Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Collaborative Efforts to Increase Flu Vaccination (CollabFlu)

29 mei 2015 bijgewerkt door: University of Colorado, Denver

Strategies to Vaccinate All Children for Influenza in a Practice Setting

Beginning with the 2009-2010 season, influenza vaccine is universally recommended for children age 6 months to 18 years old, placing extra burden on health care providers across the U.S. The focus of this study is to develop new strategies and implement existing evidence-based strategies to enhance influenza immunization in these children. The intervention will involve collaboration from different types of primary care providers, the Colorado Immunization Information System (CIIS), public health departments and visiting nursing services (VNA). It will be designed and implemented by those involved with delivery with a focus on sustainability after the completion of the study. Parental input will be gathered during the planning year through focus groups to assist in developing the intervention. Qualitative assessments and examination of processes during the first year of implementation will guide modifications during the second implementation year in order to assure sustainability. Primary outcome measures in the intervention and control groups: 1) increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 mo.-18 yr. and 2) increase in the rate of children 6 mo.-18 yr. who were fully immunized (received all required influenza injections) during the season. 3) measure outcomes by age group (6 mo.-5 yr., 6-8 yr., 9-12 yr., 13-18 yr.) and types of clinical sites (urban Peds, urban FM, rural FM)

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Specific Aim 1: Within each of three types of clinical sites (urban pediatric, urban family medicine, and rural family medicine) recruit a group of similar practices (Year 1) 1a. Randomize practices within each type of clinical site to either the intervention or the control group

1b. Establish private-public collaborations for influenza vaccination delivery between county public health departments, visiting nursing associations and each of the intervention practices within the three clinical site types

Specific Aim 2: Conduct focus groups among parents of children seen at intervention practices, to assess attitudes and perceived barriers to possible practice-based and collaborative strategies to promote influenza vaccination (Year 1)

Specific Aim 3: Develop (Year 1) and implement (Years 2 and 3) a plan for comprehensive and collaborative delivery of influenza vaccine at intervention practices 3a. Develop practice-based intervention strategies focusing primarily on immunization of high-risk patients 3b. Develop private-public collaborative interventions between the intervention practices, their county public health department and visiting nursing associations focusing primarily on immunization of school-aged children 3c. Implement (Years 2 and 3) both practice-based and private-public collaborative strategies in the intervention practices while monitoring only in the control practices

Specific Aim 4: Conduct a group-randomized trial to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the comprehensive delivery model in improving influenza vaccination coverage for children 6 months to 18 years in three different types of clinical sites (urban pediatric, urban family medicine, and rural family medicine).

4a. Evaluate effectiveness of the comprehensive delivery model at each of the three types of clinical sites

  1. Compare the following primary outcome measures in the intervention and control groups: 1) increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years and 2) increase in the rate of children 6 months to 18 years who were fully immunized (received all required influenza injections) during the season.
  2. Compare the following secondary outcome measures: 1) increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among high-risk children and 2) increase in the rate of high-risk children who were fully immunized during the season.
  3. Evaluate sustainability of the comprehensive delivery model on the above outcome measures

4b. Compare the effectiveness of the comprehensive delivery model in three different types of clinical sites (urban pediatric private practice, urban family medicine private practice, and rural family medicine private practice)

Specific Aim 5: Evaluate the process of implementation of the comprehensive delivery model for influenza delivery in each of the three types of sites.

5a. Assess process measures relevant to implementation of practice-based interventions and compare by type of clinical site 5b. Assess process measures relevant to implementation of private-public collaborative interventions and compare by type of clinical site 5c. Using key informant interviews, assess perceptions regarding facilitators and barriers to private-public collaborative delivery, alternative methods and means of improving the process among practice providers, administrators and among participating public health and visiting nurse personnel

Specific Aim 6: In two urban pediatric intervention practices and one rural family medicine practice, conduct surveys examining parental attitudes about methods of influenza delivery and their experience with their practice's participation in a comprehensive and collaborative private-public model for influenza delivery

Major Hypotheses:

SA4. Hypothesis 1. Effectiveness on receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine: The increase in the likelihood of receiving ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for children in intervention practices than in control practices.

SA4. Hypothesis 2 Effectiveness - fully immunized: The increase in the likelihood of receiving all necessary influenza vaccines during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for children in intervention practices than in control practices.

SA4. Hypothesis 3. Effectiveness by age strata: The increase in the likelihood of receiving ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children in each of the following age strata will be greater in intervention than in control practices: 1) 6 months through 5 years; 2) 6 through 8 years; 3) 9 through 12 years; 4) 13 through 18 years.

SA4. Hypothesis 4. Effectiveness in high-risk children: The increase in the likelihood of receiving of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among high-risk children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for high-risk children in intervention practices than in control practices.

SA4. Hypothesis 5. Sustainability: The increase in the likelihood of receiving ≥1 influenza vaccine during the second post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for children in intervention practices than in control practices. (Sustainability will also be evaluated for other outcomes above.)

SA4. Hypothesis 6. Differential effectiveness by clinical site type: The increase in the likelihood of receiving of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years for intervention vs. controls will differ by clinical site type

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

117175

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

  • Verenigde Staten
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80010
        • Tri County Health dept
      • Aurora, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80012
        • Aurora Family Medicine
      • Aurora, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80014
        • Forum Family Medicine
      • Brighton, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80601
        • Premier Pediatrics
      • Broomfield, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80021
        • Indian Crest Pediatrics
      • Centennial, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80112
        • Pediatrics 5280
      • Centennial, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80014
        • Centennial Pediatrics
      • Centennial, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80015
        • Advanced Pediatrics
      • Centennial, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80112
        • Greenwood Pediatrics
      • Centennial, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80112
        • Pediatric Pathways
      • Denver, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80246
        • CIIS
      • Englewood, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80113
        • Hampden Medical Group
      • Ft. Morgan, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80701
        • Family Practice Clinic
      • Ft. Morgan, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80701
        • Ft. Morgan Medical Group
      • Haxtun, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80731
        • Haxtun Family Medicine
      • Julesburg, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80737
        • Valley Medical Center
      • Lakewood, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80215
        • Jefferson County Health dept
      • Lakewood, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80226
        • Kids First
      • Lakewood, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80401
        • Denver West Pediatrics
      • Littleton, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80123
        • Focus on Kids
      • Lone Tree, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80124
        • Lone Tree Family Medicine
      • Parker, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80138
        • Crown Point Pediatrics
      • Sterling, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80751
        • Northeast County Health Dept
      • Thornton, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80260
        • Mountain Land Pediatrics
      • Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80033
        • Pediatrics West
      • Wray, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80758
        • Wray Clinic
      • Yuma, Colorado, Verenigde Staten, 80759
        • Yuma Clinic

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

6 maanden tot 18 jaar (Kind, Volwassen)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children age 6 mo - 18 yr in up to 20 practices

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants under the age of 6 mo or adults over the age of 18

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Increasing flu vaccination
Collect from billing records in the 10 intervention practice sites to test for an increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years during the season. The interventions include: 1. Develop practice-based intervention strategies (like use of reminder-recall of children due for influenza,2. Develop Private/public collaboration to increase flu vaccination between the intervention practices, their county public health department and visiting nursing associations, and 3. Implement both practice-based and private-public collaborative strategies in the intervention practices while monitoring only in the control practices
Gedragsmatig: Private/public collaboration to increase flu vaccination
Intervention practices will develop office-based interventions including methods to identify high-risk patients within their practices and methods of maximizing the immunization of these children within the practice, use of patient reminders, after-hours influenza clinics, walk-in provision of influenza vaccine and increased focus on education regarding the need for immunization. The practices will also collaborate with their county public health departments and visiting nursing associations to develop private-public collaborative interventions that may include large clinics for school-aged children for multiple practices and tracking of influenza supplies and redistribution of influenza vaccine between practices when supplies are delayed or inadequate.
Ander: Usual care
Patients in control practices will continue to receive usual care with no change in practice regarding influenza immunization delivery.
Ander: Usual care
This group will continue administering influenza vaccine to their patients in their practice as they normally do.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Evaluate the effectiveness of collaborations between public and private entities to increase influenza vaccination in children 6 mos to 18 yrs in 10 intervention sites in 3 counties throughout the state of CO during the '10-11 & '11-12 flu seasons.
Tijdsspanne: Up to 4 months post intervention (December 2012)
Primary outcome measure is to increase the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year(s) compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 mos.-18 yrs in 10 intervention sites. Intervention practices will collaborate with their respective health departments and/or the VNA to help assist with the increase in volume of patients needing to be vaccinated against flu in the 2010-2011 and the 2011-2012 flu seasons. Billing data will be obtained from all 20 sites (intervention+control) and compared to evaluate the effectiveness of this collaboration.
Up to 4 months post intervention (December 2012)

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
high-risk children receipt of influenza vaccination
Tijdsspanne: baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among high-risk children
baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
high-risk children fully immunized during influenza season
Tijdsspanne: baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
increase in the rate of high-risk children who were fully immunized during the season.
baseline and intervention years 1 and 2

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver

Medewerkers

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Allison Kempe, MD, MPH, University of Colorado, Children's Hospital

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 augustus 2009

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 februari 2015

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 maart 2015

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

14 juli 2011

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

25 juli 2011

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

27 juli 2011

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)

2 juni 2015

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

29 mei 2015

Laatst geverifieerd

1 mei 2015

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • 10-0589
  • 1U01IP000320 (Subsidie/contract van de Amerikaanse NIH)

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren