Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Pharmacy Home Adherence Reporting and Monitoring Outcomes Study (PHARxMOS)

13 december 2021 bijgewerkt door: Brown University

Nudging Doctors to Collaborate With Pharmacists to Improve Medication Adherence

This study is a pilot test of an intervention that delivers timely diagnostic information about medication nonadherence to doctors, and then offers the services of clinical pharmacists to treat these nonadherence problems. Participating doctors will be notified when a patient is 10 days late refilling a medication for diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. In one randomization arm the pharmacist will contact the patient as the default option (with no action required by the doctor), and in the other the pharmacist will contact the patient only if the doctor actively chooses that the pharmacist take action. Patients of participating doctors will be randomized to 1) one of these two pharmacist options, 2) an information only control arm in which the doctor gets adherence information but does not have access to a pharmacist for that patient, and 3) a no information control arm. The investigators' central hypothesis is that the pharmacist will be consulted more often when intervention by the pharmacist is the default outcome and that the default pharmacist intervention will be the most beneficial for adherence outcomes.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Poor adherence with prescription medications is ubiquitous, regardless of the disease, medication, patient population, or country studied. It is also expensive - annual costs of poor adherence in the United States were recently estimated at $290 billion. This problem has two components: diagnosis and treatment. Regarding diagnosis, doctors' assessments of patients' adherence are inaccurate, and doctors often do not discuss adherence problems with their patients. This makes it attractive to use pharmacy claims to identify nonadherence. While diagnostic data is necessary to solve the non-adherence problem, it is not sufficient. Once diagnosed, doctors must take action to treat nonadherence. Research shows that simply giving doctors claims data about nonadherence is ineffective, probably because it is not clear what action to take, and because the costs in time and energy of taking action are too great. What is currently lacking is a practical way to effectively integrate this diagnostic information and treatment expertise into work flows in primary care doctors' offices, and an effective method of inducing doctors to act on it. Behavioral economics suggests that barriers to doctors' action may be overcome in a cost effective way by altering the architecture of choices doctors face.

The long term goal of this research is to develop systems that effectively connect pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), primary care doctors, clinical pharmacists, and patients in ways that improve medication adherence and patients' health outcomes. The overall objective of this application, which is the next step toward attainment of the investigators long term goal, is to conduct a pilot test of an intervention that delivers timely diagnostic information about nonadherence to doctors, and then offers the services of clinical pharmacists to treat these nonadherence problems. Participating doctors will be notified when a patient is 10 days late refilling a medication for diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. Taking advantage of the principle of intelligent choice architecture from behavioral economics, in one arm the pharmacist will contact the patient as the default option (with no action required by the doctor), and in the other the pharmacist will contact the patient only if the doctor actively chooses that the pharmacist take action. Patients of participating doctors will be randomized to 1) one of these two pharmacist options, 2) an information only control arm in which the doctor gets adherence information but does not have access to a pharmacist for that patient, and 3) a no information control arm. The investigators central hypothesis, which is strongly supported by work in other fields, is that the pharmacist will be consulted more often when intervention by the pharmacist is the default outcome and that the default pharmacist intervention will be the most beneficial for adherence outcomes.

This study is a collaboration between researchers at Brown University, Tufts University, Harvard University, and Johns Hopkins University; Express Scripts; a large regional commercial insurer; and a network of primary care doctors in Eastern Massachusetts. The team is led by Dr. Ira Wilson, an experienced adherence researcher, and includes behavioral and health economists, and a statistician experienced in adherence issues. The investigators will accomplish the investigators overall objectives by pursuing the following Specific Aims:

  1. Establish and test the technical and communications infrastructure required for the conduct of this clinical trial. The following steps must occur in a secure environment: a) Express Scripts notifies the study that a patient is late filling a prescription, b) the study notifies the doctor, c) the doctor makes a choice about how to respond, and d) a pharmacist, in some cases, contacts the patient.
  2. Conduct and evaluate a clinical trial of an intervention comparing methods of offering pharmacist services to primary care doctors. Eligible doctors and patients will be randomized to a) pharmacist services under one of two choice architecture conditions (default or choice), b) adherence information only, or c) no information; further randomization for patients in the experimental arms will occur where the patient's HMO/PPO status will be revealed to the physician, or not. Outcomes include medication adherence, duration of nonadherence event, and physician participant behavioral outcomes.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

2697

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, Verenigde Staten, 02913
        • Brown University

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Physician Inclusion Criteria:

  • New England Quality Care Alliance (NEQCA) primary care physicians of adult patients insured through large commercial insurer partner

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients of consented New England Quality Care Alliance (NEQCA) primary care physicians
  • Insured through large commercial insurer partner
  • Prescribed chronic medications for one or more of the three study conditions in the past six months

Patient Exclusion Criterion:

  • On the insurer's "do not contact" list

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Default patient default doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient unless physician cancels call
Experimenteel: Information patient default doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician
Geen tussenkomst: Control patient default doctor
Control - no intervention
Experimenteel: Choice patient choice doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient if physician requests call
Experimenteel: Information patient choice doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician
Geen tussenkomst: Control patient choice doctor
Control - no intervention
Experimenteel: Information patient information doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician
Geen tussenkomst: Control patient information doctor
Control - no intervention
Experimenteel: Information doctor
Physician receives nonadherence information, but there is no opportunity for pharmacist action
Experimenteel: Choice doctor
Physician receives nonadherence information, and can choose to request pharmacist action
Experimenteel: Default doctor
Physician receives nonadherence information; pharmacist action will be triggered unless physician cancels action

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Probability of Resolution of Nonadherence Within 30 Days
Tijdsspanne: Outcome measure examines fills within 30 days of a nonadherence event. Participants were followed over a total of 6 months.
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which these patients have filled a prescription by 30 days. Outcome is 1 if the patient fills the prescription by 30 days (considered resolution of nonadherence); otherwise it is 0. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of nonadherence (NAE) events resolved within 30 days across all patients in each particular arm.
Outcome measure examines fills within 30 days of a nonadherence event. Participants were followed over a total of 6 months.
Duration of Nonadherence Event
Tijdsspanne: Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the duration of nonadherence event (the length of time the patient took to refill a prescription if the refill had been late), in days.
Participants were followed over a total of 6 months

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Probability of Physician Viewing Nonadherence Event Information
Tijdsspanne: Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which physicians viewed nonadherence event information. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of NAE event notices viewed by the physician across all patients in each particular arm.
Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Probability of Pharmacist Action Triggered
Tijdsspanne: Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which pharmacist action was triggered to resolve nonadherence. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of NAE events which triggered pharmacist action across all patients in each particular arm.
Participants were followed over a total of 6 months

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Ira B Wilson, MD, MSc, Brown University

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 maart 2011

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 februari 2014

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 februari 2014

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

2 november 2014

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

30 november 2014

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

3 december 2014

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

11 januari 2022

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

13 december 2021

Laatst geverifieerd

1 december 2021

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • 1010000295
  • 7RC4AG039072-02 (Subsidie/contract van de Amerikaanse NIH)

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren