Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Community Popular Opinion Leader Intervention for HIV Prevention Uptake in Rural South Africa (Izinkanyezi)

30 lipca 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Africa Health Research Institute

Adapting and Piloting a Community Popular Opinion Leader Intervention to Increase Uptake of HIV Prevention Interventions in Rural South Africa

The Community Popular Opinion Leader (CPOL) is an intervention dveloped in the United States which identifies, trains, and enlists key opinion leaders within communities to deliver messages to peers and help link them to services. This project involves testing the feasibility and acceptability of such a localized version of the CPOL intervention in rural South Africa. This will be achieved through a pilot intervention in three purposively selected communities in the Hlabisa sub-district of uMkhanyakude district, KwaZulu-Natal. The investigators will select potential peer leaders in three ways (at random; based on nominations by peers; based on statistical analysis of previously collected social network data). Peer leaders will be invited to attend four weekly training sessions to learn about HIV prevention and persuasive communication. They will then be coached to start HIV prevention conversations with peers, including provision of HIV self-test kits and linkage to healthcare services. The investigators will evaluate this pilot using group discussions, in-depth interviews and brief pre/post questionnaires with session facilitators, peer leaders, contacted peers and healthcare providers. The investigators will analyse the data collected with the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) dissemination and implementation framework, identifying factors likely to affect Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM).

Przegląd badań

Status

Jeszcze nie rekrutacja

Warunki

Interwencja / Leczenie

Szczegółowy opis

The CPOL intervention is a local adaptation of an intervention package developed with Black men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) in the United States. This pilot trial studies both the overall effectiveness of this adapated intervention in rural South Africa, and the differential benefit of selecting participants using three different methods: 1) at random; 2) based on peer nominations of local opinion leaders; 3) based on a community-wide social network built from nominations of important social contacts. While the primary outcome is quantitative, the study is not powered to see statistically significant differences between arms. The evaluation focus of the pilot trial is the process evaluation, which will follow the RE-AIM framework to assess how and why the intervention worked, failed or needed adjustment. The end result will be a CPOL-style intervention package that may (or may not) be appropriate for rural South Africa, and a methodology for adapting CPOL packages for other sexual health contexts.

The process evaluation will include qualitative group and in-depth one-to-one interviews with: (i) session trainers; (ii) POL trainees; (iii) peers in the local community; (iii) HIV service providers. It will also include a short pre/post questionnaire for all trainees to capture key knowledge and attitude outcomes relating to the training.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Szacowany)

60

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

Lokalizacje studiów

  • Afryka Południowa
    • KwaZulu-Natal
      • uMkhanyakude, KwaZulu-Natal, Afryka Południowa
        • Africa Health Research Institute
        • Główny śledczy:
          • Guy Harling, ScD

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Tak

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Resident in Sixhumene study area household

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Zapobieganie
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Eksperymentalny: Random selection
Invitation to participate in the group training is based on a random selection from all age-eligible individuals in the study area
Behawioralne: CPOL group training
Trained research assistants will deliver four two-hour training sessions to a group of ~20 young adults, leading to the trainees providing sexual health information and HIV self-tests (with onward self-referral to local clinics) to their friends and close contacts. Sessions include training on local sexual health information, effective communication strategies, practice conversations and feedback.
Eksperymentalny: Nomination
Invitation to participate in the group training is based nominations by peers in the study area
Behawioralne: CPOL group training
Trained research assistants will deliver four two-hour training sessions to a group of ~20 young adults, leading to the trainees providing sexual health information and HIV self-tests (with onward self-referral to local clinics) to their friends and close contacts. Sessions include training on local sexual health information, effective communication strategies, practice conversations and feedback.
Eksperymentalny: Network graph-based
Invitation to participate in the group training is based centrality within a community-wide social network map built from a survey in the study area
Behawioralne: CPOL group training
Trained research assistants will deliver four two-hour training sessions to a group of ~20 young adults, leading to the trainees providing sexual health information and HIV self-tests (with onward self-referral to local clinics) to their friends and close contacts. Sessions include training on local sexual health information, effective communication strategies, practice conversations and feedback.

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Number of HIV self-tests distributed
Ramy czasowe: From enrollment to 4 weeks after last training session
The mean number of HIV self-tests distributed to peers by trainees
From enrollment to 4 weeks after last training session

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Number of peer conversations held
Ramy czasowe: Enrollemnt to 4 weeks after last training session
Mean number of conversations trainees report holding with peers
Enrollemnt to 4 weeks after last training session
Trainee HIV ART knowledge improvement
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 5-item ART knowledge question set [range 0-5; higher = better]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Trainee HIV PrEP knowledge improvement
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 5-item PrEP knowledge question set [range 0-5; higher = better]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Trainee generalized self-efficacy improvement
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on the Generalized Self Efficacy-short form (GSE 6) scale [range 6-24; higher = better]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Trainee ART/PrEP self-efficacy improvement
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 4-item self-efficacy-short form scale specific to ART and PrEP use [range 4-16; higher = better]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Trainee ART/PrEP stigma reduction
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)
Mean change in scores pre/post intervention on a 6-item ART/PrEP use stigma question set [range 6-24; higher = worse]
Enrollment to end of last session (4 week period)

Inne miary wyników

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Barriers and Facilitators to Participant Engagement Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to 4 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation of participant engagement using qualitative methods. Data will be collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees and peers. Qualitative thematic analysis will be used to identify barriers and facilitators to engagement, participation, and intervention reach.
Enrollment to 4 weeks after last training session
Trainee Confidence in Conducting Peer Conversations Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees. Qualitative thematic analysis will explore participants' confidence in initiating and conducting peer conversations following the training programme.
Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Facilitators and Barriers to Peer Conversations Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees. Qualitative thematic analysis will identify perceived facilitators and barriers influencing the conduct of peer conversations.
Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Perceptions of the Training Programme Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees and trainers. Qualitative thematic analysis will explore acceptability, perceived value, strengths, and limitations of the training programme.
Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Intervention Adaptations Assessed Through Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
Ramy czasowe: Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session
Process evaluation outcome assessed through semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with trainees and trainers. Qualitative thematic analysis will identify the types of adaptations made during trial implementation and the reasons for these adaptations at both individual and programme levels.
Enrollment to 12 weeks after last training session

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Sponsor

Africa Health Research Institute

Współpracownicy

University College, London

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Publikacje ogólne

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)

1 sierpnia 2026

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

1 października 2026

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

1 października 2026

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

21 lipca 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

30 lipca 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

3 sierpnia 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

3 sierpnia 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

30 lipca 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 lipca 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Słowa kluczowe

Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • A0006-7968/2024

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

TAK

Opis planu IPD

Quantitative data from the pre/post questionnaire and any qualitative data that can be meaningfully anonymized.

Ramy czasowe udostępniania IPD

Data will be available once the primary paper analysing the feasbility trial is complete and accepted for publication. The data will be available in perpetuity.

Kryteria dostępu do udostępniania IPD

The PI and AHRI data guardian will be responsible for overseeing requests for data sharing and that the researchers granted access to the data comply with the terms of the data sharing agreement, which will include honouring any commitments about the use of the data that have been made to participants at the time they granted consent. Researchers will be required to acknowledge the source of the data. The terms will also prohibit researchers attempting to identify participants of the study.

Typ informacji pomocniczych dotyczących udostępniania IPD

  • PROTOKÓŁ BADANIA
  • ICF
  • ANALITYCZNY_KOD

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj