Interpretation of Health News Items Reporting Results of Pre-clinical Studies With or Without Spin By French-speaking Population
Interpretation of Health News Items Reporting Results of Pre-clinical Studies With or Without Spin: A Randomized Controlled Trial Among French-speaking Population
연구 개요
상세 설명
Health news is an important way to communicate updated medical research to the public. News items reporting the results of medical research attract a large audience. However, the quality of reporting in health news is questionable. The merits of a wide range of treatments and tests are overplayed and harms are underplayed. Several studies have shown the presence of spin (i.e., distorted presentation of study results) in health news. Distorted facts can be misleading and can affect the behaviour of physicians, healthcare providers and patients. However, little research has assessed whether spin can affect readers' interpretation of health news items.
Objective: To compare the interpretation of health news items reported with or without spin. News items reporting pre-clinical studies evaluating the effect of a pharmacological treatment that received high online public attention will be focused. "Spin" is defined as a misrepresentation of study results whatever the motive (intentionally or unintentionally) to highlight that the beneficial effect of the intervention in terms of efficacy and safety is greater than that shown by the results.
Hypothesis: The hypothesis of this study is that the spin can influence the reader's interpretation of health news items reporting results of pre-clinical studies.
Design: A randomized controlled trial
- Interventions: Health news items reporting results of pre-clinical studies with and without spin will be compared. A sample of health news items reporting the results of pre-clinical studies evaluating the effect of pharmacologic treatment and containing spin in the headline and text will be selected. Spin will be deleted in the selected news items and will be rewritten the news without spin.
- Participants: The participants will include French-speaking healthy population from Nutrinet santé.
- Sample size: For this RCT, the sample size will be 300 participants.
- Main outcome measures: The primary outcome will be participants' interpretation of the benefit of treatment after reading the news (What do you think is the probability that treatment X would be beneficial to patients? (scale, 0 [very unlikely] to 10 [very likely]).
- Expected results: This study will evaluate the impact of spin on the interpretation of news items reporting results of pre-clinical studies by French-speaking population.
- This study is approved by ethics review regulations by INSERM (CEEI-IRB): IRB00003888
연구 유형
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Ile-de-france
-
Paris, Ile-de-france, 프랑스, 75004
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Native French speakers who can read the news
Exclusion Criteria:
-
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 다른
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
활성 비교기: 스핀 뉴스
스핀으로 동물 연구 결과를 보고하는 뉴스 항목.
|
Interpretation of news items with spin
|
|
실험적: 스핀 없는 뉴스
스핀 없이 동물 연구 결과를 보고하는 뉴스 항목.
|
Interpretation of news items without spin
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Perception of beneficial effect of the treatment X. We ask participants, What do you think is the probability that treatment X would be beneficial to patients?
기간: As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
With the choices of answers on a 10 points Likert scale, (scale, 0 [very unlikely] to 10 [very likely])
|
As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Perception of efficacy, safety, availability and clinical utility in existing clinical practice for the treatment X. We will ask the participants: What do you think is the size of the potential benefit for patients?
기간: As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
With the choice of answers on a 5 points scale, (scale, [none, small, moderate or large]) -- analysis none, small vs moderate, large
|
As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
|
How safe do you think that treatment X would be for patients?
기간: As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
With the choices of answers on a 10 points Likert scale, (scale, 0 [very unsafe] to 10 [very safe])
|
As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
|
Do you think this treatment should be offered to patients in the short term?
기간: As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
With the choices of answers on a 10 points Likert scale, (scale, 0 [absolutely no] to 10 [absolutely yes])
|
As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
|
Do you think this treatment will make a difference in the existing clinical practice?
기간: As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
With the choices of answers on a 10 points Likert scale, (scale, 0 [absolutely no] to 10 [absolutely yes])
|
As the intervention is assigned (reading the news item) i.e., 1-2 hours
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
간행물 및 유용한 링크
유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (예상)
기본 완료 (예상)
연구 완료 (예상)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- ISB-002
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .