Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Training Based On Declarative Memory Cues Improved Gait In Patients With Parkinson's Disease

6 november 2015 bijgewerkt door: University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Improvement In Gait Performance After Training Based On Declarative Memory Cues In Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Deficits in automatic motor control, characteristic of Parkinson's disease (PD), contribute to progressive impairment in gait performance. The use of declarative memory cues in order to promote the engagement of attention and activation of the next movement in gait may minimize the consequences of lack of automatic control. The purpose of this study is to verify the long-term efficiency of a new strategy based on declarative memory cue to improve the gait performance and independence in daily life activities (DLA) in patients with PD.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Background: Deficits in automatic motor control, characteristic of Parkinson's disease (PD), contribute to progressive impairment in gait performance. The use of declarative memory cues in order to promote the engagement of attention and activation of the next movement in gait may minimize the consequences of lack of automatic control.

Objectives: To verify the long-term efficiency of a new strategy based on declarative memory cue to improve the gait performance and independence in daily life activities (DLA) in patients with PD.

Design: Parallel prospective, single blind, randomized clinical trial. Setting: Brazilian Parkinson Association. Participants: Forty-four patients with PD in stages 2-3 of disease evolution according to Hoehn and Yahr Classification Interventions: The experimental training (ET) consisted of eight gait training sessions, twice a week, using the declarative memory cues strategy (DMCS). The control training (CT) consisted of a similar gait training without DMCS.

Primary outcome measure: Gait performance in terms of speed and stride length. Secondary outcome measure: Independence in DLA according to Section II of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.

Randomization: Participants were randomized into a control group (CG), which performed the CT, and an experimental group (EG), which performed the ET, through blinded drawing of names.

Statistical analysis: The gait performance and ADL independence before, 2 and 60 days after the end of training were compared for CG and EG using Repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA).

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

50

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

  • Brazilië
      • São Paulo, Brazilië, 05360-160
        • Department of Physiotherapy, Communication Science & Disorders, Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

65 jaar tot 80 jaar (Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease according to the UK Brain Bank criteria;
  • in stage 2-3 of the disease evolution according to the Hoehn and Yahr;
  • treated with levodopa or its synergists;
  • capable to ambulate independently indoors without aid;
  • referring 5 to 15 years of education;
  • good visual and auditory acuity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of other neurological (excluding PD), orthopedic or cardiopulmonary problems;
  • visual and auditory deficiency;
  • dementia [assessed by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), cut-off 23];
  • depression [according to the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), cut-off 6]
  • participation in other physical therapy training.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: experimental group (EG)
The experimental training (ET) consisted of eight gait training sessions, twice a week, using the declarative memory cues strategy (DMCS).
Gedragsmatig: Experimental Training

The ET consisted of 3 phases being that the first one (Phase 1) was done only in the first session.

Phase 1: patients received a short and simple explanation about the deficiency in automatic movement resulting from PD. Following explanation, the patient memorized a sequence of declarative cues. Phase 2: the patient organized a sequence of cues using cards illustrating the subcomponent movements (key movement) involved in taking steps.

Phase 3: the patient had to train using declarative cues as a gait performance aid through 8 sets follow the instruction "Walk in your ordinary speed. Use the key movements and going to saying each of them while you make them. The declarative cues had to be evoked verbally by the patients themselves, during gait, triggering the corresponding movement.

Andere namen:
  • Declarative memory cues strategy (DMCS)
Actieve vergelijker: control group (CG)
The control training (CT) consisted of a similar gait training without DMCS.
Gedragsmatig: Control Training

The CT consisted of 3 phases, being the first one (Phase 1) was done only in the first session of training, and the other two (Phase 2 and 3) were repeated at each of the 8 sessions.

Phase 1: Patients received a short and simple explanation about the deficiency in automatic movement resulting from PD.

Phase 2: Patients received a general verbal attentional instruction of "pay attention to your steps and try to walk as better as you can", before starting the walk.

Phase 3: motor training of gait, where the patient had to perform 8 sets, following the instruction "Walk in your ordinary speed, paying attention to your steps" in the identical trajectories of ET. Additional instructions or cues were not provided.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
gait speed
Tijdsspanne: up to 3 months
The first primary outcome was the gait speed (m/s). Patients were asked to walk in a straight trajectory of 20 meter following the sole instruction "upon the go signal, walk as fast as possible at the line and stop". The speed was calculated based on the time to walk 20 meters timed using a digital chronometer.
up to 3 months
stride length on gait
Tijdsspanne: up to 3 months
The second primary outcome was the stride length (cm) on gait. Patients were asked to walk in a straight trajectory of 20 meter following the sole instruction "upon the go signal, walk as fast as possible at the line and stop". The number of steps was measured using a pedometer.
up to 3 months

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Independence in activities of daily living (ADL)
Tijdsspanne: up to 3 months
The secondary outcome was independence in activities of daily living (ADL), assessed by Section II of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-II). This section includes 12 questions (items 5 to 16) on patient's performance in ADL. Among these questions, two investigate gait performance (frequent fall due to freezing; inability to walk ), with scores ranging from zero (normal) to 4.
up to 3 months

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Maria Elisa P Piemonte, PhD, Department of Physiotherapy, Communication Science & Disorders, Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 maart 2014

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 augustus 2015

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 oktober 2015

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

4 november 2015

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

6 november 2015

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

9 november 2015

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)

9 november 2015

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

6 november 2015

Laatst geverifieerd

1 november 2015

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • USPNEC006

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren