Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Effectiveness of Puppet Modeling During Dental Emergency Visits on Dental Anxiety and Behavior of Children in a Subsequent Visit

25 juli 2026 bijgewerkt door: Mariam Aldajani, King Abdulaziz University

Effect of Puppet-Aided Tell-Show-Do During Dental Emergency Visit on Dental Anxiety and Behavior of Children in a Subsequent Visit: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using a puppet in dental visits for children is an effective behavior guidance tool. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does using a puppet to explain dental procedures to children during emergency dental visits lower their anxiety in a subsequent dental visit?
  • Does using a puppet to explain dental procedures to children during emergency dental visits improve their behavior in a subsequent dental visit?

Researchers compared the effect of using a puppet to the traditional tell-show-do behavior guidance technique to see if the puppet is more effective in lowering their anxiety and improving their behavior.

Participants were randomly allocated into two groups:

  • Group I: Children who received puppet play therapy in the emergency dental visit and in the subsequent dental visit.
  • Group II: Children who received only the traditional tell-show-do behavior guidance technique in the emergency dental visit and in the subsequent dental visit.

Studie Overzicht

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

66

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

      • Jeddah, Saoedi-Arabië
        • King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Kind

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Ja

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy (including healthy children presenting with a localized dental abscess and no systemic involvement),
  • Arabic-speaking
  • and required emergency dental treatment under local anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA II or higher according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification,
  • or if they required advanced behavior guidance, such as protective stabilization, during the emergency visit.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Ondersteunende zorg
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Puppet-aided TSD
Children who received puppet-aided tell-show-do as a behavior guidance technique in the emergency dental visit.
The investigator used the puppet to interact with the participants and explain the treatment in simple language before starting the dental procedure.
Andere namen:
  • Puppet Guidance
Actieve vergelijker: TSD
Children who received traditional tell-show-do as a behavior guidance technique in the emergency dental visit.

Tell: The dentist explained what is about to happen using simple, age-appropriate language.

Show: The dentist demonstrated the tool outside of the patient's mouth. Do: The dentist performed the procedure in the patient's mouth exactly as described.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Subjective Dental Anxiety as Assessed by Venham Picture Test (VPT) for Children Aged 3-5 Years
Tijdsspanne: 2 weeks after the intervention
The scale consists of eight pairs of images, each showing a child in both anxious and calm states. Children are asked to select one image from each pair that best represents how they feel. Each anxious image chosen is scored as one, while calm selections are scored as zero. The total dental anxiety score, which ranges from zero to eight, is calculated by summing the individual scores, with higher totals indicating greater anxiety.
2 weeks after the intervention
Subjective Dental Anxiety as Assessed by Abeer Children Dental Anxiety Scale (ACDAS) for Children Aged 6-9 Years
Tijdsspanne: 2 weeks after the intervention
The scale is divided into three sections. Part A includes 13 self-reported items presented in a logical sequence, in which children indicate their feelings toward different dental situations using three facial expressions: happy/relaxed (score = 1), neutral/ "OK" (score = 2), and scared/anxious (score = 3). The total score ranges from 13 to 39; scores ≥26 indicate significant dental anxiety. Part B consists of three yes/no questions exploring the child's cognitive concerns, such as shyness about their teeth or dentist, and fear of losing control during treatment. Part C gathers additional information from both the parent/guardian and the dentist: parents report on the child's previous dental experiences and anticipated behavior, while the dentist records the child's behavior after treatment. By combining self-reported, parental, and clinical perspectives, ACDAS provides a comprehensive assessment of dental anxiety in children
2 weeks after the intervention
Objective Dental Anxiety as Assessed by the Venham Anxiety Rating Scale (VARS)
Tijdsspanne: 2 weeks after the intervention
The VARS is constructed of six behaviorally defined categories that range from zero to five, with higher scores indicating higher levels of dental anxiety. The score gradually increases from relaxed (Score 0), to the child is totally out of control (Score 5). The target population for this scale is children aged 3-12 years.
2 weeks after the intervention
Behavior as Assessed by the Behavior Profile Rating Scale (BPRS)
Tijdsspanne: 2 weeks after the intervention

An independent observer, other than the operating dentist, is required to systematically record the occurrence of 27 distinct behavioral aspects over a series of 3-minute intervals. Four of these behaviors assess the child's reaction to his separation from a parent. The remaining 23 aspects assess the child's behavior in the dental office. Each behavior is assigned a weighted score that reflects its level of disruptiveness. The total score is calculated by multiplying the frequency of each behavior during the 3-minute periods by its weight, then summing the results across all categories and dividing by the number of intervals.

In this study, the BPRS was adapted to be applied once per quadrant during oral prophylaxis, rather than at fixed 3-minute intervals, because the procedure was short and, in some cases, did not extend to three minutes.

2 weeks after the intervention

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Behavior as Assessed by the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (FBRS)
Tijdsspanne: immediately after the procedure
This scale classifies patient behavior into four specific categories.:Definitely Negative (Rating 1): The child completely refuses treatment, cries forcefully, shows extreme fear, or displays overt negativism.Negative (Rating 2): The child is reluctant to accept treatment and uncooperative, but there is no extreme negativism (e.g., no forceful crying or treatment refusal).Positive (Rating 3): The child accepts treatment and is generally willing to comply with the dentist's directions, though they may be a bit cautious or reserved.Definitely Positive (Rating 4): The child has excellent rapport with the dentist, shows genuine interest in the procedure, laughs, and enjoys the visit.
immediately after the procedure

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Algemene publicaties

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

1 februari 2024

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

30 juni 2025

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

30 juni 2025

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

22 juli 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

25 juli 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

30 juli 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

30 juli 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

25 juli 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 juli 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • 119-06-23

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

JA

Beschrijving IPD-plan

Data will be shared upon reasonable request.

IPD delen Ondersteunend informatietype

  • LEERPROTOCOOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • MVO

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren