Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Collaborative Efforts to Increase Flu Vaccination (CollabFlu)

29 de mayo de 2015 actualizado por: University of Colorado, Denver

Strategies to Vaccinate All Children for Influenza in a Practice Setting

Beginning with the 2009-2010 season, influenza vaccine is universally recommended for children age 6 months to 18 years old, placing extra burden on health care providers across the U.S. The focus of this study is to develop new strategies and implement existing evidence-based strategies to enhance influenza immunization in these children. The intervention will involve collaboration from different types of primary care providers, the Colorado Immunization Information System (CIIS), public health departments and visiting nursing services (VNA). It will be designed and implemented by those involved with delivery with a focus on sustainability after the completion of the study. Parental input will be gathered during the planning year through focus groups to assist in developing the intervention. Qualitative assessments and examination of processes during the first year of implementation will guide modifications during the second implementation year in order to assure sustainability. Primary outcome measures in the intervention and control groups: 1) increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 mo.-18 yr. and 2) increase in the rate of children 6 mo.-18 yr. who were fully immunized (received all required influenza injections) during the season. 3) measure outcomes by age group (6 mo.-5 yr., 6-8 yr., 9-12 yr., 13-18 yr.) and types of clinical sites (urban Peds, urban FM, rural FM)

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Specific Aim 1: Within each of three types of clinical sites (urban pediatric, urban family medicine, and rural family medicine) recruit a group of similar practices (Year 1) 1a. Randomize practices within each type of clinical site to either the intervention or the control group

1b. Establish private-public collaborations for influenza vaccination delivery between county public health departments, visiting nursing associations and each of the intervention practices within the three clinical site types

Specific Aim 2: Conduct focus groups among parents of children seen at intervention practices, to assess attitudes and perceived barriers to possible practice-based and collaborative strategies to promote influenza vaccination (Year 1)

Specific Aim 3: Develop (Year 1) and implement (Years 2 and 3) a plan for comprehensive and collaborative delivery of influenza vaccine at intervention practices 3a. Develop practice-based intervention strategies focusing primarily on immunization of high-risk patients 3b. Develop private-public collaborative interventions between the intervention practices, their county public health department and visiting nursing associations focusing primarily on immunization of school-aged children 3c. Implement (Years 2 and 3) both practice-based and private-public collaborative strategies in the intervention practices while monitoring only in the control practices

Specific Aim 4: Conduct a group-randomized trial to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the comprehensive delivery model in improving influenza vaccination coverage for children 6 months to 18 years in three different types of clinical sites (urban pediatric, urban family medicine, and rural family medicine).

4a. Evaluate effectiveness of the comprehensive delivery model at each of the three types of clinical sites

  1. Compare the following primary outcome measures in the intervention and control groups: 1) increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years and 2) increase in the rate of children 6 months to 18 years who were fully immunized (received all required influenza injections) during the season.
  2. Compare the following secondary outcome measures: 1) increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among high-risk children and 2) increase in the rate of high-risk children who were fully immunized during the season.
  3. Evaluate sustainability of the comprehensive delivery model on the above outcome measures

4b. Compare the effectiveness of the comprehensive delivery model in three different types of clinical sites (urban pediatric private practice, urban family medicine private practice, and rural family medicine private practice)

Specific Aim 5: Evaluate the process of implementation of the comprehensive delivery model for influenza delivery in each of the three types of sites.

5a. Assess process measures relevant to implementation of practice-based interventions and compare by type of clinical site 5b. Assess process measures relevant to implementation of private-public collaborative interventions and compare by type of clinical site 5c. Using key informant interviews, assess perceptions regarding facilitators and barriers to private-public collaborative delivery, alternative methods and means of improving the process among practice providers, administrators and among participating public health and visiting nurse personnel

Specific Aim 6: In two urban pediatric intervention practices and one rural family medicine practice, conduct surveys examining parental attitudes about methods of influenza delivery and their experience with their practice's participation in a comprehensive and collaborative private-public model for influenza delivery

Major Hypotheses:

SA4. Hypothesis 1. Effectiveness on receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine: The increase in the likelihood of receiving ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for children in intervention practices than in control practices.

SA4. Hypothesis 2 Effectiveness - fully immunized: The increase in the likelihood of receiving all necessary influenza vaccines during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for children in intervention practices than in control practices.

SA4. Hypothesis 3. Effectiveness by age strata: The increase in the likelihood of receiving ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children in each of the following age strata will be greater in intervention than in control practices: 1) 6 months through 5 years; 2) 6 through 8 years; 3) 9 through 12 years; 4) 13 through 18 years.

SA4. Hypothesis 4. Effectiveness in high-risk children: The increase in the likelihood of receiving of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among high-risk children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for high-risk children in intervention practices than in control practices.

SA4. Hypothesis 5. Sustainability: The increase in the likelihood of receiving ≥1 influenza vaccine during the second post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for children in intervention practices than in control practices. (Sustainability will also be evaluated for other outcomes above.)

SA4. Hypothesis 6. Differential effectiveness by clinical site type: The increase in the likelihood of receiving of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years for intervention vs. controls will differ by clinical site type

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

117175

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80010
        • Tri County Health dept
      • Aurora, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80012
        • Aurora Family Medicine
      • Aurora, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80014
        • Forum Family Medicine
      • Brighton, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80601
        • Premier Pediatrics
      • Broomfield, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80021
        • Indian Crest Pediatrics
      • Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80112
        • Pediatrics 5280
      • Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80014
        • Centennial Pediatrics
      • Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80015
        • Advanced Pediatrics
      • Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80112
        • Greenwood Pediatrics
      • Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80112
        • Pediatric Pathways
      • Denver, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80246
        • CIIS
      • Englewood, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80113
        • Hampden Medical Group
      • Ft. Morgan, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80701
        • Family Practice Clinic
      • Ft. Morgan, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80701
        • Ft. Morgan Medical Group
      • Haxtun, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80731
        • Haxtun Family Medicine
      • Julesburg, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80737
        • Valley Medical Center
      • Lakewood, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80215
        • Jefferson County Health dept
      • Lakewood, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80226
        • Kids First
      • Lakewood, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80401
        • Denver West Pediatrics
      • Littleton, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80123
        • Focus on Kids
      • Lone Tree, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80124
        • Lone Tree Family Medicine
      • Parker, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80138
        • Crown Point Pediatrics
      • Sterling, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80751
        • Northeast County Health Dept
      • Thornton, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80260
        • Mountain Land Pediatrics
      • Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80033
        • Pediatrics West
      • Wray, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80758
        • Wray Clinic
      • Yuma, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80759
        • Yuma Clinic

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

6 meses a 18 años (Niño, Adulto)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children age 6 mo - 18 yr in up to 20 practices

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants under the age of 6 mo or adults over the age of 18

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Increasing flu vaccination
Collect from billing records in the 10 intervention practice sites to test for an increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years during the season. The interventions include: 1. Develop practice-based intervention strategies (like use of reminder-recall of children due for influenza,2. Develop Private/public collaboration to increase flu vaccination between the intervention practices, their county public health department and visiting nursing associations, and 3. Implement both practice-based and private-public collaborative strategies in the intervention practices while monitoring only in the control practices
Intervention practices will develop office-based interventions including methods to identify high-risk patients within their practices and methods of maximizing the immunization of these children within the practice, use of patient reminders, after-hours influenza clinics, walk-in provision of influenza vaccine and increased focus on education regarding the need for immunization. The practices will also collaborate with their county public health departments and visiting nursing associations to develop private-public collaborative interventions that may include large clinics for school-aged children for multiple practices and tracking of influenza supplies and redistribution of influenza vaccine between practices when supplies are delayed or inadequate.
Otro: Usual care
Patients in control practices will continue to receive usual care with no change in practice regarding influenza immunization delivery.
This group will continue administering influenza vaccine to their patients in their practice as they normally do.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Evaluate the effectiveness of collaborations between public and private entities to increase influenza vaccination in children 6 mos to 18 yrs in 10 intervention sites in 3 counties throughout the state of CO during the '10-11 & '11-12 flu seasons.
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 4 months post intervention (December 2012)
Primary outcome measure is to increase the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year(s) compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 mos.-18 yrs in 10 intervention sites. Intervention practices will collaborate with their respective health departments and/or the VNA to help assist with the increase in volume of patients needing to be vaccinated against flu in the 2010-2011 and the 2011-2012 flu seasons. Billing data will be obtained from all 20 sites (intervention+control) and compared to evaluate the effectiveness of this collaboration.
Up to 4 months post intervention (December 2012)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
high-risk children receipt of influenza vaccination
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among high-risk children
baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
high-risk children fully immunized during influenza season
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
increase in the rate of high-risk children who were fully immunized during the season.
baseline and intervention years 1 and 2

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Allison Kempe, MD, MPH, University of Colorado, Children's Hospital

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de agosto de 2009

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de febrero de 2015

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2015

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

14 de julio de 2011

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de julio de 2011

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

27 de julio de 2011

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

2 de junio de 2015

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de mayo de 2015

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2015

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 10-0589
  • 1U01IP000320 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir