Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Clinicians With Different Experience Levels in Assessing Gingival Phenotype
The goal of this observational study is to compare the performance of clinicians with different experience levels and a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) model in assessing gingival phenotype using two diagnostic methods: the periodontal probe transparency method and visual assessment from standardized clinical photographs. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
Can AI achieve comparable accuracy to human examiners in both probe transparency and visual assessment methods?
Does examiner experience level influence diagnostic performance and agreement with the reference standard in these methods?
Researchers will compare AI, dental students, and periodontology research assistants to determine accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with the gold standard for each method.
Participants will:
Undergo standardized intraoral photography of maxillary anterior teeth, with and without a periodontal probe in place, following a validated protocol.
Have gingival phenotype determined by a reference periodontologist using the probe transparency method as the gold standard.
Have their photographs evaluated by AI, dental students, and research assistants for phenotype classification using both methods.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
Gingival phenotype, representing the thickness and morphological characteristics of the gingival soft tissues, plays a critical role in periodontal health, treatment planning, and the long-term stability of clinical outcomes. A thin phenotype is associated with increased risk of gingival recession, papilla loss, and inflammatory complications, while a thick phenotype offers better soft tissue stability but may mask inflammation. Accurate and reproducible assessment of gingival phenotype is therefore essential in clinical dentistry.
The periodontal probe transparency method is considered the gold standard for phenotype assessment due to its simplicity and non-invasiveness. In this method, a periodontal probe is inserted into the sulcus from the buccal aspect, and if the probe is visible through the gingival tissue, the phenotype is classified as thin; if not visible, it is classified as thick. However, the method is susceptible to variability depending on examiner experience, lighting conditions, and subjective interpretation.
Visual assessment, which relies solely on the inspection of gingival and tooth morphology in photographs without a probe, offers a non-contact alternative but is similarly subject to examiner-related variability. These limitations highlight the need for standardized and objective approaches to phenotype determination.
Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning-based image analysis, has shown promising results in dental diagnostics, enabling automated classification of clinical images with high accuracy and reproducibility. In periodontal research, AI has been applied for lesion detection and radiographic interpretation, but its application in gingival phenotype assessment-especially using the probe transparency method and visual assessment-remains unexplored.
This observational study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of a deep learning-based AI model with human examiners of different experience levels (periodontology residents vs. dental students) in assessing gingival phenotype from standardized intraoral photographs using both the periodontal probe transparency method and visual assessment. The reference standard will be the classification provided by an experienced periodontologist using the probe transparency method in a clinical setting.
The study will evaluate and compare accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and inter-/intra-examiner agreement across examiner groups and the AI model. The findings are expected to provide insights into the potential of AI as a standardizing tool, reducing inter-examiner variability and supporting clinical decision-making, particularly for less experienced clinicians. Additionally, the study may inform the integration of AI-assisted diagnostic tools in dental education and practice, improving training efficiency and clinical outcomes.
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
연락처 및 위치
연구 연락처
- 이름: Sude Yıldırım Bolat, DDS
- 전화번호: +905378947645
- 이메일: sugde.sude@gmail.com
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
샘플링 방법
연구 인구
The study population will consist of systemically and periodontally healthy adults attending the Department of Periodontology at Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, for routine dental care or check-up. Eligible participants will have natural maxillary anterior incisors and meet all inclusion criteria.
Additionally, the examiner population will include:
Periodontology research assistants currently working in the department.
Fourth- and fifth-year dental intern students who have completed the periodontology clinical rotation.
설명
Inclusion Criteria for Volunteer Participants Who Will Participate in Transparency and Visual Assessment:
- Systemically and periodontally healthy individuals.
- Presence of natural maxillary anterior incisors.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of fixed crowns or cervical restorations on the evaluated teeth.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Signs of gingival inflammation or periodontal disease with attachment loss.
- Presence of buccal gingival recession.
- Use of medications known to cause gingival enlargement.
- Presence of congenital anomalies or dental structural defects.
Inclusion Criteria for Clinicians:
- Research assistants: Must be currently working in the Department of Periodontology.
- Dental Intern Students: Fourth- or fifth-year students who have completed periodontology clinical rotation.
Exclusion Criteria for Clinicians:
- Those who are confirmed to be color blind by the Ishihara test
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
코호트 및 개입
그룹/코호트 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
Dental Students
Fourth- and fifth-year dental intern students will assess standardized intraoral photographs using both the periodontal probe transparency method and visual assessment to classify gingival phenotype.
|
Standardized intraoral photography of the maxillary anterior teeth with a periodontal probe placed according to the transparency method protocol to determine probe visibility status.
Standardized intraoral photography of the maxillary anterior teeth without a periodontal probe, evaluated for gingival phenotype classification based on morphological features.
|
|
Artificial Intelligence Model
A deep learning-based image classification model will analyze standardized intraoral photographs, detecting probe visibility and classifying gingival phenotype according to the periodontal probe transparency method and visual assessment criteria.
|
Standardized intraoral photography of the maxillary anterior teeth with a periodontal probe placed according to the transparency method protocol to determine probe visibility status.
Standardized intraoral photography of the maxillary anterior teeth without a periodontal probe, evaluated for gingival phenotype classification based on morphological features.
A deep learning image classification algorithm trained to assess probe visibility and gingival phenotype from standardized intraoral photographs.
|
|
Periodontology Research Assistants
Research assistants in periodontology will assess standardized intraoral photographs using both the periodontal probe transparency method and visual assessment to classify gingival phenotype.
|
Standardized intraoral photography of the maxillary anterior teeth with a periodontal probe placed according to the transparency method protocol to determine probe visibility status.
Standardized intraoral photography of the maxillary anterior teeth without a periodontal probe, evaluated for gingival phenotype classification based on morphological features.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Accuracy of Each Examiner Group and AI Model in the Periodontal Probe Transparency Method
기간: At the time of image evaluation (single session).
|
Accuracy in determining probe visibility (visible vs. not visible) compared to the gold standard classification by an experienced periodontologist. Measure Type: Proportion (%). Analysis: Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa coefficient will be calculated. |
At the time of image evaluation (single session).
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic Accuracy of Each Examiner Group and AI Model in Visual Assessment Method
기간: At the time of image evaluation (single session).
|
Accuracy in classifying gingival phenotype (thin vs. thick) without probe, compared to the gold standard classification. Measure Type: Proportion (%). |
At the time of image evaluation (single session).
|
|
Agreement Between Examiner Groups and AI Model
기간: At the time of image evaluation and at 2-week retest (for a random subset of evaluators).
|
Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for each method, evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
|
At the time of image evaluation and at 2-week retest (for a random subset of evaluators).
|
|
Effect of Examiner Experience Level on Diagnostic Performance
기간: At the time of image evaluation (single session).
|
Comparison of accuracy and agreement between research assistants and dental intern students for each method. Proportion (%), agreement statistic. |
At the time of image evaluation (single session).
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (추정된)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- OMUKAEK NO:225/335
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
IPD 공유 기간
IPD 공유 액세스 기준
IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형
- 연구_프로토콜
- 수액
- ICF
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .