Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Community Popular Opinion Leader Intervention for HIV Prevention Uptake in Rural South Africa (Izinkanyezi)

30. juli 2026 oppdatert av: Africa Health Research Institute

Adapting and Piloting a Community Popular Opinion Leader Intervention to Increase Uptake of HIV Prevention Interventions in Rural South Africa

The Community Popular Opinion Leader (CPOL) is an intervention dveloped in the United States which identifies, trains, and enlists key opinion leaders within communities to deliver messages to peers and help link them to services. This project involves testing the feasibility and acceptability of such a localized version of the CPOL intervention in rural South Africa. This will be achieved through a pilot intervention in three purposively selected communities in the Hlabisa sub-district of uMkhanyakude district, KwaZulu-Natal. The investigators will select potential peer leaders in three ways (at random; based on nominations by peers; based on statistical analysis of previously collected social network data). Peer leaders will be invited to attend four weekly training sessions to learn about HIV prevention and persuasive communication. They will then be coached to start HIV prevention conversations with peers, including provision of HIV self-test kits and linkage to healthcare services. The investigators will evaluate this pilot using group discussions, in-depth interviews and brief pre/post questionnaires with session facilitators, peer leaders, contacted peers and healthcare providers. The investigators will analyse the data collected with the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) dissemination and implementation framework, identifying factors likely to affect Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM).

Studieoversikt

Status

Har ikke rekruttert ennå

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Detaljert beskrivelse

The CPOL intervention is a local adaptation of an intervention package developed with Black men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) in the United States. This pilot trial studies both the overall effectiveness of this adapated intervention in rural South Africa, and the differential benefit of selecting participants using three different methods: 1) at random; 2) based on peer nominations of local opinion leaders; 3) based on a community-wide social network built from nominations of important social contacts. While the primary outcome is quantitative, the study is not powered to see statistically significant differences between arms. The evaluation focus of the pilot trial is the process evaluation, which will follow the RE-AIM framework to assess how and why the intervention worked, failed or needed adjustment. The end result will be a CPOL-style intervention package that may (or may not) be appropriate for rural South Africa, and a methodology for adapting CPOL packages for other sexual health contexts.

The process evaluation will include qualitative group and in-depth one-to-one interviews with: (i) session trainers; (ii) POL trainees; (iii) peers in the local community; (iii) HIV service providers. It will also include a short pre/post questionnaire for all trainees to capture key knowledge and attitude outcomes relating to the training.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

60

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Studiesteder

  • Sør-Afrika
    • KwaZulu-Natal
      • uMkhanyakude, KwaZulu-Natal, Sør-Afrika
        • Africa Health Research Institute
        • Hovedetterforsker:
          • Guy Harling, ScD

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Resident in Sixhumene study area household

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Forebygging
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Random selection
Invitation to participate in the group training is based on a random selection from all age-eligible individuals in the study area
Atferdsmessig: CPOL group training
Trained research assistants will deliver four two-hour training sessions to a group of ~20 young adults, leading to the trainees providing sexual health information and HIV self-tests (with onward self-referral to local clinics) to their friends and close contacts. Sessions include training on local sexual health information, effective communication strategies, practice conversations and feedback.
Eksperimentell: Nomination
Invitation to participate in the group training is based nominations by peers in the study area
Atferdsmessig: CPOL group training
Trained research assistants will deliver four two-hour training sessions to a group of ~20 young adults, leading to the trainees providing sexual health information and HIV self-tests (with onward self-referral to local clinics) to their friends and close contacts. Sessions include training on local sexual health information, effective communication strategies, practice conversations and feedback.
Eksperimentell: Network graph-based
Invitation to participate in the group training is based centrality within a community-wide social network map built from a survey in the study area
Atferdsmessig: CPOL group training
Trained research assistants will deliver four two-hour training sessions to a group of ~20 young adults, leading to the trainees providing sexual health information and HIV self-tests (with onward self-referral to local clinics) to their friends and close contacts. Sessions include training on local sexual health information, effective communication strategies, practice conversations and feedback.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Number of HIV self-tests distributed
Tidsramme: From enrollment to 4 weeks after last training session
The mean number of HIV self-tests distributed to peers by trainees
From enrollment to 4 weeks after last training session

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Number of peer conversations held
Tidsramme: Enrollemnt to 4 weeks after last training session
Mean number of conversations trainees report holding with peers
Enrollemnt to 4 weeks after last training session
Trainee HIV ART knowledge improvement
Tidsramme: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 5-item ART knowledge question set [range 0-5; higher = better]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Trainee HIV PrEP knowledge improvement
Tidsramme: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 5-item PrEP knowledge question set [range 0-5; higher = better]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Trainee generalized self-efficacy improvement
Tidsramme: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on the Generalized Self Efficacy-short form (GSE 6) scale [range 6-24; higher = better]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Trainee ART/PrEP self-efficacy improvement
Tidsramme: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 4-item self-efficacy-short form scale specific to ART and PrEP use [range 4-16; higher = better]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Trainee ART/PrEP stigma reduction
Tidsramme: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 6-item ART/PrEP use stigma question set [range 6-24; higher = worse]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Barriers and Facilitators to Participant Engagement Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Tidsramme: Enrollment to 4 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation of participant engagement using qualitative methods. Data will be collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees and peers. Qualitative thematic analysis will be used to identify barriers and facilitators to engagement, participation, and intervention reach.
Enrollment to 4 weeks after last training session
Trainee Confidence in Conducting Peer Conversations Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Tidsramme: Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees. Qualitative thematic analysis will explore participants' confidence in initiating and conducting peer conversations following the training programme.
Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Facilitators and Barriers to Peer Conversations Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Tidsramme: Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees. Qualitative thematic analysis will identify perceived facilitators and barriers influencing the conduct of peer conversations.
Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Perceptions of the Training Programme Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Tidsramme: Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees and trainers. Qualitative thematic analysis will explore acceptability, perceived value, strengths, and limitations of the training programme.
Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Intervention Adaptations Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Tidsramme: Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees and trainers. Qualitative thematic analysis will identify the types of adaptations made during trial implementation and the reasons for these adaptations at both individual and programme levels.
Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

Africa Health Research Institute

Samarbeidspartnere

University College, London

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Generelle publikasjoner

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

1. august 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

1. oktober 2026

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

1. oktober 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

21. juli 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

30. juli 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

3. august 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

3. august 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

30. juli 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juli 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Nøkkelord

Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • A0006-7968/2024

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

Quantitative data from the pre/post questionnaire and any qualitative data that can be meaningfully anonymized.

IPD-delingstidsramme

Data will be available once the primary paper analysing the feasbility trial is complete and accepted for publication. The data will be available in perpetuity.

Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling

The PI and AHRI data guardian will be responsible for overseeing requests for data sharing and that the researchers granted access to the data comply with the terms of the data sharing agreement, which will include honouring any commitments about the use of the data that have been made to participants at the time they granted consent. Researchers will be required to acknowledge the source of the data. The terms will also prohibit researchers attempting to identify participants of the study.

IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere