Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Pharmacy Home Adherence Reporting and Monitoring Outcomes Study (PHARxMOS)

13 grudnia 2021 zaktualizowane przez: Brown University

Nudging Doctors to Collaborate With Pharmacists to Improve Medication Adherence

This study is a pilot test of an intervention that delivers timely diagnostic information about medication nonadherence to doctors, and then offers the services of clinical pharmacists to treat these nonadherence problems. Participating doctors will be notified when a patient is 10 days late refilling a medication for diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. In one randomization arm the pharmacist will contact the patient as the default option (with no action required by the doctor), and in the other the pharmacist will contact the patient only if the doctor actively chooses that the pharmacist take action. Patients of participating doctors will be randomized to 1) one of these two pharmacist options, 2) an information only control arm in which the doctor gets adherence information but does not have access to a pharmacist for that patient, and 3) a no information control arm. The investigators' central hypothesis is that the pharmacist will be consulted more often when intervention by the pharmacist is the default outcome and that the default pharmacist intervention will be the most beneficial for adherence outcomes.

Przegląd badań

Szczegółowy opis

Poor adherence with prescription medications is ubiquitous, regardless of the disease, medication, patient population, or country studied. It is also expensive - annual costs of poor adherence in the United States were recently estimated at $290 billion. This problem has two components: diagnosis and treatment. Regarding diagnosis, doctors' assessments of patients' adherence are inaccurate, and doctors often do not discuss adherence problems with their patients. This makes it attractive to use pharmacy claims to identify nonadherence. While diagnostic data is necessary to solve the non-adherence problem, it is not sufficient. Once diagnosed, doctors must take action to treat nonadherence. Research shows that simply giving doctors claims data about nonadherence is ineffective, probably because it is not clear what action to take, and because the costs in time and energy of taking action are too great. What is currently lacking is a practical way to effectively integrate this diagnostic information and treatment expertise into work flows in primary care doctors' offices, and an effective method of inducing doctors to act on it. Behavioral economics suggests that barriers to doctors' action may be overcome in a cost effective way by altering the architecture of choices doctors face.

The long term goal of this research is to develop systems that effectively connect pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs), primary care doctors, clinical pharmacists, and patients in ways that improve medication adherence and patients' health outcomes. The overall objective of this application, which is the next step toward attainment of the investigators long term goal, is to conduct a pilot test of an intervention that delivers timely diagnostic information about nonadherence to doctors, and then offers the services of clinical pharmacists to treat these nonadherence problems. Participating doctors will be notified when a patient is 10 days late refilling a medication for diabetes, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. Taking advantage of the principle of intelligent choice architecture from behavioral economics, in one arm the pharmacist will contact the patient as the default option (with no action required by the doctor), and in the other the pharmacist will contact the patient only if the doctor actively chooses that the pharmacist take action. Patients of participating doctors will be randomized to 1) one of these two pharmacist options, 2) an information only control arm in which the doctor gets adherence information but does not have access to a pharmacist for that patient, and 3) a no information control arm. The investigators central hypothesis, which is strongly supported by work in other fields, is that the pharmacist will be consulted more often when intervention by the pharmacist is the default outcome and that the default pharmacist intervention will be the most beneficial for adherence outcomes.

This study is a collaboration between researchers at Brown University, Tufts University, Harvard University, and Johns Hopkins University; Express Scripts; a large regional commercial insurer; and a network of primary care doctors in Eastern Massachusetts. The team is led by Dr. Ira Wilson, an experienced adherence researcher, and includes behavioral and health economists, and a statistician experienced in adherence issues. The investigators will accomplish the investigators overall objectives by pursuing the following Specific Aims:

  1. Establish and test the technical and communications infrastructure required for the conduct of this clinical trial. The following steps must occur in a secure environment: a) Express Scripts notifies the study that a patient is late filling a prescription, b) the study notifies the doctor, c) the doctor makes a choice about how to respond, and d) a pharmacist, in some cases, contacts the patient.
  2. Conduct and evaluate a clinical trial of an intervention comparing methods of offering pharmacist services to primary care doctors. Eligible doctors and patients will be randomized to a) pharmacist services under one of two choice architecture conditions (default or choice), b) adherence information only, or c) no information; further randomization for patients in the experimental arms will occur where the patient's HMO/PPO status will be revealed to the physician, or not. Outcomes include medication adherence, duration of nonadherence event, and physician participant behavioral outcomes.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)

2697

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Lokalizacje studiów

    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, Stany Zjednoczone, 02913
        • Brown University

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

18 lat i starsze (Dorosły, Starszy dorosły)

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki

Wszystko

Opis

Physician Inclusion Criteria:

  • New England Quality Care Alliance (NEQCA) primary care physicians of adult patients insured through large commercial insurer partner

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients of consented New England Quality Care Alliance (NEQCA) primary care physicians
  • Insured through large commercial insurer partner
  • Prescribed chronic medications for one or more of the three study conditions in the past six months

Patient Exclusion Criterion:

  • On the insurer's "do not contact" list

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Badania usług zdrowotnych
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Pojedynczy

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Eksperymentalny: Default patient default doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient unless physician cancels call
Eksperymentalny: Information patient default doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician
Brak interwencji: Control patient default doctor
Control - no intervention
Eksperymentalny: Choice patient choice doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician; Pharmacist calls patient if physician requests call
Eksperymentalny: Information patient choice doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician
Brak interwencji: Control patient choice doctor
Control - no intervention
Eksperymentalny: Information patient information doctor
Patient nonadherence information sent to physician
Brak interwencji: Control patient information doctor
Control - no intervention
Eksperymentalny: Information doctor
Physician receives nonadherence information, but there is no opportunity for pharmacist action
Eksperymentalny: Choice doctor
Physician receives nonadherence information, and can choose to request pharmacist action
Eksperymentalny: Default doctor
Physician receives nonadherence information; pharmacist action will be triggered unless physician cancels action

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Probability of Resolution of Nonadherence Within 30 Days
Ramy czasowe: Outcome measure examines fills within 30 days of a nonadherence event. Participants were followed over a total of 6 months.
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which these patients have filled a prescription by 30 days. Outcome is 1 if the patient fills the prescription by 30 days (considered resolution of nonadherence); otherwise it is 0. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of nonadherence (NAE) events resolved within 30 days across all patients in each particular arm.
Outcome measure examines fills within 30 days of a nonadherence event. Participants were followed over a total of 6 months.
Duration of Nonadherence Event
Ramy czasowe: Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the duration of nonadherence event (the length of time the patient took to refill a prescription if the refill had been late), in days.
Participants were followed over a total of 6 months

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Probability of Physician Viewing Nonadherence Event Information
Ramy czasowe: Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which physicians viewed nonadherence event information. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of NAE event notices viewed by the physician across all patients in each particular arm.
Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Probability of Pharmacist Action Triggered
Ramy czasowe: Participants were followed over a total of 6 months
Patients who were more than 10 days late refilling a chronic medication prescription were in the analytic sample frame and were targeted for intervention according to how they were randomized. This outcome is the rate at which pharmacist action was triggered to resolve nonadherence. Outcome measures reported are the means of the per-person proportions of NAE events which triggered pharmacist action across all patients in each particular arm.
Participants were followed over a total of 6 months

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Ira B Wilson, MD, MSc, Brown University

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów

1 marca 2011

Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)

1 lutego 2014

Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

1 lutego 2014

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

2 listopada 2014

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

30 listopada 2014

Pierwszy wysłany (Oszacować)

3 grudnia 2014

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

11 stycznia 2022

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

13 grudnia 2021

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 grudnia 2021

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • 1010000295
  • 7RC4AG039072-02 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIE

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj