Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Integrated PBL-CBL-CTTM Teaching to Enhance Clinical Self-Efficacy in Endocrine Critical Illness Among Internal Medicine Residents: An RCT (PBL-CBL-CTTM)

28 augustus 2026 bijgewerkt door: Jianyong Zhao, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University

Online-Offline Integrated Multimodal Teaching Combining PBL, CBL, and CTTM to Enhance Clinical Self-Efficacy in Endocrine and Metabolic Critical Illness Among Internal Medicine Residents: A Convergent Parallel Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial evaluates whether an integrated online-offline multimodal teaching approach combining Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Case-Based Learning (CBL), and Case Three-Dimensional Teaching Method (CTTM) improves clinical self-efficacy and hands-on proficiency in managing endocrine and metabolic critical illness among internal medicine residents, compared to traditional lecture-based learning (LBL).

Ninety internal medicine residents on their first endocrine rotation will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to three groups: (1) Control group receiving traditional LBL alone; (2) Experimental group 1 receiving PBL plus LBL; (3) Experimental group 2 receiving the integrated PBL-CBL-CTTM closed-loop teaching program. All groups receive a standardized 12-hour curriculum on endocrine and metabolic critical illness, including diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome, thyroid storm, and refractory hypoglycemia.

The primary outcome is the clinical skills assessment score (0-50 points). Secondary outcomes include theoretical examination scores, General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) scores, a self-developed Endocrine High-Risk Management Self-Efficacy Source Questionnaire (four dimensions based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory), teaching satisfaction, and semi-structured focus group interviews.

The study was conducted from September 2025 to August 2026 at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, China. This study aims to establish an evidence-based, replicable teaching model that addresses the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical confidence in managing endocrine emergencies among residents.

Studie Overzicht

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

90

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Anhui
      • Chaohu, Anhui, China, 238000
        • The fourth affiliated hospital of Anhui medical university

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Volwassen

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Ja

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Full-time internal medicine residents undergoing their first endocrine rotation at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
  • No prior endocrine remedial training or advanced study experience
  • No independent management experience with endocrine and metabolic critical cases
  • Ability to complete all 12 hours of standardized curriculum and all post-intervention assessments
  • Voluntary participation with written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior completion of an endocrine rotation or specialized endocrine training
  • Prior independent management experience in diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome, thyroid storm, or refractory hypoglycemia
  • Inability to complete the full 12-hour teaching schedule due to clinical duties, leave, or rotation transfer
  • Concurrent participation in other teaching intervention research projects
  • Decline to provide written informed consent or withdrawal before randomization

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Ander
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Actieve vergelijker: Control Group (LBL Alone)
Received only in-person one-way didactic lectures (lecture-based learning, LBL) with self-directed review after class. No online discussions, ward-based training, CTTM resources, or post-class debriefing. Total 12-hour standardized curriculum on endocrine and metabolic critical illness. n=30.
In-person one-way didactic lectures with self-directed review after class. Total 12-hour standardized curriculum on endocrine and metabolic critical illness, including diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome, thyroid storm, and refractory hypoglycemia.
Experimenteel: Experimental Group 1 (PBL+LBL)
Received pre-class online problem-based learning (PBL) via DingTalk (open-ended critical case questions, independent literature search, online group discussion) plus standardized in-person lectures (LBL), with self-directed review after class. No ward-based CTTM training or post-class debriefing. Total 12-hour standardized curriculum. n=30.
Pre-class online problem-based learning (PBL) via DingTalk (open-ended critical case questions, independent literature search, online group discussion) plus standardized in-person lectures (LBL), with self-directed review after class. Total 12-hour standardized curriculum.
Experimenteel: Experimental Group 2 (Integrated PBL-CBL-CTTM)
Received integrated closed-loop teaching: pre-class PBL (identical to experimental group 1) plus standardized in-person lectures plus post-class ward-based case-based learning (CBL) with attending-supervised hands-on critical case training, case three-dimensional teaching method (CTTM) resources, and post-class debriefing. Total 12-hour standardized curriculum. n=30.
Integrated closed-loop teaching: pre-class online PBL (identical to experimental group 1) plus standardized in-person lectures plus post-class ward-based case-based learning (CBL) with attending-supervised hands-on critical case training, case three-dimensional teaching method (CTTM) resources, and post-class debriefing. Total 12-hour standardized curriculum.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Clinical skills assessment score
Tijdsspanne: Immediately post-intervention (upon completion of the 12-hour curriculum)
Assessed by group-blinded evaluators using a standardized clinical skills checklist immediately after the 12-hour intervention. Total score range: 0-50 points. Higher scores indicate better clinical proficiency in managing endocrine and metabolic critical illness.
Immediately post-intervention (upon completion of the 12-hour curriculum)

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Theoretical examination score
Tijdsspanne: Immediately post-intervention
Closed-book written examination graded by blinded faculty. Total score range: 0-50 points, covering endocrine and metabolic critical illness knowledge.
Immediately post-intervention
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) score
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention
10-item standardized self-efficacy scale (Cronbach's α=0.89), completed anonymously. Higher scores indicate greater general self-efficacy.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention
Endocrine High-Risk Management Self-Efficacy Source Questionnaire score
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention
Self-developed 4-dimension questionnaire based on Bandura's self-efficacy theory (mastery experience, vicarious learning, verbal persuasion, positive affect; Cronbach's α=0.81, CVI=0.92), completed anonymously.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately post-intervention
Teaching satisfaction scale score
Tijdsspanne: Immediately post-intervention
5-dimension teaching satisfaction scale (recognition rate and mean score), completed anonymously.
Immediately post-intervention
Focus group interview themes
Tijdsspanne: Within 1 week post-intervention
Semi-structured focus group interviews (30-40 minutes each) with 24 residents selected via stratified purposive sampling, analyzed using Braun & Clarke six-step thematic analysis method. Explores residents' experiences and psychological mechanisms underlying changes in clinical self-efficacy.
Within 1 week post-intervention

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

1 september 2025

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

28 augustus 2026

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

28 augustus 2026

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

28 augustus 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

28 augustus 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

3 september 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

3 september 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

28 augustus 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 augustus 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • KYXM-202508-021 (Andere identificatie: Ethics Approval Number)
  • AHWJ2025BAp20022 (Ander subsidie-/financieringsnummer: Anhui Provincial Health Commission)

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Beschrijving IPD-plan

This is a medical education randomized controlled trial. All data were collected through anonymous questionnaires and blinded assessments, and all participant identifiers were removed at the time of data collection. No individual participant-level clinical data exist that could be shared. Aggregated study data are presented in the published manuscript.

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren