distress
기간: Up to 21 days
|
Patient-reported distress will be assessed using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer at Day 2 and Day 21. The Distress Thermometer is a single-item measure rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 = "No distress" and 10 = "Extreme distress. Mean differences will be reported with 95% confidence intervals, along with Hedges' g effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Descriptive statistics will also be reported. |
Up to 21 days
|
|
Patient-Provider Concordance in Shared Decision Making
기간: Day 21
|
Concordance between patient and provider perceptions of shared decision making will be assessed by comparing SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores within each study arm. Concordance will be evaluated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman plots will be used to visualize treatment group differences in concordance. ICC estimates and Bland-Altman plots will be reported. |
Day 21
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Julian Hong, MD, MS, University of California, San Francisco
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
키워드
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 26558
- NCI-2026-06916 (레지스트리 식별자: NCI Clinical Trials Reporting System (CTRP))
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .