Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Dose-Response and Phase-Specific Effects of Graded Cognitive Load on Functional Mobility in Older Adults: A Kinematic Analysis (CL)

5. september 2026 oppdatert av: Mostafa Abd-Elsamie Mohamed Abd-Elhamied seliem, Cairo University
This study will be conducted to investigate the effect of dose-response and phase-specific effects of Graded Cognitive Load affect on functional mobility in Older Adults

Studieoversikt

Status

Har ikke rekruttert ennå

Forhold

Detaljert beskrivelse

Aging is associated with progressive changes in both the central nervous system and the musculoskeletal system, leading to declines in motor performance, balance, and functional mobility. These changes include reduced cortical processing efficiency, slower information processing speed, and alterations in sensorimotor integration, all of which contribute to decreased movement efficiency in older adults. Functional mobility, particularly walking and transitional movements, is no longer considered a purely automatic motor task, but rather a cognitively mediated activity that requires continuous interaction between attentional resources and motor control systems. Clinically, previous studies have demonstrated that dual-task performance is strongly associated with fall risk and mobility impairment in older adults, suggesting 6 its importance in functional assessment and rehabilitation planning.Despite these advances, most of the existing research has primarily focused on binary dual-task paradigms, comparing single-task versus dual-task conditions without considering different levels of cognitive demand. This approach limits the ability to understand whether cognitive-motor interference follows a dose-response relationship, where progressively increasing cognitive load produces graded deterioration in motor performance. Furthermore, while overall gait and mobility outcomes have been widely investigated, there is a lack of detailed evidence regarding how cognitive load influences specific phases of functional mobility tasks, such as sit-to-stand, gait, turning, and stand-to-sit transitions. Previous studies suggest that different movement phases may vary in their sensitivity to cognitive interference due to differences in biomechanical and postural control demands. However, this phasespecific behavior remains underexplored, particularly in the context of graded cognitive loading.

Therefore, there is a clear gap in the literature regarding the combined effect of graded cognitive load and phase-specific motor behavior during functional mobility tasks.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

60

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiekontakt

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Ability to ambulate independently without assistive devices
  • Ability to follow verbal instructions and perform dual-task activities
  • Medically stable and capable of participating in functional mobility assessment Cognitive function within normal range, defined as Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 24 out of 30, indicating absence of significant cognitive impairment .
  • Functionqal independence in basic activities of daily living, defined as Barthel Index score ≥ 90 out of 100
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m², as values ≥ 30 kg/m² (obesity) may adversely affect gait and balance performance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any neurological disease that affects walking or balance, such as stroke or Parkinson's disease
  • Any musculoskeletal condition that limits lower-limb movement or affects normal walking patterns
  • Severe cognitive impairment defined as Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score < 24
  • Visual, vestibular, or hearing problems that affect safe walking or balance control
  • History of lower-limb injury or surgery within the last 6 months
  • Serious medical conditions that make participation unsafe, such as unstable cardiac or respiratory disease

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Enkeltgruppeoppdrag
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Dual-Task Cognitive Loading Protocol
sixty Participants will perform the time-up-and-go test under four standardized experimental conditions designed to investigate the dose-response and phase-specific effects of graded cognitive load on functional mobility in older adults.

Participants will perform the TUG test under four standardized experimental conditions:

1. Single-Task Condition (Baseline) : Participants will perform TUG test without any additional cognitive task.

2-Low Cognitive Load Condition:Participants will perform the TUG test while simultaneously performing simple backward counting by ones starting from a randomly assigned number between 90 and 100.

3-Moderate Cognitive Load Condition :Participants will perform the TUG test while simultaneously performing serial backward counting by threes starting from a randomly assigned number between 90 and 100.

4-High Cognitive Load Condition:Participants will perform the TUG test while simultaneously performing serial subtraction by sevens (Serial 7s task) starting from a randomly assigned number between 90 and 100.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Completion Time
Tidsramme: up to one day
A smartwatch will be used to assess the completion time of the TUG test. The total time required to complete the TUG test under each cognitive load condition will be recorded in seconds and used as the primary measure of functional mobility performance. Increased TUG completion time will indicate deterioration in functional mobility under cognitive interference conditions
up to one day

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
sit-to-stand phase time
Tidsramme: up to one day
A smartwatch will be used to assess the time of sit-to-stand phase as a part of the TUG test
up to one day
walking phase time
Tidsramme: up to one day
The smartwatch will be used to assess the time of the walking phase as a part of TUG test
up to one day
turning phase time
Tidsramme: up to one day
The smartwatch will be used to assess the time of the turning phase as a part of TUG test
up to one day
stand-to-sit phase
Tidsramme: up to one day
The smartwatch will be used to assess the time of the stand-to-sit phase as a part of TUG tes
up to one day
gait speed
Tidsramme: up to one day
A sagittal-plane video-based kinematic analysis system will be used to evaluate gait speed.ormal gait speed for healthy adults generally ranges from 1.2 to 1.4 meters per second (m/s)
up to one day
step length
Tidsramme: up to one day
A sagittal-plane video-based kinematic analysis system will be used to evaluate step length. The normal walking step length is about 2.5 feet (75 to 79 cm) for men and 2.2 feet (66 to 69 cm) for women
up to one day
cadence
Tidsramme: up to one day
A sagittal-plane video-based kinematic analysis system will be used to evaluate cadence. A normal comfortable walking cadence for healthy adults generally ranges from 100 to 120 steps per minute
up to one day
step time
Tidsramme: up to one day
A sagittal-plane video-based kinematic analysis system will be used to evaluate step time. the normal step time for a healthy adult walking at a comfortable, self-selected speed is approximately 0.5 seconds per single step
up to one day
turning duration
Tidsramme: up to one day
A sagittal-plane video-based kinematic analysis system will be used to evaluate turning duration.For healthy, normal adults, the average turning durations typically fall into these ranges from 1.4 to 1.5 seconds
up to one day
peak trunk flexion angle
Tidsramme: up to one day
sagittal-plane video-based kinematic analysis system will be used to evaluate peak trunk flexion.Studies show that actively flexing the trunk increases peak angles (reaching higher ranges like an added 47° in intentional flexed landings vs. preferred landings) which helps absorb impact and protect the knees
up to one day
peak hip flexion angle
Tidsramme: up to one day
the sagittal-plane video-based kinematic analysis system will be used to evaluate peak hip flexion angle. it should be from 130-140 degree.
up to one day
peak knee flexion angle
Tidsramme: up to one day
The sagittal-plane video-based kinematic analysis system will be used to evaluate peak knee flexion angle. it should be from 120-150 degree.
up to one day

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

20. september 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

20. februar 2027

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

20. februar 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

5. september 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

5. september 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

10. september 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

10. september 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

5. september 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. september 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere