Vouchers to Increase Uptake of Already Free Eye Care
Providing Vouchers Redeemable for Already Free Eye Exams To Increase Uptake Among a Low-Income Minority Population: A Randomized Trial
연구 개요
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, 미국, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Hospital - Wilmer Eye Institute
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Referred for follow-up at a Screening to Prevent Glaucoma (SToP) study screening event (overarching observational study from which trial sample was drawn). SToP participants were referred for follow-up for any of the following conditions: (1) VA worse than 20/40 in at least 1 eye despite autorefraction; (2) signs of retinal abnormalities on fundus photography; (3) uninterpretable fundus photography; (4) cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) greater than or equal to 0.9, and/or CDR between 0.7 and 0.9 with visual field defects or history of glaucoma; and (5) IOP of 23 mm Hg or greater.
Exclusion Criteria:
- SToP participants who were not referred at the time of screening but later contacted after review of fundus photography
- SToP participants who were referred for follow-up but stated at the time of counseling that they were already under the care of an eye doctor
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
간섭 없음: No Voucher
Individuals being referred from screening events randomized to "no intervention" received the standard approach to offering free follow-up examinations (patient education, standard counseling, appointment information packet, reminder phone calls).
|
|
|
실험적: Voucher Without Value Information
In addition to receiving the standard approach above, individuals being referred from screening events randomized to "Voucher Without Value Information" received a personal voucher.
|
Patients being referred for follow-up received standard materials, counseling, and reminders as in the 'no information' group and were provided with a physical voucher they were told is redeemable for free follow-up appointment at Johns Hopkins Hospital. The voucher included the patient's name, the screener's name, and an expiration date 90 days from the date of screening. These participants were told: "I am going to give you this voucher for a completely free appointment and a free pair of glasses if you need them. So, with this voucher, both the exam and the glasses will be completely free." |
|
실험적: Voucher With Value Information
In addition to receiving the standard approach above, individuals being referred from screening events randomized to "Voucher With Value Information" received a personal voucher, which differed from the voucher in the second arm since it included a statement of value.
|
Patients being referred for follow-up received standard materials, counseling, and reminders as in the 'no information' group and were provided with a physical voucher they were told is redeemable for free follow-up appointment at Johns Hopkins Hospital, which would normally cost $250. The voucher included the patient's name, the screener's name, an expiration date 90 days from the date of screening, and a statement about the $250 voucher value. These participants were told: "I am going to give you this voucher for a completely free appointment and a free pair of glasses if you need them. These services normally cost about $250, but with this voucher, both the exam and the glasses will be completely free." |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Uptake of follow-up appointment
기간: Within 90 days of the date of screening
|
The primary endpoint was attending a follow-up appointment, either on the initially scheduled or on a rescheduled date within 90 days of the date of screening.
Individuals who did not meet this endpoint either stated that they were not interested in follow-up at the screening event itself, cancelled or did not show for their appointments on 3 occasions, stated that they were not interested in follow-up when study staff attempted to reschedule, or did not show for an appointment and could not be reached for rescheduling after 3 attempts.
|
Within 90 days of the date of screening
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Uptake of initial appointment
기간: Within 90 days of the date of screening
|
Binary indicator for completion of the initially scheduled appointment.
|
Within 90 days of the date of screening
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Seema Kacker, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
- 수석 연구원: David S Friedman, MD PhD, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Hospital
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .