이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Effectiveness of Puppet Modeling During Dental Emergency Visits on Dental Anxiety and Behavior of Children in a Subsequent Visit

2026년 7월 25일 업데이트: Mariam Aldajani, King Abdulaziz University

Effect of Puppet-Aided Tell-Show-Do During Dental Emergency Visit on Dental Anxiety and Behavior of Children in a Subsequent Visit: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using a puppet in dental visits for children is an effective behavior guidance tool. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does using a puppet to explain dental procedures to children during emergency dental visits lower their anxiety in a subsequent dental visit?
  • Does using a puppet to explain dental procedures to children during emergency dental visits improve their behavior in a subsequent dental visit?

Researchers compared the effect of using a puppet to the traditional tell-show-do behavior guidance technique to see if the puppet is more effective in lowering their anxiety and improving their behavior.

Participants were randomly allocated into two groups:

  • Group I: Children who received puppet play therapy in the emergency dental visit and in the subsequent dental visit.
  • Group II: Children who received only the traditional tell-show-do behavior guidance technique in the emergency dental visit and in the subsequent dental visit.

연구 개요

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

66

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 어린이

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy (including healthy children presenting with a localized dental abscess and no systemic involvement),
  • Arabic-speaking
  • and required emergency dental treatment under local anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA II or higher according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification,
  • or if they required advanced behavior guidance, such as protective stabilization, during the emergency visit.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 지지 요법
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Puppet-aided TSD
Children who received puppet-aided tell-show-do as a behavior guidance technique in the emergency dental visit.
The investigator used the puppet to interact with the participants and explain the treatment in simple language before starting the dental procedure.
다른 이름들:
  • Puppet Guidance
활성 비교기: TSD
Children who received traditional tell-show-do as a behavior guidance technique in the emergency dental visit.

Tell: The dentist explained what is about to happen using simple, age-appropriate language.

Show: The dentist demonstrated the tool outside of the patient's mouth. Do: The dentist performed the procedure in the patient's mouth exactly as described.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Subjective Dental Anxiety as Assessed by Venham Picture Test (VPT) for Children Aged 3-5 Years
기간: 2 weeks after the intervention
The scale consists of eight pairs of images, each showing a child in both anxious and calm states. Children are asked to select one image from each pair that best represents how they feel. Each anxious image chosen is scored as one, while calm selections are scored as zero. The total dental anxiety score, which ranges from zero to eight, is calculated by summing the individual scores, with higher totals indicating greater anxiety.
2 weeks after the intervention
Subjective Dental Anxiety as Assessed by Abeer Children Dental Anxiety Scale (ACDAS) for Children Aged 6-9 Years
기간: 2 weeks after the intervention
The scale is divided into three sections. Part A includes 13 self-reported items presented in a logical sequence, in which children indicate their feelings toward different dental situations using three facial expressions: happy/relaxed (score = 1), neutral/ "OK" (score = 2), and scared/anxious (score = 3). The total score ranges from 13 to 39; scores ≥26 indicate significant dental anxiety. Part B consists of three yes/no questions exploring the child's cognitive concerns, such as shyness about their teeth or dentist, and fear of losing control during treatment. Part C gathers additional information from both the parent/guardian and the dentist: parents report on the child's previous dental experiences and anticipated behavior, while the dentist records the child's behavior after treatment. By combining self-reported, parental, and clinical perspectives, ACDAS provides a comprehensive assessment of dental anxiety in children
2 weeks after the intervention
Objective Dental Anxiety as Assessed by the Venham Anxiety Rating Scale (VARS)
기간: 2 weeks after the intervention
The VARS is constructed of six behaviorally defined categories that range from zero to five, with higher scores indicating higher levels of dental anxiety. The score gradually increases from relaxed (Score 0), to the child is totally out of control (Score 5). The target population for this scale is children aged 3-12 years.
2 weeks after the intervention
Behavior as Assessed by the Behavior Profile Rating Scale (BPRS)
기간: 2 weeks after the intervention

An independent observer, other than the operating dentist, is required to systematically record the occurrence of 27 distinct behavioral aspects over a series of 3-minute intervals. Four of these behaviors assess the child's reaction to his separation from a parent. The remaining 23 aspects assess the child's behavior in the dental office. Each behavior is assigned a weighted score that reflects its level of disruptiveness. The total score is calculated by multiplying the frequency of each behavior during the 3-minute periods by its weight, then summing the results across all categories and dividing by the number of intervals.

In this study, the BPRS was adapted to be applied once per quadrant during oral prophylaxis, rather than at fixed 3-minute intervals, because the procedure was short and, in some cases, did not extend to three minutes.

2 weeks after the intervention

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Behavior as Assessed by the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (FBRS)
기간: immediately after the procedure
This scale classifies patient behavior into four specific categories.:Definitely Negative (Rating 1): The child completely refuses treatment, cries forcefully, shows extreme fear, or displays overt negativism.Negative (Rating 2): The child is reluctant to accept treatment and uncooperative, but there is no extreme negativism (e.g., no forceful crying or treatment refusal).Positive (Rating 3): The child accepts treatment and is generally willing to comply with the dentist's directions, though they may be a bit cautious or reserved.Definitely Positive (Rating 4): The child has excellent rapport with the dentist, shows genuine interest in the procedure, laughs, and enjoys the visit.
immediately after the procedure

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

일반 간행물

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2024년 2월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2025년 6월 30일

연구 완료 (실제)

2025년 6월 30일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 7월 22일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 7월 25일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 30일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 30일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 7월 25일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 119-06-23

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

예

IPD 계획 설명

Data will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형

  • 연구_프로토콜
  • 수액
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다