이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Organ Donation Survey Among Health Care Professionals in Argentina

2018년 3월 9일 업데이트: Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Knowledge, Professional Experience and Attitude Toward Organ Donation Among Health Care Professionals in Argentina: the DonAR Survey

The aim of this study is to gather information about knowledge, professional experience and attitude toward organ donation among health care professionals involved in the care of potential donors about the procurement process and potential lung donor management nationwide.

연구 개요

상태

알려지지 않은

상세 설명

The shortage of cadaveric organ donors for transplantation is a global problem. This fact prolongs the time on the waiting list and, therefore, the mortality, which rise to 21.15% in Argentina compared to a world average of 16%. Many reasons can explain the low procurement rate. It has been stated that the conventional ventilatory management for potential lung donors is suboptimal for lung preservation before harvest.

In Argentina there is limited research regarding the attitude toward organ donation among health care professionals, knowledge of the federal organ procurement program and professional experience in diagnosing brain death and lung donor management. Knowing the Argentinian current situation will make it possible to detect possible organ shortages causes, evaluate strategies to increase the national procurement rate and to instruct the health team that assists neurocritical patients who die of brain death. So we propose the following research.

The aim of this study is to gather information about knowledge, professional experience and attitude among health care professionals involved in the care of potential donors toward organ donation, procurement process and potential lung donor management nationwide.

A online questionnaire was designed and distributed among health care professionals register to different scientific societies related to the care of neurocritical patients between febrary 16th and september 1st. The questionnaire consisting of 37 ítems: 6 items measuring attitudes, 6 items measuring knowledge, 16 items investigating professional experience and 9 ítems assessing demographics.

연구 유형

관찰

등록 (예상)

200

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

23년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

샘플링 방법

비확률 샘플

연구 인구

Heath Care Professionals working in Adult and Pediatric Critical Care Units and Emergency Department from Argentinian Public and Private Hospitals, registrated in the Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • health care professionals
  • register to the Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva (SATI)
  • related to the care of neurocritical patients
  • between febrary 16th and september 1st.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unrelated to the care of neurocritical patients

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 관찰 모델: 다른
  • 시간 관점: 유망한

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Attitude Toward Organ Donation
기간: 6 months
investigated attitudes regarding organ donation among health care professional: is an organ donor:1, isn´t an organ donor:2, he/she haven´t been decided: 2
6 months
Organ Donor Registry
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional is a registered organ donor: Yes:1, No:0.
6 months
Last will manifest
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional´s spouse and / or family knows he/she organ donor attitude towards organ donation: Yes:1, No:0.
6 months
Reasons to donate
기간: 6 months
investigated reasons why the health care professional´ would donate their organs: To save the life of another person: 1, Because after death the body does not need anything: 2, To create awareness in the donation: 3, For religious reasons: 4, Others: 5
6 months
Reasons not to donate
기간: 6 months
investigated reasons why the health care professional´ would not donate their organs or haven´t decided: for religious aspects: 1, for the improper organs use: 2, to maintain my body integrity: 3, for fear of the removal of organs before my death: 4, for fear that they do not give me the attention Medical needed to save my life: 5, Others: 6
6 months
Level of knowledge
기간: 6 months
investigated how the health care professional would classify the level of knowledge regarding organ donation: Not at all informed: 1, Little informed: 2, Suitably informed: 3
6 months
Degree formation
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional received organ donation information during their degree formation: Yes:1, No:0.
6 months
Post degree formation
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional attended to courses on procurement or organ donation after their degree formation: Yes:1, No:0.
6 months
Brain death definition
기간: 6 months
investigated when health care professional consider a neurocritical patient as a potential organ donor: When the patient is in a coma: 1, When brain inactivity is corroborated with technical or instrumental means in a patient with irreversible absence of brain response with loss of consciousness, absence of spontaneous breathing, absence of cephalic reflexes and observation of fixed pupils: 2, When the patient is in a vegetative state: 3, When cardiorespiratory arrest occurs in the patient with irreversible absence of brain response with loss of consciousness, absence of spontaneous breathing, absence of cephalic reflexes and fixation of fixed pupils: 4, Other: 5
6 months
Lung organ donor criteria
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional know the criteria the organ donor must meet to be considered an optimal lung donor. PaO2 / FiO2> 300 with FiO2 1 and PEEP 10cmH2O, without evidence of aspiration / sepsis, absence of microorganism in sputum / BAL, absence of purulent secretions in tube: 1, X-ray with minimal infiltrates, no evidence of aspiration / sepsis, no history of cardiopulmonary surgery, absence of microorganism in sputum / BAL, absence of secretions: 2, clean chest X-ray, PaO2 / FiO2> 300 with FiO2 1 and PEEP 5cmH2O, absence of thoracic trauma, without evidence of aspiration / sepsis, no history of cardiopulmonary surgery, absence of microorganism in sputum / BAL, absence of purulent secretions in tube: 3, d. Unilateral thoracic trauma, with no evidence of aspiration / sepsis, no history of cardiopulmonary surgery, absence of microorganism in sputum / BAL, absence of purulent secretions in tube: 4
6 months
Organ Donor Consent
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional knows where and how to express he/she consent for organ donation: Yes:1, No:0.
6 months
Potential lung donor management protocols
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional knows if the health care institution were he/she works have a potential lung donor management protocol.
6 months
Neurocritical patients care
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional had ever assist a neurocritical patients during this professional career.
6 months
Call to the federal organ procurement organism to report a patients with a GCS ≤ 7
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional had ever call to the federal organ procurement organism (INCUCAI) to report a neurocritical patients with a GCS ≤ 7.
6 months
Apnea Test
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional had ever done an apnea test during this professional career.
6 months
Type of apnea test
기간: 6 months
investigated which type of apnea test the health care professional had done: the conventional apnea test consisting in preoxygenation and disconnection form the ventilator; or one of the alternative apnea test: by artificial increase of Co2; with CPAP or by controlled hypoventilation.
6 months
Call to the federal organ procurement organism to report a possible brain death patient:
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional had ever call to the federal organ procurement organism (INCUCAI) to report a possible brain death patient.
6 months
Potential organ donor patients care
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional had ever participated in the procurement process and maintenance (management) of a potential organ donor patient during this professional career.
6 months
Change in ventilator parameters
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional make a change in the ventilator parameters after the brain dead diagnosis.
6 months
Change in the fraction inspired oxygen
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional change the fraction inspired oxygen to 100% after the brain dead diagnosis, or reduced it if the potential lung donor have a PaO2/FiO2 > 300.
6 months
Ventilator parameters
기간: 6 months
investigated which tidal volume (Vt) and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) does the health care professional use to ventilate a potential lung donor patient among different options: Vt 10-12 mL/kg, PEEP 5 cmH20:1, Vt 10-12 mL/kg, PEEP 8-10 cmH20:2, Vt 8-10 mL/kg, PEEP 5 cmH20:3, Vt 8-10 mL/kg, PEEP 8-10 cmH20:4, Vt 6-8 mL/kg, PEEP 5 cmH20:5, Vt 6-8 mL/kg, PEEP 8-10cmH20:6, Other:7
6 months
Strategies to improve oxygenation
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional use any strategy to improve oxygenation in case of low oxygenation and which type of strategies does it use: change positioning:1, pulmonary expansion techniques:2, endotracheal suctioning:3, Fiberoptic bronchoscopy:4, Recruitment maneuvers: 5, PEEP titulation:6, Others:7
6 months
Type of Recruitment maneuver
기간: 6 months
investigated the most commonly used type of recruitment maneuver in a potential PULMONARY donor: Sighs with increased Tidal Volume for several breaths: 1, CPAP of 40 cmH20 for 40 seconds: 2, CPAP of 30 cmH20 for 30 seconds: 3, Step increase of PEEP to 40 cmH20 and then stepwise decrease: 4, PC Mode CMV with inspiratory pressure of 25-30 cmH20 and PEEP 10-15 cmH20 for 2 hours for a single time: 5, PC-CMV mode with inspiratory pressure of 20 cmH20 and stepwise increase of PEEP to 20-30 cmH20: 6, PEEP of 18-20 cmH20 for 1 minute, then decrease PEEP and increase Tidal Volume for several breaths: 7, Other: 8.
6 months
Type of PEEP titulation
기간: 6 months
PEEP / FiO2 Table (ARDS Network): 1, PEEP / Compliance Protocol: 2, Determination of the lower inflection point per Pressure / Volume curve: 3, Increase of the PEEP for Plateau Pressure <28 cmH20 (Express Protocol): 4, Guided by esophageal manometry: 5, Guided by pulmonary ultrasound: 6, Guided by volumetric capnography: 7, Other: 8
6 months
Use of a closed-circuit for endotracheal suctioning
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional use a closed-circuit for endotracheal suctioning.
6 months
Measures to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia
기간: 6 months
investigated whether the health care professional consider important to continue the care bundle to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia such as: head elevation, tracheal cuff control, oral hygiene, etc.
6 months

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Vanesa R Ruiz, RT, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2018년 2월 16일

기본 완료 (예상)

2018년 4월 1일

연구 완료 (예상)

2018년 9월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2018년 3월 1일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2018년 3월 1일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 3월 8일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2018년 3월 12일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2018년 3월 9일

마지막으로 확인됨

2018년 2월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

뇌사에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다