- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT04176146
Nudging Healthcare Organizations to Adopt New Care Delivery Practices
Accelerating the Use of Evidence-based Innovation in Health Care Systems
연구 개요
상세 설명
The purpose of this study is to assess if behavioral 'nudges' impact the likelihood of healthcare organization administrators accessing technical assistance resources to support uptake of care delivery practices that: (1) have the potential to improve patient outcomes; and (2) have already been adopted by most healthcare organizations. A 'nudge' is a change in the way information is presented that attempts to steer people in a certain direction but does not restrict their choices.
The investigator will conduct a randomized controlled trial of written messages to healthcare administrators at three types of healthcare organizations - physician practices, hospitals and healthcare systems - from among 3,402 administrators who completed Dartmouth's National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (NSHOS) in 2017-2018.
In Fall 2019 the investigator will mail a customized report to all NSHOS respondents that compares their organizations' survey responses to their peer organizations. The investigator will randomize the 2,387 respondents whose organizations have not implemented one or more of up to seven chosen care delivery practices to cover letters with or without social norms messaging. The written messaging in the 'control condition' cover letter lists the practices for which the NSHOS team has prepared technical assistance materials in support of practice adoption, and contains a link to these online resources. The 'intervention condition' additionally highlights the organization's performance compared to its peers in adopting the practices using visual data display and explicit social norms messaging.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 미국, 03766
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant responded to NSHOS survey and reported that their organization had not implemented at least one of up to seven pre-determined care delivery practices, out of the following eight practices featured in the NSHOS: Screening for opioid use specifically; Screening for substance use disorders; Screening for depression; Screening for interpersonal violence; Method for identifying high-cost patients; Use of evidence-based guidelines for congestive heart failure; Use of evidence-based guidelines for sepsis (included in letters to healthcare system administrators, but not hospitals or physician practices); Training for shared decision making (included in letters to hospitals and physician practices but not healthcare systems)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Did not respond to NSHOS survey
- Participant responded to NSHOS survey and reported that their organization had already implemented each of seven pre-determined care delivery practices, out of the following eight practices featured in the NSHOS: Screening for opioid use specifically; Screening for substance use disorders; Screening for depression; Screening for interpersonal violence; Method for identifying high-cost patients; Use of evidence-based guidelines for congestive heart failure; Use of evidence-based guidelines for sepsis (included in letters to healthcare system administrators, but not hospitals or physician practices); Training for shared decision making (included in letters to hospitals and physician practices but not healthcare systems)
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Nudge Letter
Participants receive a letter that highlights their performance vs. peer organizations on up to seven care delivery practices featured in the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (NSHOS).
The letter includes a link to access technical assistance resources and is sent alongside the participant's NSHOS respondent report.
|
This group will receive a letter noting that their organization has not implemented at least one common care delivery practice that a majority their peers have already implemented.
The letter will also note the percentage of peer organizations that have implemented the practice.
This is done using peer comparison data and social norms messaging.
|
|
간섭 없음: Control Letter
Participants receive a letter with a link to technical assistance resources; the letter is sent alongside the participant's NSHOS survey respondent report.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of participants who access the technical assistance resource webpage
기간: Up to 2 months after letter is sent
|
The percentage of participants who access the technical assistance webpage will be determined by email and webpage analytics.
The primary analysis will be intention to treat (i.e., among all participants sent a letter); a secondary analysis will be a 'per protocol' analysis (i.e., among all participants whose letter was not sent back as undeliverable).
Exploratory sub-group analyses will be conducted by each strata characteristic (e.g., whether organization category influences the likelihood of accessing the webpage).
|
Up to 2 months after letter is sent
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of unique resource views on technical assistance resource webpage
기간: Up to 2 months after letter is sent
|
The number of unique resources viewed from the webpage, as determined by website analytics.
|
Up to 2 months after letter is sent
|
|
Percentage of participants who request connection to peer organizations via the technical assistance resource webpage
기간: Up to 2 months after letter is sent
|
The number of unique organizations that request to be matched with other healthcare organizations that have successfully implemented one of the care delivery practices, in order to learn from their experiences (there will be a clickable link on the webpage for organizations to request this connection).
This will be determined by website analytics.
|
Up to 2 months after letter is sent
|
|
Perceived effect of letter on administrators' intentions
기간: Up to 4 months after letter is sent
|
Effect of letter on administrators' intentions and actions, measured by qualitative interviews in a sub-sample of participants.
|
Up to 4 months after letter is sent
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Amber E Barnato, MD, MPH, MS, Dartmouth College
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- Dartmouth IRB protocol #28763
- 1U19HS024075 (미국 AHRQ 보조금/계약)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .