Improving Palliative Care Access Through Technology (ImPAcTT)
7. juli 2021 oppdatert av: Caroline Stephens, University of Utah
Improving Palliative Care Access Through Technology (ImPAcTT): A Multi- Component Pilot Study
This project will focus on developing, optimizing and pilot-testing a multi-component Improving Access Through Technology (ImPAcTT) intervention that leverages existing telehealth technologies to provide staff education; family outreach, engagement and support; care coordination; and resident symptom management and facilitation of goals-of-care discussion.
Studieoversikt
Status
Suspendert
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
Almost 1.8 million older Americans live in nursing homes (NH), with estimates that this number will grow to more than 3 million by 2050. NHs are increasingly becoming the place of care and site of death for frail older adults dying from multiple chronic illnesses. Unfortunately, most residents die without the benefit of palliative care (PC) or with palliation delayed until the last days of life.
Unfortunately, hospice services are often the only formal end of life care service available in NHs, and access to hospice enrollment is complicated by financial implications for both NHs and residents.
Telehealth, or remote monitoring of patients through information and communication technologies, is an effective mechanism for addressing the increased demand on health services and has much to offer to people living with and dying from advanced illness. Moreover, numerous studies have demonstrated positive benefits of using telehealth in the NH to improve access to consultants (e.g., neurology, dermatology, psychiatry).
Little is known, however, about the effect of using Telehealth on improving access to PC specialists in the NH setting.
The proposed ImPAcTT intervention employs a secure communications platform that permits multi-person live video, audio, and text message consultations; real-time document sharing and documentation for advanced care planning discussions; and remote virtual assessment capabilities.
The investigator will conduct a pilot implementation trial of ImPAcTT in 3 study nursing homes to evaluate our ability to safely recruit and retain study participants, collect appropriate and accurate data, and determine preliminary estimates of an effect size of the intervention.
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Forventet)
81
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, Forente stater, 94143
- University of California San Francisco - UCSF
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, Forente stater, 84112
- University of Utah
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier
Alle
Beskrivelse
Purposeful sampling will take place in an attempt to collect data from a range of ethnically and racially diverse participants.
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Primary participant
- Age >= 18 years
- English language fluency
- Palliative Care Consult Screening Tool (PCCS) scoring 9 or above
- If participant does not demonstrate capacity to consent, he/she must be able to assent to study procedures, be told of plan to approach surrogate and have a legally authorized representative available to provide consent
Family/friend caregivers:
- Closest relative/next of kin/friend who is involved in the care of his/her loved one before and during the study period
- English fluency
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Primary participant:
- Enrolled in hospice
- Unable to assent to study procedures
- Expresses resistance or dissent to participation or the use of surrogate consent
Family/friend caregiver:
- Life expectancy < 1 year (e.g., metastatic cancer)
- Evidence of cognitive impairment or inability to consent to study procedures
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Støttende omsorg
- Tildeling: Ikke-randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: ImPAcTT intervention
Within 48-72 hours of enrollment in the study, the primary participant and family will receive an ImPAcTT Telehealth visit with the PC provider.
The provider will conduct a comprehensive PC assessment aligned with the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care guidelines.
Visits, which may include remote physical assessment using a digital stethoscope, dermatoscope, etc., will be documented and transmitted to the NH.
Advanced Care Planning (ACP) and goals of care discussions will be facilitated by the ability to virtually share and edit documents, such as the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST), in real time with primary participants and/or family.
The PC provider will conduct follow-up visits 1 week following the initial visit, then on a case-by-case basis.
|
ImPACTT Telehealth visit with the PC provider
|
|
Ingen inngripen: Usual care
Participants will receive the standard of care established at the NH.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Symptom distress (composite measure)
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Symptom distress as measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale - ESAS
For all symptom distress scores: High score means: worst outcome Low score means: better outcome |
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
|
Change in Symptom impact
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Symptom impact as measured by the "Quality of Life at the End of Life" - QUAL-E Symptom impact subscale: Minimum value: 3 Maximum value: 15 High score means: worst outcome Low score means: better outcome |
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in number of completed POLST forms
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Number of Physician's Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment - POLST forms completed
|
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
|
Type of changes in POLST forms
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Type of changes in Physician's Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment -POLST forms
|
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
|
Number of In-hospital death
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Number of In-hospital death
|
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
|
Change in Family Satisfaction
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Family Satisfaction as measured by the "Quality of Life at the End of Life - Family" - QUAL-E Fam Subscale: Relationship with Healthcare Provider [Questions #5-8 with 5 item Likert scales, average of 4 scores] Minimum value: 1 Maximum value: 5 High score means: worst outcome Low score means: better outcome |
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
|
Number of residents transitioned to hospice
Tidsramme: Last visit - week 12
|
Number of residents transitioned to hospice
|
Last visit - week 12
|
|
Change in acute care utilization (composite measure)
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Number of ED Visits and number of Hospitalizations
|
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
|
Change in Functional Status
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Functional Status as measured by the PalliativePerformance Scale (PPSv2) Minimum value: 0% Maximum value: 100% High score means: better outcome Low score means: worst outcome |
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
|
Change in Depression Status
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Depression as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Subscales: - Question 1: Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 27 High score means: worst outcome Low score means: better outcome - Question 2: Minimum value: 1 Maximum value: 4 High score means: worst outcome Low score means: better outcome |
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
|
Change in Cognitive Status
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Cognition as measured by the Montreal - Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 30 High score means: better outcome Low score means: worst outcome |
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
|
Change in Mortality
Tidsramme: Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Risk for dying within one year as measured by the Flacker Mortality Score Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 15.21 High score means: worst outcome Low score means: better outcome |
Baseline and Last visit -12 weeks
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Samarbeidspartnere
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: Caroline E Stephens, PhD, RN, University of Utah
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.
Generelle publikasjoner
- Stephens C, Halifax E, Bui N, Lee SJ, Harrington C, Shim J, Ritchie C. Provider Perspectives on the Influence of Family on Nursing Home Resident Transfers to the Emergency Department: Crises at the End of Life. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2015;2015:893062. doi: 10.1155/2015/893062. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
- Levy C, Morris M, Kramer A. Improving end-of-life outcomes in nursing homes by targeting residents at high-risk of mortality for palliative care: program description and evaluation. J Palliat Med. 2008 Mar;11(2):217-25. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0147.
- Casarett D, Karlawish J, Morales K, Crowley R, Mirsch T, Asch DA. Improving the use of hospice services in nursing homes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Jul 13;294(2):211-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.2.211.
- Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
- Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Miller SC, Mor V. A national study of the location of death for older persons with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Feb;53(2):299-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53118.x. Erratum In: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):741.
- National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States, 2010: With Special Feature on Death and Dying. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2011 Feb. Report No.: 2011-1232. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54381/
- Brock DB, Foley DJ. Demography and epidemiology of dying in the U.S. with emphasis on deaths of older persons. Hosp J. 1998;13(1-2):49-60. doi: 10.1080/0742-969x.1998.11882887.
- Bercovitz A, Decker FH, Jones A, Remsburg RE. End-of-life care in nursing homes: 2004 National Nursing Home Survey. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008 Oct 8;(9):1-23.
- Kaye HS, Harrington C, LaPlante MP. Long-term care: who gets it, who provides it, who pays, and how much? Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0535. Erratum In: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Mar-Apr;29(3):567.
- Stephens CE, Halifax E, David D, Bui N, Lee SJ, Shim J, Ritchie CS. "They Don't Trust Us": The Influence of Perceptions of Inadequate Nursing Home Care on Emergency Department Transfers and the Potential Role for Telehealth. Clin Nurs Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):157-168. doi: 10.1177/1054773819835015. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
- Gozalo P, Teno JM, Mitchell SL, Skinner J, Bynum J, Tyler D, Mor V. End-of-life transitions among nursing home residents with cognitive issues. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 29;365(13):1212-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1100347.
- Miller SC, Lima JC, Looze J, Mitchell SL. Dying in U.S. nursing homes with advanced dementia: how does health care use differ for residents with, versus without, end-of-life Medicare skilled nursing facility care? J Palliat Med. 2012 Jan;15(1):43-50. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0210. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
- Cohen A, Bulanda JR. Social Supports as Enabling Factors in Nursing Home Admissions: Rural, Suburban, and Urban Differences. J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Jul;35(7):721-43. doi: 10.1177/0733464814566677. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
- Bolin JN, Phillips CD, Hawes C. Urban and rural differences in end-of-life pain and treatment status on admission to a nursing facility. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Jan-Feb;23(1):51-7. doi: 10.1177/104990910602300109.
- Douthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S. Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health. 2015 Jun;129(6):611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 27.
- Matthews KA, Croft JB, Liu Y, Lu H, Kanny D, Wheaton AG, Cunningham TJ, Khan LK, Caraballo RS, Holt JB, Eke PI, Giles WH. Health-Related Behaviors by Urban-Rural County Classification - United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 3;66(5):1-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6605a1.
- Aragon K, Covinsky K, Miao Y, Boscardin WJ, Flint L, Smith AK. Use of the Medicare posthospitalization skilled nursing benefit in the last 6 months of life. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Nov 12;172(20):1573-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.4451.
- Ersek M, Carpenter JG. Geriatric palliative care in long-term care settings with a focus on nursing homes. J Palliat Med. 2013 Oct;16(10):1180-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.9474. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
- Casarett D, Pickard A, Bailey FA, Ritchie C, Furman C, Rosenfeld K, Shreve S, Chen Z, Shea JA. Do palliative consultations improve patient outcomes? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Apr;56(4):593-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01610.x. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
- Finlay IG, Higginson IJ, Goodwin DM, Cook AM, Edwards AG, Hood K, Douglas HR, Normand CE. Palliative care in hospital, hospice, at home: results from a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2002;13 Suppl 4:257-64. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf668. No abstract available.
- Hall S, Kolliakou A, Petkova H, Froggatt K, Higginson IJ. Interventions for improving palliative care for older people living in nursing care homes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;2011(3):CD007132. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007132.pub2.
- Berkowitz RE, Jones RN, Rieder R, Bryan M, Schreiber R, Verney S, Paasche-Orlow MK. Improving disposition outcomes for patients in a geriatric skilled nursing facility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jun;59(6):1130-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03417.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
- Miller SC, Dahal R, Lima JC, Intrator O, Martin E, Bull J, Hanson LC. Palliative Care Consultations in Nursing Homes and End-of-Life Hospitalizations. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Dec;52(6):878-883. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
- Miller SC, Lima JC, Intrator O, Martin E, Bull J, Hanson LC. Palliative Care Consultations in Nursing Homes and Reductions in Acute Care Use and Potentially Burdensome End-of-Life Transitions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2280-2287. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14469. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
- Stephens CE, Hunt LJ, Bui N, Halifax E, Ritchie CS, Lee SJ. Palliative Care Eligibility, Symptom Burden, and Quality-of-Life Ratings in Nursing Home Residents. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):141-142. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6299.
- Zerzan J, Stearns S, Hanson L. Access to palliative care and hospice in nursing homes. JAMA. 2000 Nov 15;284(19):2489-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.19.2489.
- Happ MB, Capezuti E, Strumpf NE, Wagner L, Cunningham S, Evans L, Maislin G. Advance care planning and end-of-life care for hospitalized nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 May;50(5):829-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50207.x.
- Johnston B, Kidd L, Wengstrom Y, Kearney N. An evaluation of the use of Telehealth within palliative care settings across Scotland. Palliat Med. 2012 Mar;26(2):152-61. doi: 10.1177/0269216311398698. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
- Low JA, Beins G, Lee KK, Koh E. Last moments of life: can telemedicine play a role? Palliat Support Care. 2013 Aug;11(4):353-5. doi: 10.1017/S1478951512000995. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
- Wowchuk SM, McClement S, Bond J Jr. The challenge of providing palliative care in the nursing home part II: internal factors. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2007 Jul;13(7):345-50. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2007.13.7.24346.
- Travis SS, Loving G, McClanahan L, Bernard M. Hospitalization patterns and palliation in the last year of life among residents in long-term care. Gerontologist. 2001 Apr;41(2):153-60. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.2.153.
- Teno JM, Branco KJ, Mor V, Phillips CD, Hawes C, Morris J, Fries BE. Changes in advance care planning in nursing homes before and after the patient Self-Determination Act: report of a 10-state survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Aug;45(8):939-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02963.x.
- Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, Welch LC, Wetle T, Shield R, Mor V. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.
- Miller SC, Teno JM, Mor V. Hospice and palliative care in nursing homes. Clin Geriatr Med. 2004 Nov;20(4):717-34, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2004.07.005.
- Huskamp HA, Stevenson DG, Chernew ME, Newhouse JP. A new medicare end-of-life benefit for nursing home residents. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):130-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0523.
- Stevenson DG, Bramson JS. Hospice care in the nursing home setting: a review of the literature. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Sep;38(3):440-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.006.
- Ding J, Saunders C, Cook A, Johnson CE. End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges? BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jun 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0435-4.
- Carlson MD, Lim B, Meier DE. Strategies and innovative models for delivering palliative care in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Feb;12(2):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.07.016. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
- Lupu D; American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Workforce Task Force. Estimate of current hospice and palliative medicine physician workforce shortage. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Dec;40(6):899-911. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.07.004.
- Edirippulige S, Martin-Khan M, Beattie E, Smith AC, Gray LC. A systematic review of telemedicine services for residents in long term care facilities. J Telemed Telecare. 2013 Apr;19(3):127-132. doi: 10.1177/1357633X13483256. Epub 2013 May 23.
- Rogante M, Giacomozzi C, Grigioni M, Kairy D. Telemedicine in palliative care: a review of systematic reviews. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016 Jul-Sep;52(3):434-442. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_03_16.
- Oliver DP, Demiris G, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Washington K, Day T, Novak H. A systematic review of the evidence base for telehospice. Telemed J E Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):38-47. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0061. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
- Capurro D, Ganzinger M, Perez-Lu J, Knaup P. Effectiveness of eHealth interventions and information needs in palliative care: a systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 7;16(3):e72. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2812.
- Kidd L, Cayless S, Johnston B, Wengstrom Y. Telehealth in palliative care in the UK: a review of the evidence. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(7):394-402. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.091108. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
- McCall K, Keen J, Farrer K, Maguire R, McCann L, Johnston B, McGill M, Sage M, Kearney N. Perceptions of the use of a remote monitoring system in patients receiving palliative care at home. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2008 Sep;14(9):426-31. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2008.14.9.31121.
- Roglieri JL, Futterman R, McDonough KL, Malya G, Karwath KR, Bowman D, Skelly J, Warburton SW Jr. Disease management interventions to improve outcomes in congestive heart failure. Am J Manag Care. 1997 Dec;3(12):1831-9.
- Lind L, Karlsson D. A system for symptom assessment in advanced palliative home healthcare using digital pens. Med Inform Internet Med. 2004 Sep-Dec;29(3-4):199-210. doi: 10.1080/14639230400005966.
- Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1517-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1517.
- Hammett L, Harvath TA, Flaherty-Robb M, Sawyer G, Olson D. Remote wound care consultation for nursing homes: using a web-based assessment and care planning tool. J Gerontol Nurs. 2007 Nov;33(11):27-35; quiz 36-7. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20071101-09.
- Rabinowitz T, Murphy KM, Amour JL, Ricci MA, Caputo MP, Newhouse PA. Benefits of a telepsychiatry consultation service for rural nursing home residents. Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):34-40. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0088.
- Yeung A, Johnson DP, Trinh NH, Weng WC, Kvedar J, Fava M. Feasibility and effectiveness of telepsychiatry services for chinese immigrants in a nursing home. Telemed J E Health. 2009 May;15(4):336-41. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0138.
- Biglan KM, Voss TS, Deuel LM, Miller D, Eason S, Fagnano M, George BP, Appler A, Polanowicz J, Viti L, Smith S, Joseph A, Dorsey ER. Telemedicine for the care of nursing home residents with Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2009 May 15;24(7):1073-6. doi: 10.1002/mds.22498.
- Michener L, Cook J, Ahmed SM, Yonas MA, Coyne-Beasley T, Aguilar-Gaxiola S. Aligning the goals of community-engaged research: why and how academic health centers can successfully engage with communities to improve health. Acad Med. 2012 Mar;87(3):285-91. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182441680.
- Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV; Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA. 2014 Oct 15;312(15):1513-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11100. No abstract available.
- Collier A, Morgan DD, Swetenham K, To TH, Currow DC, Tieman JJ. Implementation of a pilot telehealth programme in community palliative care: A qualitative study of clinicians' perspectives. Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):409-17. doi: 10.1177/0269216315600113. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
- May C, Harrison R, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Mair F, Wallace P; Telemedicine Adoption Study Group. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):596-604. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1145. Epub 2003 Aug 4.
- Yellowlees PM. Successfully developing a telemedicine system. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(7):331-5. doi: 10.1258/135763305774472024.
- Miller EA. Solving the disjuncture between research and practice: telehealth trends in the 21st century. Health Policy. 2007 Jul;82(2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.011. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
- Stillman D, Strumpf N, Capezuti E, Tuch H. Staff perceptions concerning barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care in the nursing home. Geriatr Nurs. 2005 Jul-Aug;26(4):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2005.06.002.
- Froggatt K. Evaluating a palliative care education project in nursing homes. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2000 Mar;6(3):140-6. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2000.6.3.8941.
- Ouslander JG, Bonner A, Herndon L, Shutes J. The Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT) quality improvement program: an overview for medical directors and primary care clinicians in long term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Mar;15(3):162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.12.005.
- Saliba D, Buchanan J, Edelen MO, Streim J, Ouslander J, Berlowitz D, Chodosh J. MDS 3.0: brief interview for mental status. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Sep;13(7):611-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
- Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77-84. doi: 10.1002/nur.20362.
- Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, Bosworth HB, McNeilly M, Christakis NA, Voils CI, Tulsky JA. Measuring quality of life at the end of life: validation of the QUAL-E. Palliat Support Care. 2004 Mar;2(1):3-14. doi: 10.1017/s1478951504040027.
Hjelpsomme linker
- National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care, 3rd ed., Pittsburgh, PA. 2013.
- Improving palliative care in nursing homes [online report]. New York: Center to Advance Palliative Care. 2008.
- Corbin J, Strauss A, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research. Sage; 2014.
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
19. februar 2018
Primær fullføring (Forventet)
30. juni 2022
Studiet fullført (Forventet)
30. juni 2022
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
4. mai 2021
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
7. juli 2021
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
20. juli 2021
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
20. juli 2021
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
7. juli 2021
Sist bekreftet
1. juli 2021
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Nøkkelord
Andre studie-ID-numre
- IRB_00129094
- 5K76AG054862-05 (U.S. NIH-stipend/kontrakt)
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
JA
IPD-planbeskrivelse
Data (complete dataset with full documentation including metadata, protocols, etc) will be made available by the online publication date unless the NIH policy specifies an earlier date. The PI will work the primary mentor to ensure that the study data are submitted to the PCRC De-identified Data Repository. (https://palliativecareresearch.org/corescenters/data-informatics-statistics-core-disc/pcrc-de-identified-data-repository-didr).
This would allow for secondary data analyses of the data to be conducted and support those who need access to these datasets for preliminary data and/or grant proposal preparation. Human subject data will be shared with other investigators within the limits of HIPAA and other patient confidentiality requirements, including the removal of all participant identifiers from all source documents and the use of unique participant identification numbers, and in accordance with PCRC protocols.
IPD-delingstidsramme
Data will be made available by the online publication date unless the NIH policy specifies an earlier date.
Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling
This study has specific data and resource sharing plans to make data available both to the community of scientists interested in palliative care and nursing home research to avoid unintentional duplication of research.
Moreover, the investigator would welcome collaboration with others who could make use of the Telehealth visit protocols developed in this ImPAcTT project.
IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SEVJE
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Nei
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .