Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Nudging Healthcare Organizations to Adopt New Care Delivery Practices

24 juni 2020 uppdaterad av: Amber Barnato, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Accelerating the Use of Evidence-based Innovation in Health Care Systems

This two-arm, parallel group randomized controlled trial will assess the impact of written social norms messaging (i.e., behavioral 'nudges') on healthcare organization administrators' decision to access online resources that support the adoption of evidence-based healthcare delivery practices. The healthcare delivery practices include the use of population screening tools, clinical practice guidelines, and shared decision making training.

Studieöversikt

Detaljerad beskrivning

The purpose of this study is to assess if behavioral 'nudges' impact the likelihood of healthcare organization administrators accessing technical assistance resources to support uptake of care delivery practices that: (1) have the potential to improve patient outcomes; and (2) have already been adopted by most healthcare organizations. A 'nudge' is a change in the way information is presented that attempts to steer people in a certain direction but does not restrict their choices.

The investigator will conduct a randomized controlled trial of written messages to healthcare administrators at three types of healthcare organizations - physician practices, hospitals and healthcare systems - from among 3,402 administrators who completed Dartmouth's National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (NSHOS) in 2017-2018.

In Fall 2019 the investigator will mail a customized report to all NSHOS respondents that compares their organizations' survey responses to their peer organizations. The investigator will randomize the 2,387 respondents whose organizations have not implemented one or more of up to seven chosen care delivery practices to cover letters with or without social norms messaging. The written messaging in the 'control condition' cover letter lists the practices for which the NSHOS team has prepared technical assistance materials in support of practice adoption, and contains a link to these online resources. The 'intervention condition' additionally highlights the organization's performance compared to its peers in adopting the practices using visual data display and explicit social norms messaging.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

2387

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, Förenta staterna, 03766
        • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

18 år och äldre (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant responded to NSHOS survey and reported that their organization had not implemented at least one of up to seven pre-determined care delivery practices, out of the following eight practices featured in the NSHOS: Screening for opioid use specifically; Screening for substance use disorders; Screening for depression; Screening for interpersonal violence; Method for identifying high-cost patients; Use of evidence-based guidelines for congestive heart failure; Use of evidence-based guidelines for sepsis (included in letters to healthcare system administrators, but not hospitals or physician practices); Training for shared decision making (included in letters to hospitals and physician practices but not healthcare systems)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Did not respond to NSHOS survey
  • Participant responded to NSHOS survey and reported that their organization had already implemented each of seven pre-determined care delivery practices, out of the following eight practices featured in the NSHOS: Screening for opioid use specifically; Screening for substance use disorders; Screening for depression; Screening for interpersonal violence; Method for identifying high-cost patients; Use of evidence-based guidelines for congestive heart failure; Use of evidence-based guidelines for sepsis (included in letters to healthcare system administrators, but not hospitals or physician practices); Training for shared decision making (included in letters to hospitals and physician practices but not healthcare systems)

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Hälsovårdsforskning
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Enda

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Experimentell: Nudge Letter
Participants receive a letter that highlights their performance vs. peer organizations on up to seven care delivery practices featured in the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (NSHOS). The letter includes a link to access technical assistance resources and is sent alongside the participant's NSHOS respondent report.
This group will receive a letter noting that their organization has not implemented at least one common care delivery practice that a majority their peers have already implemented. The letter will also note the percentage of peer organizations that have implemented the practice. This is done using peer comparison data and social norms messaging.
Inget ingripande: Control Letter
Participants receive a letter with a link to technical assistance resources; the letter is sent alongside the participant's NSHOS survey respondent report.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Percentage of participants who access the technical assistance resource webpage
Tidsram: Up to 2 months after letter is sent
The percentage of participants who access the technical assistance webpage will be determined by email and webpage analytics. The primary analysis will be intention to treat (i.e., among all participants sent a letter); a secondary analysis will be a 'per protocol' analysis (i.e., among all participants whose letter was not sent back as undeliverable). Exploratory sub-group analyses will be conducted by each strata characteristic (e.g., whether organization category influences the likelihood of accessing the webpage).
Up to 2 months after letter is sent

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Number of unique resource views on technical assistance resource webpage
Tidsram: Up to 2 months after letter is sent
The number of unique resources viewed from the webpage, as determined by website analytics.
Up to 2 months after letter is sent
Percentage of participants who request connection to peer organizations via the technical assistance resource webpage
Tidsram: Up to 2 months after letter is sent
The number of unique organizations that request to be matched with other healthcare organizations that have successfully implemented one of the care delivery practices, in order to learn from their experiences (there will be a clickable link on the webpage for organizations to request this connection). This will be determined by website analytics.
Up to 2 months after letter is sent
Perceived effect of letter on administrators' intentions
Tidsram: Up to 4 months after letter is sent
Effect of letter on administrators' intentions and actions, measured by qualitative interviews in a sub-sample of participants.
Up to 4 months after letter is sent

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Amber E Barnato, MD, MPH, MS, Dartmouth College

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

9 december 2019

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

9 februari 2020

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

8 juni 2020

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

14 november 2019

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

22 november 2019

Första postat (Faktisk)

25 november 2019

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

26 juni 2020

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

24 juni 2020

Senast verifierad

1 juni 2020

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • Dartmouth IRB protocol #28763
  • 1U19HS024075 (U.S.A. AHRQ-anslag/kontrakt)

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

NEJ

Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt

Nej

Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera