此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Effectiveness of Puppet Modeling During Dental Emergency Visits on Dental Anxiety and Behavior of Children in a Subsequent Visit

2026年7月25日 更新者:Mariam Aldajani、King Abdulaziz University

Effect of Puppet-Aided Tell-Show-Do During Dental Emergency Visit on Dental Anxiety and Behavior of Children in a Subsequent Visit: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using a puppet in dental visits for children is an effective behavior guidance tool. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does using a puppet to explain dental procedures to children during emergency dental visits lower their anxiety in a subsequent dental visit?
  • Does using a puppet to explain dental procedures to children during emergency dental visits improve their behavior in a subsequent dental visit?

Researchers compared the effect of using a puppet to the traditional tell-show-do behavior guidance technique to see if the puppet is more effective in lowering their anxiety and improving their behavior.

Participants were randomly allocated into two groups:

  • Group I: Children who received puppet play therapy in the emergency dental visit and in the subsequent dental visit.
  • Group II: Children who received only the traditional tell-show-do behavior guidance technique in the emergency dental visit and in the subsequent dental visit.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

66

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Jeddah、沙特阿拉伯
        • King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy (including healthy children presenting with a localized dental abscess and no systemic involvement),
  • Arabic-speaking
  • and required emergency dental treatment under local anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA II or higher according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification,
  • or if they required advanced behavior guidance, such as protective stabilization, during the emergency visit.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Puppet-aided TSD
Children who received puppet-aided tell-show-do as a behavior guidance technique in the emergency dental visit.
The investigator used the puppet to interact with the participants and explain the treatment in simple language before starting the dental procedure.
其他名称:
  • Puppet Guidance
有源比较器:TSD
Children who received traditional tell-show-do as a behavior guidance technique in the emergency dental visit.

Tell: The dentist explained what is about to happen using simple, age-appropriate language.

Show: The dentist demonstrated the tool outside of the patient's mouth. Do: The dentist performed the procedure in the patient's mouth exactly as described.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Subjective Dental Anxiety as Assessed by Venham Picture Test (VPT) for Children Aged 3-5 Years
大体时间:2 weeks after the intervention
The scale consists of eight pairs of images, each showing a child in both anxious and calm states. Children are asked to select one image from each pair that best represents how they feel. Each anxious image chosen is scored as one, while calm selections are scored as zero. The total dental anxiety score, which ranges from zero to eight, is calculated by summing the individual scores, with higher totals indicating greater anxiety.
2 weeks after the intervention
Subjective Dental Anxiety as Assessed by Abeer Children Dental Anxiety Scale (ACDAS) for Children Aged 6-9 Years
大体时间:2 weeks after the intervention
The scale is divided into three sections. Part A includes 13 self-reported items presented in a logical sequence, in which children indicate their feelings toward different dental situations using three facial expressions: happy/relaxed (score = 1), neutral/ "OK" (score = 2), and scared/anxious (score = 3). The total score ranges from 13 to 39; scores ≥26 indicate significant dental anxiety. Part B consists of three yes/no questions exploring the child's cognitive concerns, such as shyness about their teeth or dentist, and fear of losing control during treatment. Part C gathers additional information from both the parent/guardian and the dentist: parents report on the child's previous dental experiences and anticipated behavior, while the dentist records the child's behavior after treatment. By combining self-reported, parental, and clinical perspectives, ACDAS provides a comprehensive assessment of dental anxiety in children
2 weeks after the intervention
Objective Dental Anxiety as Assessed by the Venham Anxiety Rating Scale (VARS)
大体时间:2 weeks after the intervention
The VARS is constructed of six behaviorally defined categories that range from zero to five, with higher scores indicating higher levels of dental anxiety. The score gradually increases from relaxed (Score 0), to the child is totally out of control (Score 5). The target population for this scale is children aged 3-12 years.
2 weeks after the intervention
Behavior as Assessed by the Behavior Profile Rating Scale (BPRS)
大体时间:2 weeks after the intervention

An independent observer, other than the operating dentist, is required to systematically record the occurrence of 27 distinct behavioral aspects over a series of 3-minute intervals. Four of these behaviors assess the child's reaction to his separation from a parent. The remaining 23 aspects assess the child's behavior in the dental office. Each behavior is assigned a weighted score that reflects its level of disruptiveness. The total score is calculated by multiplying the frequency of each behavior during the 3-minute periods by its weight, then summing the results across all categories and dividing by the number of intervals.

In this study, the BPRS was adapted to be applied once per quadrant during oral prophylaxis, rather than at fixed 3-minute intervals, because the procedure was short and, in some cases, did not extend to three minutes.

2 weeks after the intervention

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Behavior as Assessed by the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (FBRS)
大体时间:immediately after the procedure
This scale classifies patient behavior into four specific categories.:Definitely Negative (Rating 1): The child completely refuses treatment, cries forcefully, shows extreme fear, or displays overt negativism.Negative (Rating 2): The child is reluctant to accept treatment and uncooperative, but there is no extreme negativism (e.g., no forceful crying or treatment refusal).Positive (Rating 3): The child accepts treatment and is generally willing to comply with the dentist's directions, though they may be a bit cautious or reserved.Definitely Positive (Rating 4): The child has excellent rapport with the dentist, shows genuine interest in the procedure, laughs, and enjoys the visit.
immediately after the procedure

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2024年2月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2025年6月30日

研究完成 (实际的)

2025年6月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月25日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月30日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月30日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月25日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 119-06-23

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

Data will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 树液
  • 国际碳纤维联合会
  • 分析代码
  • 企业社会责任

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅