Multimedia Psychoeducation or Print Education in Preparing Cancer Patients for Decision Making About Clinical Trials
2021년 1월 25일 업데이트: Gary Morrow
Evaluation of Psychoeducation for Cancer Patients Eligible for Clinical Trials
This randomized clinical trial compares multimedia psychoeducation to print education in preparing patients with cancer for decision making about clinical trial participation.
Multimedia psychoeducation includes a digital video disc (DVD) and written materials with a combined focus on knowledge and attitude change, and may be an effective method to help patients prepare for decision making about clinical trial participation.
It is not yet known whether a multimedia psychoeducation is more effective than print education in preparing patients for decision making about clinical trials.
연구 개요
상태
완전한
정황
상세 설명
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the effect of intervention assignment on patients' preparedness for decision making about clinical trial participation.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the effect of intervention assignment on indicators of the quality of patients' decision making about clinical trial participation.
II. To examine mechanisms by which multimedia psychoeducation (MP) exerts its expected positive effects on preparedness for decision making.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To explore the effects of intervention assignment on clinical trial participation.
OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Participants undergo a print educational intervention during which they meet with a site coordinator and are instructed to read the National Cancer Institute (NCI) booklet titled Taking Part in Cancer Treatment Studies, comprised primarily of information about the nature and conduct of cancer clinical trials.
ARM II: Participants undergo a multimedia psychoeducational intervention during which they meet with a site coordinator and are instructed to view a digital video disk (DVD) and read a booklet titled Clinical Trials: Are They Right For You? Participants are encouraged to watch the DVD and read the booklet again at home.
After completion of study, patients are followed up at 3-7 and 49-56 days.
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (실제)
418
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, 미국, 92182
- San Diego State University
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, 미국, 33612
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
-
-
Hawaii
-
Honolulu, Hawaii, 미국, 96813
- Hawaii MU-NCORP
-
-
Illinois
-
Decatur, Illinois, 미국, 62526
- Heartland NCORP
-
-
Kansas
-
Prairie Village, Kansas, 미국, 66208
- Kansas City Clinical Oncology Program
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, 미국, 70112
- Gulf South MU-NCORP
-
-
Michigan
-
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 미국, 49503
- Cancer Research Consortium of West Michigan
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 미국, 55426
- Metro MN NCORP
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, 미국, 89106
- Nevada Cancer Research Foundation NCORP
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, 미국, 89106
- Nevada NCORP
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, 미국, 14642
- URCC / University of Rochester NCORP Research Base
-
-
North Carolina
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 미국, 27104
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, 미국, 43215
- Columbus NCORP
-
Dayton, Ohio, 미국, 45420
- Dayton Community Oncology Program
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Danville, Pennsylvania, 미국, 17822
- Geisinger Cancer Institute NCORP
-
-
South Carolina
-
Greenville, South Carolina, 미국, 29615
- Greenville Health System Cancer Instutite/Greenville NCORP
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 미국, 54449
- Wisconsin NCORP
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 미국, 53226
- Aurora NCORP
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
아니
연구 대상 성별
모두
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be able to speak and read English
- Be diagnosed with cancer
- Have been informed of their eligibility for a specific phase II or III therapeutic clinical trial open for enrollment at the participating NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) site
- Have already met one or more eligibility criteria and have a reasonable expectation of meeting any remaining eligibility criteria for the therapeutic clinical trial
- Be capable of providing written informed consent for study participation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants must not have been asked previously to participate in another therapeutic cancer clinical trial
- Participants must not have already made a decision to participate in the phase II or III therapeutic clinical trial for which they were informed of their eligibility
- Participants must not have documented or observable visual, auditory, psychiatric, or neurological disorders that would interfere with study participation (e.g., blindness, deafness, psychosis, or dementia)
- Participants must not be eligible only for phase I trial; these patients are excluded because few of these trials are offered at NCORP sites and because their design and goals differ considerably from those of phase II and III trials
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 지지 요법
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Arm I (print educational)
Participants undergo a print educational intervention during which they meet with a site coordinator and are instructed to read the NCI booklet titled Taking Part in Cancer Treatment Studies, comprised primarily of information about the nature and conduct of cancer clinical trials.
|
print educational intervention
다른 이름들:
|
|
실험적: Arm II (multimedia psychoeducational)
Participants undergo a multimedia psychoeducational intervention during which they meet with a site coordinator and are instructed to view a DVD and read a booklet titled Clinical Trials: Are They Right For You? Participants are encouraged to watch the DVD and read the booklet again at home.
|
multimedia psychoeducational intervention
다른 이름들:
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Preparedness for Decision Making About Clinical Trial Participation, Measured Using Scores From the Preparation for Decision Making Scale
기간: Day 3 to 7
|
Preparation for Decision Making Scale (PDMS) is a valid and reliable 10-item self-report measure for which respondents rate the usefulness of materials they were provided in preparing them to communicate with their health care provider and make a health care decision.
Each item is scored 1 to 5 where 1=Not at All, 2=A Little, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a Bit, 5=A Great Deal.
Larger number is better.
All 10 scores are summed, then divided by 10; The result - 1 is then multiplied by 25 and we have a range from 0 (less prepared) - 100 (most prepared).
|
Day 3 to 7
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
The Decision Regret Scale (DRS)
기간: Day 49-56
|
The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) is a five-item paper and pencil self-report measure that asks subjects to reflect on a particular decision and then rate each item on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree).
A mean score for the DRS is calculated by reverse scoring the two negatively phrased items and dividing by five.
The mean scores are converted to a score ranging from 0 to 100 by subtracting 1 and multiplying by 25 and higher scores represent increases in the severity of decision regret.
Higher scores are worse.
|
Day 49-56
|
|
The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
기간: Day 49-56
|
The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a valid and reliable 16-item self-report measure that assesses the extent to which respondents experience certainty, satisfaction, and confidence following a health care decision.
In the present study, it will be keyed to the decision about therapeutic clinical trial participation.
Instructions given to respondents include asking them to reflect on the decisions have just made or are about to make and to respond to statements in the DCS using a five-point Likert scale.
Responses to each statement are scored from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), with negative statements having reverse scoring; thus high scores indicate higher decisional conflict.
|
Day 49-56
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
To Explore the Effects of Intervention Assignment on Clinical Trial Participation.
기간: Day 49-56
|
Given the ethical perspective that patients have a right to make autonomous decisions about clinical trial participation, no hypothesis is offered about the effect of intervention assignment on clinical trial participation rates.
To conduct the exploratory analysis regarding the effects of intervention assignment on clinical trial participation, data for all patients offered participation in a therapeutic clinical trial will be entered into a 2 (Intervention: MP or PE) x 2 (Clinical Trial Participation: Yes or No/Still Deciding) contingency table and analyzed using either a Fisher exact test or chi-square test as appropriate.
|
Day 49-56
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
스폰서
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Paul Jacobsen, University of Rochester
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
2014년 5월 1일
기본 완료 (실제)
2016년 8월 31일
연구 완료 (실제)
2016년 11월 1일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2014년 1월 31일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2014년 1월 31일
처음 게시됨 (추정)
2014년 2월 4일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2021년 1월 27일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2021년 1월 25일
마지막으로 확인됨
2021년 1월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- URCC12107 (기타 식별자: University of Rochester)
- U10CA037420 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)
- NCI-2013-02237 (레지스트리 식별자: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
- URCC-12107 (기타 식별자: DCP)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
아니요
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .