- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07611331
Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Primary Cesarean Section
Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure After Primary Cesarean Section: Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness and Cesarean Scar Defect Formation - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
This study compares two surgical techniques for closing the uterus after cesarean section: single-layer versus double-layer closure. The primary objective is to determine which technique results in better uterine scar healing, measured by residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and cesarean scar defect (niche) prevalence at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively.
BACKGROUND:
Cesarean section is one of the most common surgeries worldwide. After fetal delivery, the uterine incision must be closed by suture. Poor scar healing can lead to niche formation, abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and complications in future pregnancies including uterine rupture and placenta accreta.
INTERVENTION:
Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either:
- Single-layer closure: one continuous non-locking suture through full myometrial thickness
- Double-layer closure: two successive extra-mucosal non-locking sutures excluding the decidua
ASSESSMENTS:
Transvaginal ultrasound at 6 weeks and 6 months measures RMT and niche presence. Standardized symptom questionnaires assess pelvic pain, spotting, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia.
ELIGIBILITY:
Women aged 18-45 years undergoing primary cesarean section with singleton pregnancy at term (gestational age ≥ 37 weeks).
ENROLLMENT: 384 participants (192 per group)
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hedi Chaker University Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia
FOLLOW-UP: 6 months per participant in which the patients attend 2 follow-up visits:
First visit 6 weeks after surgery. Second visit at 6 months after surgery
.And have a pelvic ultrasound at each visit
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
Cesarean section is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. After fetal delivery, the uterine incision must be closed by suture using one of two accepted techniques: single-layer or double-layer closure. Despite widespread use of both methods : no consensus exists regarding which technique produces superior long-term uterine scar healing.
Poor scar healing can result in a niche. formation (isthmocele), defined as a triangular anechoic indentation of the anterior uterine wall at the scar site with depth greater than or equal to 2 mm (Jordan et al., 2019). Niches occur in 25-70% of women after cesarean section and are associated with postmenstrual spotting, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, fertility impairment, and serious obstetric complications in future pregnancies, including placenta accreta spectrum and uterine rupture.
The residual myometrial thickness (RMT) is the primary ultrasound marker of scar healing quality, defined as the minimum myometrial thickness at the scar site. An RMT below 2.5 mm is associated with a substantially increased risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies.
Previous studies comparing single-layer and double-layer closure have been limited by heterogeneous populations including scarred uteri, non-standardized surgical techniques, inconsistent ultrasound protocols, and insufficient sample sizes. No study has focused exclusively on primary cesarean sections with a fully standardized operative protocol.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUES
Single-Layer Closure (Group A): The uterine incision is closed with one continuous non-locking suture incorporating the full thickness of the myometrium in one pass, including the decidua.
Double-Layer Closure (Group B): The uterine incision is closed with two successive non-locking extra-mucosal sutures, excluding the decidua. Layer 1 approximates the inner half of the myometrium. Layer 2 buries the first layer, incorporating the outer half of the myometrium and uterine serosa.
All other operative steps are strictly standardized across both groups.
ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL
Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) is performed by blinded trained sonographers using Samsung HS40 with EVN4-9 probe (4-9 MHz), with empty bladder, preferably in the follicular phase (Day 7-14 of the menstrual cycle), in the mid-sagittal plane.
RMT is measured perpendicular to the serosa at the thinnest scar point. Adjacent myometrial thickness (AMT) is measured 5-10 mm from the scar on both sides. The myometrial ratio is calculated as RM (%) = RMT/AMT x 100.
Niche dimensions (depth, length, width) and volume (ellipsoid formula) are recorded when present.
RANDOMIZATION
Participants are randomized 1:1 using the Clinical Trial Randomization Tool with permuted blocks of variable sizes (4, 6, and 8). Allocation is revealed to the operating surgeon immediately before hysterorrhaphy, after fetal and placentaldelivery. Participants and ultrasound assessors are blinded to group allocation.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Primary analysis uses multiple linear regression for RMT and binary logistic regression for niche prevalence, adjusted for age, BMI, gestational age, uterine exteriorization, surgeon category, and cesarean indication.
Advanced analyses include linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures, Firth penalized logistic regression for predictive modeling, counterfactual mediation analysis (Imai et al.) with bootstrap validation (10,000 replications), inverse probability weighting for loss to follow-up, and five-scenario multiple imputation (MICE).
Software: SPSS v26.0 and R v4.3. Reporting: CONSORT 2010 guidelines.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
This trial is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013), ICH-GCP E6(R2), and Tunisian national regulations. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Sfax (Approval No. 31/26). All participants provide written informed consent. Participation is voluntary and withdrawal is permitted at any time without consequence to medical care.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Sfax Governorate
-
Sfax, Sfax Governorate, 튀니지, 3000
- Hedi Chaker university hospital
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women aged 18 years or older
- Singleton pregnancy
- Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks (term pregnancy)
- Scheduled or emergency primary cesarean section (first cesarean delivery, no previous uterine scar)
- Low transverse uterine incision (Pfannenstiel or Joel-Cohen approach)
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Willingness to attend follow-up visits at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively
- Patient affiliated to a social security system or equivalent healthcare coverage
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous uterine surgery (prior cesarean section, myomectomy, uterine perforation, or any procedure leaving a uterine scar)
- Multiple pregnancy (twins or higher-order multiples)
- Preterm delivery (gestational age < 37 weeks)
- Classical (vertical) or inverted T uterine incision
- Placenta previa or placenta accreta spectrum disorder
- Active uterine infection or chorioamnionitis at time of surgery
- Coagulation disorders or anticoagulant therapy
- Immunosuppressive therapy or conditions affecting wound healing (systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants)
- Severe maternal comorbidities (uncontrolled diabetes, connective tissue disorders, chronic renal failure)
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial
- Patient unable to attend scheduled follow-up visits
- Patient unable to understand or sign informed consent
- Fetal demise or major fetal malformation
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 다른
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
활성 비교기: Single-layer Uterine Closure (HPU)
Participants allocated to this arm undergo primary cesarean section with single-layer uterine closure (hysterorrhaphy).
After fetal and placental extraction, the uterine incision is closed in one single layer using a continuous absorbable suture (polyglactin 910 or equivalent), which approximates the myometrium in a running unlocked pattern.
No second imbricating layer is performed.
Additional interrupted sutures (reinforcement stitches) may be placed if necessary for bleeding control.
All participants are followed postoperatively with standardized transvaginal ultrasound assessments at 6 weeks and 6 months to evaluate residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and cesarean scar defect (niche) development, as well as clinical symptom monitoring.
|
After fetal and placental delivery, the uterine incision is closed in one single layer using a continuous absorbable suture (polyglactin 910) approximating the full myometrial thickness in a running pattern.
No second reinforcement layer is performed.
Additional reinforcement sutures are placed if needed.
This represents the conventional standard technique for uterine closure at cesarean section.
다른 이름들:
|
|
실험적: Double-layer Uterine Closure (HDP)
articipants allocated to this arm undergo primary cesarean section with double-layer uterine closure (hysterorrhaphy).
After fetal and placental extraction, the uterine incision is closed in two distinct layers using a continuous absorbable suture (polyglactin 910 or equivalent).
The first layer approximates the myometrium with a running unlocked suture.
The second layer invaginates the first using a continuous suture to reinforce the closure and improve hemostasis.
Additional interrupted sutures (reinforcement stitches) may be placed if necessary for bleeding control.
All participants are followed postoperatively with standardized transvaginal ultrasound assessments at 6 weeks and 6 months to evaluate residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and cesarean scar defect (niche) development, as well as clinical symptom monitoring.
|
After fetal and placental delivery, the uterine incision is closed in two layers using continuous absorbable suture (polyglactin 910).
Layer 1: running suture approximating the full myometrial thickness.
Layer 2: continuous imbricating suture reinforcing the first layer and improving hemostasis.
Additional reinforcement sutures placed if needed.
Aims to optimize uterine scar healing and reduce cesarean scar defect (niche) formation.
다른 이름들:
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Residual Myometrial Thickness (RMT) at the Cesarean Scar at 6 Weeks and 6 Months
기간: 6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
Residual myometrial thickness (RMT) measured in millimeters at the thinnest point of the uterine scar using standardized transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound, performed by blinded sonographers according to the protocol of Naji et al. (2012).
RMT compared between single-layer (HPU) and double-layer (HDP) closure groups at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively.
|
6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
|
Prevalence of Cesarean Scar Defect (Niche) at 6 Weeks and 6 Months Postoperatively
기간: 6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
Cesarean scar defect (niche) defined as a hypoechoic triangular indentation at the site of the uterine incision with depth ≥ 2mm or residual myometrial thickness (RMT)/adjacent myometrial thickness (AMT) ratio < 50%, detected by standardized transvaginal two-dimensional ultrasound.
Prevalence compared between single-layer (HPU) and double-layer (HDP) closure groups at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively.
|
6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Prevalence of Gynecological Symptoms Related to Cesarean Scar Defect
기간: Day 10, 6 weeks, and 6 months after cesarean section
|
Assessment of symptoms potentially related to uterine scar defect including: postmenstrual spotting, menometrorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, urinary symptoms, and abnormal uterine bleeding at day 10 postoperatively.
Symptoms assessed by standardized clinical questionnaire at 6 weeks and 6 months.
Compared between HPU and HDP groups.
|
Day 10, 6 weeks, and 6 months after cesarean section
|
|
Identification of Independent Risk Factors for Cesarean Scar Defect Formation
기간: 6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
Identification of independent risk factors for cesarean scar defect (niche) at 6 weeks and 6 months using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Variables assessed include: closure technique, operative duration, use of reinforcement sutures, uterine position, BMI, parity, type of cesarean section (elective vs emergency), and cervical dilation at time of surgery.
|
6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
|
Cesarean Scar Defect Linear Dimensions
기간: 6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
Length, width, and depth of detected cesarean scar defect measured in millimeters by transvaginal ultrasound at 6 weeks and 6 months.
Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
|
6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
|
Cesarean Scar Defect Volume
기간: 6 weeks and 6 months post-cesarean
|
Estimated volume of cesarean scar defect calculated using ellipsoid formula: V(mm³) = (π/6) × Length × Width × Depth Unit of Measure: Cubic millimeters (mm³)
|
6 weeks and 6 months post-cesarean
|
|
Operative Duration of Hysterorrhaphy and Total Cesarean Section
기간: preoperative (during cesarean section procedure)
|
Measurement of time (minutes and seconds) required for uterine closure (hysterorrhaphy duration) and total operative time from skin incision to skin closure.
Number of suture materials used and frequency of additional reinforcement sutures also recorded.
Compared between HPU and HDP groups.
|
preoperative (during cesarean section procedure)
|
|
Intraoperative Complications Rate
기간: Perioperative : During cesarean section procedure
|
Rate of intraoperative complications including hemorrhage requiring transfusion, bladder injury, ureteral injury, and unintended uterine incision extension.
Unit of Measure: Number of events (n) and percentage (%)
|
Perioperative : During cesarean section procedure
|
|
Postoperative Infectious Complications Rate
기간: Up to 6 weeks after cesarean section
|
Rate of postoperative infectious complications including endometritis, surgical site infection, and urinary tract infection, assessed during hospitalization and at 6-week visit.
Unit of Measure: Number of events (n) and percentage (%)
|
Up to 6 weeks after cesarean section
|
|
Hospital Length of Stay
기간: Up to 5 days after cesarean section
|
Number of days from cesarean section to hospital discharge.
Unit of Measure: Days
|
Up to 5 days after cesarean section
|
|
Blood Transfusion Requirement
기간: Up to 5 days after cesarean section
|
Number of packed red blood cell units transfused during hospitalization.
Unit of Measure: Number of units
|
Up to 5 days after cesarean section
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mediation Analysis: Role of Early Scar Defect in Late Outcome
기간: 6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
Formal mediation analysis (Baron-Kenny approach, Sobel test, non-parametric bootstrap with 10,000 replications) to quantify the proportion of the protective effect of double-layer closure on 6-month niche prevalence that is mediated through prevention of early niche formation at 6 weeks.
Proportion of mediated effect and direct/indirect effects will be calculated.
|
6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
|
Development of a Clinical Symptom-Based Predictive Score for Cesarean Scar Defect
기간: 6 months after cesarean section
|
Development and internal validation of a clinical predictive score based exclusively on self-reported symptoms (spotting, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, cycle irregularity) to identify patients at risk of cesarean scar defect at 6 months, without requiring ultrasound.
Firth penalized logistic regression, 10-fold cross-validation, and bootstrap validation will be performed.
AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV reported.
|
6 months after cesarean section
|
|
Identification of a Functional RMT Threshold Associated with Symptomatic Risk
기간: 6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
Identification of a residual myometrial thickness (RMT) threshold at 6 weeks postoperatively that is associated with increased risk of gynecological symptoms at 6 months, using ROC curve analysis and dose-response gradient assessment.
This threshold will complement existing obstetric safety thresholds by adding a functional/symptomatic dimension.
|
6 weeks and 6 months after cesarean section
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Derbel Mohamed, Professor, Department of obstetric and gynaecology of Hedi Chaker sfax
- 수석 연구원: Khanfir Fatma, Professor, Department of obstetric and gynaecology of Hedi Chaker sfax
간행물 및 유용한 링크
일반 간행물
- Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, Witmer M, Veersema S, Brolmann HA, Bourne T, Huirne JA. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;43(4):372-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.13199.
- Jordans IPM, de Leeuw RA, Stegwee SI, Amso NN, Barri-Soldevila PN, van den Bosch T, Bourne T, Brolmann HAM, Donnez O, Dueholm M, Hehenkamp WJK, Jastrow N, Jurkovic D, Mashiach R, Naji O, Streuli I, Timmerman D, van der Voet LF, Huirne JAF. Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):107-115. doi: 10.1002/uog.19049.
- Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, Bujold E, Bifulco G, Berghella V. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):578-583. doi: 10.1002/uog.17401. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
- Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, Chaillet N, Moore L, Bujold E. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
- Stegwee SI, Ben AJ, El Alili M, van der Voet LF, de Groot CJM, Bosmans JE, Huirne JAF; 2Close study group. Cost-effectiveness of single-layer versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 2;11(7):e044340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044340.
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
추가 관련 MeSH 약관
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 31/26
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
골반 통증에 대한 임상 시험
-
Al-Azhar UniversityUniversity Hospital Fattouma Bourguiba완전한
-
Bingol UniversityAtaturk University아직 모집하지 않음수술 전 불안 | 두려움 | PAIN
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York University; National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)모병
-
Istanbul University모병Masticatory Muscle Pain | 근시 통증 증후군 (MP)칠면조
-
Istanbul University모병이갈이 | 근막 통증 증후군 | Masticatory Muscle Pain | 현지 근육통터키 (Türkiye)