- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT01403649
Collaborative Efforts to Increase Flu Vaccination (CollabFlu)
Strategies to Vaccinate All Children for Influenza in a Practice Setting
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Specific Aim 1: Within each of three types of clinical sites (urban pediatric, urban family medicine, and rural family medicine) recruit a group of similar practices (Year 1) 1a. Randomize practices within each type of clinical site to either the intervention or the control group
1b. Establish private-public collaborations for influenza vaccination delivery between county public health departments, visiting nursing associations and each of the intervention practices within the three clinical site types
Specific Aim 2: Conduct focus groups among parents of children seen at intervention practices, to assess attitudes and perceived barriers to possible practice-based and collaborative strategies to promote influenza vaccination (Year 1)
Specific Aim 3: Develop (Year 1) and implement (Years 2 and 3) a plan for comprehensive and collaborative delivery of influenza vaccine at intervention practices 3a. Develop practice-based intervention strategies focusing primarily on immunization of high-risk patients 3b. Develop private-public collaborative interventions between the intervention practices, their county public health department and visiting nursing associations focusing primarily on immunization of school-aged children 3c. Implement (Years 2 and 3) both practice-based and private-public collaborative strategies in the intervention practices while monitoring only in the control practices
Specific Aim 4: Conduct a group-randomized trial to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the comprehensive delivery model in improving influenza vaccination coverage for children 6 months to 18 years in three different types of clinical sites (urban pediatric, urban family medicine, and rural family medicine).
4a. Evaluate effectiveness of the comprehensive delivery model at each of the three types of clinical sites
- Compare the following primary outcome measures in the intervention and control groups: 1) increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years and 2) increase in the rate of children 6 months to 18 years who were fully immunized (received all required influenza injections) during the season.
- Compare the following secondary outcome measures: 1) increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among high-risk children and 2) increase in the rate of high-risk children who were fully immunized during the season.
- Evaluate sustainability of the comprehensive delivery model on the above outcome measures
4b. Compare the effectiveness of the comprehensive delivery model in three different types of clinical sites (urban pediatric private practice, urban family medicine private practice, and rural family medicine private practice)
Specific Aim 5: Evaluate the process of implementation of the comprehensive delivery model for influenza delivery in each of the three types of sites.
5a. Assess process measures relevant to implementation of practice-based interventions and compare by type of clinical site 5b. Assess process measures relevant to implementation of private-public collaborative interventions and compare by type of clinical site 5c. Using key informant interviews, assess perceptions regarding facilitators and barriers to private-public collaborative delivery, alternative methods and means of improving the process among practice providers, administrators and among participating public health and visiting nurse personnel
Specific Aim 6: In two urban pediatric intervention practices and one rural family medicine practice, conduct surveys examining parental attitudes about methods of influenza delivery and their experience with their practice's participation in a comprehensive and collaborative private-public model for influenza delivery
Major Hypotheses:
SA4. Hypothesis 1. Effectiveness on receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine: The increase in the likelihood of receiving ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for children in intervention practices than in control practices.
SA4. Hypothesis 2 Effectiveness - fully immunized: The increase in the likelihood of receiving all necessary influenza vaccines during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for children in intervention practices than in control practices.
SA4. Hypothesis 3. Effectiveness by age strata: The increase in the likelihood of receiving ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children in each of the following age strata will be greater in intervention than in control practices: 1) 6 months through 5 years; 2) 6 through 8 years; 3) 9 through 12 years; 4) 13 through 18 years.
SA4. Hypothesis 4. Effectiveness in high-risk children: The increase in the likelihood of receiving of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among high-risk children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for high-risk children in intervention practices than in control practices.
SA4. Hypothesis 5. Sustainability: The increase in the likelihood of receiving ≥1 influenza vaccine during the second post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years will be greater for children in intervention practices than in control practices. (Sustainability will also be evaluated for other outcomes above.)
SA4. Hypothesis 6. Differential effectiveness by clinical site type: The increase in the likelihood of receiving of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years for intervention vs. controls will differ by clinical site type
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80010
- Tri County Health dept
-
Aurora, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80012
- Aurora Family Medicine
-
Aurora, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80014
- Forum Family Medicine
-
Brighton, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80601
- Premier Pediatrics
-
Broomfield, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80021
- Indian Crest Pediatrics
-
Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80112
- Pediatrics 5280
-
Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80014
- Centennial Pediatrics
-
Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80015
- Advanced Pediatrics
-
Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80112
- Greenwood Pediatrics
-
Centennial, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80112
- Pediatric Pathways
-
Denver, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80246
- CIIS
-
Englewood, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80113
- Hampden Medical Group
-
Ft. Morgan, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80701
- Family Practice Clinic
-
Ft. Morgan, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80701
- Ft. Morgan Medical Group
-
Haxtun, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80731
- Haxtun Family Medicine
-
Julesburg, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80737
- Valley Medical Center
-
Lakewood, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80215
- Jefferson County Health dept
-
Lakewood, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80226
- Kids First
-
Lakewood, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80401
- Denver West Pediatrics
-
Littleton, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80123
- Focus on Kids
-
Lone Tree, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80124
- Lone Tree Family Medicine
-
Parker, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80138
- Crown Point Pediatrics
-
Sterling, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80751
- Northeast County Health Dept
-
Thornton, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80260
- Mountain Land Pediatrics
-
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80033
- Pediatrics West
-
Wray, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80758
- Wray Clinic
-
Yuma, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80759
- Yuma Clinic
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children age 6 mo - 18 yr in up to 20 practices
Exclusion Criteria:
- Infants under the age of 6 mo or adults over the age of 18
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Increasing flu vaccination
Collect from billing records in the 10 intervention practice sites to test for an increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 months to 18 years during the season.
The interventions include: 1. Develop practice-based intervention strategies (like use of reminder-recall of children due for influenza,2.
Develop Private/public collaboration to increase flu vaccination between the intervention practices, their county public health department and visiting nursing associations, and 3. Implement both practice-based and private-public collaborative strategies in the intervention practices while monitoring only in the control practices
|
Intervention practices will develop office-based interventions including methods to identify high-risk patients within their practices and methods of maximizing the immunization of these children within the practice, use of patient reminders, after-hours influenza clinics, walk-in provision of influenza vaccine and increased focus on education regarding the need for immunization.
The practices will also collaborate with their county public health departments and visiting nursing associations to develop private-public collaborative interventions that may include large clinics for school-aged children for multiple practices and tracking of influenza supplies and redistribution of influenza vaccine between practices when supplies are delayed or inadequate.
|
|
Otro: Usual care
Patients in control practices will continue to receive usual care with no change in practice regarding influenza immunization delivery.
|
This group will continue administering influenza vaccine to their patients in their practice as they normally do.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate the effectiveness of collaborations between public and private entities to increase influenza vaccination in children 6 mos to 18 yrs in 10 intervention sites in 3 counties throughout the state of CO during the '10-11 & '11-12 flu seasons.
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 4 months post intervention (December 2012)
|
Primary outcome measure is to increase the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year(s) compared to the pre-intervention year among children 6 mos.-18 yrs in 10 intervention sites.
Intervention practices will collaborate with their respective health departments and/or the VNA to help assist with the increase in volume of patients needing to be vaccinated against flu in the 2010-2011 and the 2011-2012 flu seasons.
Billing data will be obtained from all 20 sites (intervention+control) and compared to evaluate the effectiveness of this collaboration.
|
Up to 4 months post intervention (December 2012)
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
high-risk children receipt of influenza vaccination
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
|
increase in the rate of receipt of ≥1 influenza vaccine during the post-intervention year compared to the pre-intervention year among high-risk children
|
baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
|
|
high-risk children fully immunized during influenza season
Periodo de tiempo: baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
|
increase in the rate of high-risk children who were fully immunized during the season.
|
baseline and intervention years 1 and 2
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Allison Kempe, MD, MPH, University of Colorado, Children's Hospital
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Estimar)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 10-0589
- 1U01IP000320 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .