Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Real-Time fMRI Feedback Effects on Pain Perception

18 maart 2019 bijgewerkt door: Medical University of South Carolina
The purpose of this study is to determine whether real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging may be a viable treatment for chronic pain in the future.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Twenty-four healthy volunteers will undergo a series of four fMRI scanning sessions wherein thermal pain stimuli will be used to elicit activation of the pain neuro-matrix. All participants will undergo thermal pain threshold testing before and after fMRI scan. Participants will also rate the painfulness and unpleasantness of the thermal stimuli applied before fMRI and after fMRI. All participants will be given prompts to apply a set of cognitive pain-control strategies. Half of the participants will receive real-time fMRI feedback of activity in the Right Anterior Cingulate Cortex (rACC) and the other half will receive real-time fMRI feedback of activity in the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC). It is hypothesized that those receiving real-time feedback of brain activity thought to be involved with analgesic effects will demonstrate greater analgesia associated with the application of the cognitive control techniques after fMRI paradigm (decreased pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings and increased thermal pain thresholds) than those who are not given feedback before fMRI paradigm.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

20

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

  • Verenigde Staten
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, Verenigde Staten, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar tot 65 jaar (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Ja

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults ages 18-65

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical depression
  • Anxiety
  • Substance dependence or chronic pain
  • Ferrous metal implants
  • Cardiac pacemakers or other implanted medical devices that might be adversely impacted by the MRI scanner magnetic field

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Ander
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: ACC Real Time fMRI Feedback

Each participant will undergo thermal pain threshold assessments ten times using the Medoc Pathway System with MRI-compatible ATS Thermode (30mmX30mm; Medoc Inc, Israel). Participants will be instructed to "focus on the thermal stimuli" for the first 5 trials, and to engage in three cognitive pain inhibition strategies (Attention/Distraction Strategy, Stimulus Quality/Severity Strategy, and the Control Strategy.

The participants will be randomly assigned to receive Real Time fMRI Feedback of inverse activation in the rACC after each pain/rest block during the last 3 fMRI scans in the form of two simple thermometer images on the in-scanner computer display.
Gedragsmatig: Attention/Distraction Strategy
One of three Cognitive Pain Inhibition Strategies. The Participant will be instructed to attend away from the thermal stimulus (for example, to the other side of the body). Vividly imagine they are somewhere else, or engage in a high-demanding mental task such as counting backward by 7's or completing math problems to distract from the experience
Gedragsmatig: Stimulus Quality/Severity Strategy
One of three Cognitive Pain Inhibition Strategies. The Participant will be instructed to attempt to perceive the stimulus as a neutral sensory experience rather than pain. Attempt to perceive the stimulus as low intensity rather than high intensity.
Gedragsmatig: Control Strategy
One of three Cognitive Pain Inhibition Strategies. The Participant will be instructed to attempt to take control of their perception of the painful experience.
Experimenteel: PFC Real Time fMRI Feedback
Each participant will undergo thermal pain threshold assessments ten times using the Medoc Pathway System with MRI-compatible ATS Thermode (30mmX30mm; Medoc Inc, Israel). Participants will be instructed to "focus on the thermal stimuli" for the first 5 trials, and to engage in three cognitive pain inhibition strategies (Attention/Distraction Strategy, Stimulus Quality/Severity Strategy, and the Control Strategy. The participants will be randomly assigned to receive Real Time fMRI Feedback of inverse activation in the PFC after each pain/rest block during the last 3 fMRI scans in the form of two simple thermometer images on the in-scanner computer display.
Gedragsmatig: Attention/Distraction Strategy
One of three Cognitive Pain Inhibition Strategies. The Participant will be instructed to attend away from the thermal stimulus (for example, to the other side of the body). Vividly imagine they are somewhere else, or engage in a high-demanding mental task such as counting backward by 7's or completing math problems to distract from the experience
Gedragsmatig: Stimulus Quality/Severity Strategy
One of three Cognitive Pain Inhibition Strategies. The Participant will be instructed to attempt to perceive the stimulus as a neutral sensory experience rather than pain. Attempt to perceive the stimulus as low intensity rather than high intensity.
Gedragsmatig: Control Strategy
One of three Cognitive Pain Inhibition Strategies. The Participant will be instructed to attempt to take control of their perception of the painful experience.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Average Unpleasantness
Tijdsspanne: Before and After fMRI Paradigm, an average of 2 hours

All participants will undergo thermal pain threshold testing directly before (Baseline) and after MRI. Participants will be asked to rate pain unpleasantness, on a scale of 0-10, before the fMRI Paradigm (Baseline) and directly after the fMRI paradigm (after MRI).

0="no unpleasantness" and 10="worst unpleasantness imaginable"
Before and After fMRI Paradigm, an average of 2 hours
Average Pain Rating
Tijdsspanne: Before and After fMRI Paradigm, an average of 2 hours
All participants will undergo thermal pain threshold testing directly before (Baseline) and after MRI scan.Participants will be asked to rate painfulness of the thermal stimuli applied, on a scale of 0-10, before the fMRI Paradigm (Baseline) and directly after the fMRI paradigm (after MRI). 0="no pain" and 10="worst pain imaginable"
Before and After fMRI Paradigm, an average of 2 hours
Ability to Distract
Tijdsspanne: Before and After fMRI Paradigm, an average of 2 hours
All participants will undergo thermal pain threshold testing before and after fMRI paradigm. Participants will rate the ability to distract themselves from the thermal stimuli, on a scale of 0-10, before fMRI paradigm (Baseline) and after fMRI paradigm, 0="not able to distract at all" and 10="completely able to distract". A Higher rating represents greater ability to distract from thermal pain stimuli.
Before and After fMRI Paradigm, an average of 2 hours

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Jeffery J Borckardt, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

1 november 2010

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 december 2016

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 december 2016

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

10 februari 2012

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

26 april 2012

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

30 april 2012

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

14 juni 2019

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

18 maart 2019

Laatst geverifieerd

1 maart 2019

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • HR # 20270

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren