Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Multicentric Study for External Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Mammographic Breast Density Categorization

19 augustus 2021 bijgewerkt door: Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
The correct categorization of breast density is essential to adapt the diagnostic examination to the needs of each patient. Assessment of breast density is performed visually by radiologists. Some authors have detected that this method involves considerable intra and interobserver variability. On the other hand, automated systems for measuring breast density are becoming more and more frequent. Machine learning is a domain of Artificial Intelligence, which comprises the process of developing systems with the ability to learn and make predictions using data. These systems are designed to aid healthcare professional decision making. In the present work, the multicenter study of external validation of a tool based on deep learning for the categorization of mammographic breast density is proposed.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Nog niet aan het werven

Conditie

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

The correct categorization of breast density is essential to adapt the diagnostic examination to the needs of each patient. Assessment of breast density is performed visually by radiologists. Some authors have detected that this method involves considerable intra and interobserver variability. On the other hand, automated systems for measuring breast density are becoming more and more frequent. Consequently, in clinical practice, breast density is reported from the assessment carried out by specialists with the support of these systems. But there are few studies about the use, concordance and perception of usefulness of professionals on these tools. A study carried out at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires reported a moderate to almost perfect inter- and intra-observer agreement among radiologists and a moderate concordance between the categorization carried out by experts and that carried out by commercial software of a digital mammography machine. Machine learning is a domain of Artificial Intelligence, which comprises the process of developing systems with the ability to learn and make predictions using data. Once a system designed to aid healthcare professional decision making is developed, it must be validated. In 2019, an internal validation of a tool based on deep learning techniques was carried out for the automatic categorization of mammographic breast density. The tool reached a very good interobserver agreement, kappa = 0.64 (95% CI 0.58-0.69), when compared with the performance of the professionals. It reached a sensitivity of 83.2 (CI: 76.9-88.3) and a specificity of 88.4 (83.9-92.0.) In the present work, the multicenter study of external validation of a tool based on deep learning for the categorization of mammographic breast density is proposed. The evaluation of this tool will be carried out in two external institutions: Hospital Alemán and Fundación Científica del Sur.

Studietype

Observationeel

Inschrijving (Verwacht)

277

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Kind
  • Volwassen
  • Oudere volwassene

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Ja

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Bemonsteringsmethode

Niet-waarschijnlijkheidssteekproef

Studie Bevolking

The unit of analysis will be the bilateral mammographic images with mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views. The images selected for this study will be screening mammograms performed at Saint John's Cancer Institute. The institution will select the images according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The images will be extracted from the institutional database retrospectively and will be anonymized without any personal data, except for the age of the patient. These images will be stored in DICOM format, in a safe place with restricted access limited only to the investigation team.

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mammograms included in the study should meet the following criteria:

    • Female patients of 40 years of age or more.
    • To have at least one screening mammography exam performed at Saint John's
    • Cancer Institute during the study period. These exams will be included regardless of the brand of the mammography equipment.
    • Mammograms should be performed with digital equipment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mammograms with the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

    • Patients with gigantomastia, defined by the need for more than one image of each mammographic view (mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal) to evaluate the entire breast volume.
    • Patients with breast implants.
    • Patients with a history of breast surgery.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Agreement between the majority report and Artemisia´s categorization of dense breasts/non-dense breasts
Tijdsspanne: 2 months
The agreement between the CNN and the total of the professionals' categorizations will be calculated with the linear weighted kappa. To this end, the categories assigned by the professionals will be considered as only one observer in each one of the studies and they will be compared to those assigned by Artemisia for the same set of images.
2 months
Agreement between the majority report and Artemisia in each one of the four breast density categories
Tijdsspanne: 2 months
For each one of the professionals involved in the study, the agreement with the CNN will be calculated with the linear weighted kappa coefficient. To this end, the categories assigned by the professionals will be considered as only one observer in each one of the studies and they will be compared to those assigned by Artemisia for the same set of images.
2 months

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Agreement between each observer and Artemisia´s categorization of dense breasts/non-dense breasts
Tijdsspanne: 2 months
To this end, the categories assigned by the professionals will be considered as only one observer in each one of the studies and they will be compared to those assigned by Artemisia for the same set of images.
2 months
Agreement between each observer and Artemisia in each one of the four breast density categories
Tijdsspanne: 2 months
For each one of the professionals involved in the study, the agreement with the CNN will be calculated with the linear weighted kappa coefficient. To this end, the categories assigned by the professionals will be considered as only one observer in each one of the studies and they will be compared to those assigned by Artemisia for the same set of images.
2 months
Agreement between each observer and the majority report in the categorization of dense breasts/non-dense breasts
Tijdsspanne: 2 months
For each one of the professionals involved in the study, the agreement with the majority report will be calculated with the linear weighted kappa coefficient. To this end, the categories assigned by the professionals will be considered as only one observer in each one of the studies and they will be compared to those assigned by the majority report for the same set of images.
2 months
Agreement between each observer and the majority report in each one of the four breast density categories
Tijdsspanne: 2 months
For each one of the professionals involved in the study, the agreement with the majority report will be calculated with the linear weighted kappa coefficient. To this end, the categories assigned by the professionals will be considered as only one observer in each one of the studies and they will be compared to those assigned by the majority report for the same set of images.
2 months

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Daniel R Luna, MD, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Algemene publicaties

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Verwacht)

1 september 2021

Primaire voltooiing (Verwacht)

1 april 2022

Studie voltooiing (Verwacht)

1 juli 2022

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

19 augustus 2021

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

19 augustus 2021

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

25 augustus 2021

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

25 augustus 2021

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

19 augustus 2021

Laatst geverifieerd

1 juli 2021

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • 6077
  • 4927 (PRIISA)

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren