Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Strain Counterstrain Versus Graston Technique for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (SCS-GRAS-PFPS)

10 mei 2026 bijgewerkt door: Saman Bukish Cheema, Green International University

Immediate Effects of Strain CountetStrain Versus Graston Technique on Pain and Range of Motion in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trail.

This clinical trial compares the effects of Strain Counterstrain technique versus Graston Technique on pain and range of motion in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Adults with patellofemoral pain syndrome were included in this study. A total of 60 participants were divided into two groups with 30 patients in each group.

One group received Strain Counterstrain technique and the other group received Graston Technique. Pain was assessed using the Kujala Scoring System and functional status was measured using a substructural questionnaire. Range of motion was also evaluated before and after treatment.

The main goal of this study is to determine which technique is more effective in reducing pain and improving knee function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by anterior knee pain, especially during activities like squatting, climbing stairs, or prolonged sitting. Conservative management through manual therapy is widely used, but comparative effectiveness of different techniques remains unclear.

This randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the effects of Strain Counterstrain (SCS) technique versus Graston Technique on pain intensity, knee range of motion, and functional status in patients diagnosed with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

A total of 60 participants diagnosed with PFPS were recruited and randomly allocated into two equal groups, with 30 patients in each group. Group A received Strain Counterstrain technique, which involves passive positioning of the affected tissue to achieve a position of comfort and reduce tender point sensitivity. Group B received Graston Technique, an instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) therapy that uses specialized stainless steel instruments to detect and treat soft tissue restrictions, scar tissue, and fascial adhesions around the knee.

The intervention period lasted for 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Pain was evaluated using the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale, also known as the Kujala Scoring System, which is a validated tool for PFPS. Functional status was assessed using a substructural questionnaire evaluating daily activities. Knee range of motion was measured using a standard goniometer.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Strain Counterstrain or Graston Technique provides superior outcomes in terms of pain reduction, improved range of motion, and enhanced functional capacity in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. The findings will help clinicians select the most effective manual therapy approach for managing PFPS.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

60

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

  • Pakistan
    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000
        • Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Department of Physical Therapy

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Volwassen

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-45 years.
  • Anterior or peripatellar knee discomfort reproduced by a minimum of two aggravating exercises (e.g., squatting, stairs, running, prolonged sitting).
  • No history of trauma.
  • On the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), pain severity is ≥3/10 at baseline.
  • Symptom duration ≥2 months.
  • Ability to understand instructions and provide informed consent (or parental consent for minors).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who have had lower limb surgery within the previous 12 months
  • Existence of other knee pathologies (e.g., meniscal tear with locking, tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis).
  • Skin infection, open wound, or dermatological condition at the treatment site.
  • Use of anticoagulants/bleeding disorders or recent corticosteroid injection within 3 months.
  • Receipt of manual therapy (SCS, IASTM/Graston) to the affected knee within the past 4 weeks.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Verdrievoudigen

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Strain Counterstrain Group
Participants in this arm received Strain Counterstrain technique for patellofemoral pain syndrome. This technique involves identifying tender points and passively positioning the affected tissue to a position of comfort to reduce pain and muscle spasm. Treatment sessions were administered 3 times per week for 12 weeks. 30 participants were assigned to this group.
Procedure: Strain Counterstrain
Strain Counterstrain is a manual therapy technique that involves identifying tender points in muscles and fascia. The therapist passively positions the patient's body to a position of comfort that reduces or eliminates the tenderness. This position is held for 90 seconds to allow neuromuscular reset, followed by slow return to neutral. The technique aims to reduce muscle spasm, normalize proprioceptive activity, and decrease pain in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Sessions were administered 3 times per week for 12 weeks.
Andere namen:
  • SCS
  • Positional Release Therapy
Experimenteel: Graston Technique Group
Participants in this arm received Graston Technique, an instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) therapy. This technique uses specialized stainless steel instruments to detect and treat soft tissue restrictions, scar tissue, and fascial adhesions around the knee. Treatment sessions were administered 3 times per week for 12 weeks. 30 participants were assigned to this group.
Procedure: Graston Technique
Graston Technique is an evidence-based form of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM). It uses six specialized stainless steel instruments to scan, detect, and treat soft tissue lesions, scar tissue, and fascial restrictions. The instruments are used by trained clinicians to apply controlled microtrauma to affected areas around the knee, promoting tissue healing and remodeling. The goal is to break down adhesions, reduce pain, and improve range of motion and function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Sessions were administered 3 times per week for 12 weeks.
Andere namen:
  • IASTM
  • Instrumentondersteunde mobilisatie van zacht weefsel

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Change in Pain and Function using Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale
Tijdsspanne: Baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention
The Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale, also known as Kujala Scoring System, was used to assess pain and functional limitations related to patellofemoral pain syndrome. This is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire evaluating symptoms such as pain during walking, stair climbing, squatting, running, and prolonged sitting. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, where 0 represents complete disability and 100 represents no disability. A higher score indicates less pain and better knee function. Change from baseline was calculated to determine treatment effectiveness.
Baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Change in Knee Range of Motion
Tijdsspanne: Baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention
Knee flexion and extension range of motion was measured using a standard universal goniometer. Active range of motion was recorded in degrees. Increased range of motion indicates improvement in knee function.
Baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention
Change in Functional Status
Tijdsspanne: Baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention
Functional status was assessed using a substructural questionnaire evaluating the impact of patellofemoral pain syndrome on daily activities such as walking, stair climbing, squatting, and prolonged sitting. Higher scores indicate better functional capacity.
Baseline and 12 weeks post-intervention

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

Green International University

Medewerkers

Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

2 november 2025

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

29 april 2026

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

5 mei 2026

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

10 mei 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

10 mei 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

15 mei 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

15 mei 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

10 mei 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 mei 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • GIU/REC/26-28

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

JA

Beschrijving IPD-plan

Only IPD used in the results publication will be shared.

IPD-tijdsbestek voor delen

It will be available after the completion of the study.

IPD-toegangscriteria voor delen

Data requests should be sent to the corresponding author. Access will be granted to qualified researchers for approved research proposals. Data will be de-identified before sharing.

IPD delen Ondersteunend informatietype

  • LEERPROTOCOOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • MVO

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren