Effectiveness of an Online Safety Tool for Canadian Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence
23 kwietnia 2019 zaktualizowane przez: Marilyn Ford-Gilboe, Western University, Canada
Testing an Internet-based Safety Decision Aid for Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an interactive, online safety decision aid among diverse Canadian women who are experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV).
The investigators will also explore how the online intervention works, and whether it has different effects for different groups of women.
Przegląd badań
Status
Zakończony
Warunki
Szczegółowy opis
1 in 3 Canadian women experience IPV in their lifetimes. Over time, chronic stress of living in an abusive relationship has been shown to contribute to depression, anxiety and PTSD. Safety planning to reduce the risk of physical and emotional harm in abusive situations is one of the most widely recommended interventions for women in abusive relationship. However, fewer than 1 in 5 Canadian women access support from violence services to assist them in safety planning. Rural, Aboriginal, racialized, immigrant, sexual minority women and women who prioritize their privacy face particular barriers to accessing information and support for safety planning.
We adapted an interactive, online safety decision aid (SDA) recently developed and tested in the U.S. (Glass and colleagues, 2010) so that it applies to diverse groups of Canadian women, and extends the focus on emotional safety. The tool was revised based on a pilot testing for content and usability with 30 women (15 women who had experienced IPV and 15 service providers/experts). In this study, we test the effectiveness of this new tool, called "I CAN Plan 4 Safety" in a sample of 450 women from 3 provinces (ON, BC, New Brunswick). Women will be randomly assigned to complete either the personalized online safety decision aid (intervention) or an online tool which contains general risk and safety information (usual care control). Both tools are located on a confidential, password protected website. After initial completion of the online tools, they will be asked to login to the websites 3, 6 and 12 months later to complete standard outcome assessments. Women may access the information and resources in the online tools at any time for a 12 month period after they enrol in the study.
Typ studiów
Interwencyjne
Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)
462
Faza
- Nie dotyczy
Kontakty i lokalizacje
Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.
Lokalizacje studiów
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Kanada
- University of British Columbia
-
-
New Brunswick
-
Fredericton, New Brunswick, Kanada, N5X 1V5
- University of New Brunswick
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Kanada, N6A 3C1
- Western University
-
-
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
19 lat i starsze (Dorosły, Starszy dorosły)
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Tak
Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki
Kobieta
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women
- 19 years and older,
- English-speaking,
- Living in Ontario, New Brunswick, or British Columbia,
- Reports current physical, sexual or emotional abuse in the context of coercive control from a current or former partner (boyfriend, girlfriend, husband, wife, or intimate/sexual partner)
- Expresses comfort with and access to a safe computer with internet
- Access to safe email and mailing address
Exclusion Criteria:
- Men
- Under 19 years of age
- Cannot read/speak English
- Living outside of the 3 study sites
- Uncomfortable using a computer or internet
- No access to a safe computer with internet
- No access to safe email and mailing address
- Does not report current violence from an intimate partner
Plan studiów
Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
- Główny cel: Zapobieganie
- Przydział: Randomizowane
- Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
- Maskowanie: Podwójnie
Broń i interwencje
Grupa uczestników / Arm |
Interwencja / Leczenie |
|---|---|
|
Eksperymentalny: Personalized online Safety Decision Aid
Setting priorities for safety; Danger Assessment; Personalized Action Plan
|
Participants rate the importance of 5 priorities to decision-making about their unsafe relationship by comparing the relative importance of each pair of priorities.
Weights for each priority are computed and provided to the woman, along with examples of safety strategies that fit with her top ranked priority.
Participants complete a calendar to show episodes of physical and/or sexual violence they have experienced in the past 12, along with 20 questions assessing risk of serious or lethal violence.
A standardized weighted score is provided, along with a brief explanation about her level of danger and appropriate actions she may take.
Women create a tailored action plan for themselves by selecting strategies from 8 different groups, including those which are recommended to them based on their responses to previous questions.
|
|
Aktywny komparator: General Online Risk/Safety Information
General Risk and Safety Information; Basic Emergency Safety Plan
|
Participants receive general information about the importance of priorities in making safety decisions and risk factors for intimate partner violence.
Participants are provided with a basic emergency plan including information about local DV resources.
The information is not personalized but is consistent with online information which women could find on their own (usual care)
|
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in depressive symptoms on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Revised
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 12 months
|
20 item self-report measure used to measure depressive symptoms in community samples and assess the probability of meeting criteria for major depressive disorder
|
baseline, 12 months
|
|
Changes in PTSD symptomology on the PTSD Checklist (Civilian Version)
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 12 months
|
17 item self-report measure of PTSD symptoms designed for use in community samples and to assess probability of meeting DSM-IV diagnostic criterial for PTSD
|
baseline, 12 months
|
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Decisional Conflict on the low literacy version of the Decisional Conflict Scale
Ramy czasowe: baseline, immediately post-intervention
|
The low literacy version of the Decisional Conflict Scale is an established, self-report measure developed by the Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group.
|
baseline, immediately post-intervention
|
|
Changes in use of safety strategies on a Safety Behavior Checklist
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 6 months
|
self-report measure of use and helpfulness of strategies to deal with violence, adapted from Goodman et als (2003) Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index
|
baseline, 6 months
|
|
Changes in use of safety strategies on a Safety Behavior Checklist
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 12 months
|
self-report measure of use and helpfulness of strategies to deal with violence, adapted from Goodman et als (2003) Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index
|
baseline, 12 months
|
|
Change in Mastery on Pearlin's Mastery Scale
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 12 months
|
baseline, 12 months
|
|
|
changes in self-efficacy for safety planning on investigator developed scales
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 6 months
|
2 self-report items which assess self-efficacy in making a safety plan for self and for children on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (range 0-100).
|
baseline, 6 months
|
|
changes in self-efficacy for safety planning on investigator developed scales
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 12 months
|
2 self-report items which assess self-efficacy in making a safety plan for self and for children on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (range 0-100).
|
baseline, 12 months
|
Inne miary wyników
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
|---|---|---|
|
Severity of violence on the Composite Abuse Scale
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 6, 12 months
|
30 item validated measure of severity of intimate partner violence
|
baseline, 6, 12 months
|
|
Social support on the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
|
5 item self-report measure of perceived social support, adapted by McCarrier et al (2011) from the MOS-SS scale
|
baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
|
|
Helpfulness of the online tool to decision making on the Preparation for Decision making scale
Ramy czasowe: immediately post-intervention, 6, 12 months
|
10 item self-report measure of helpfulness of the online tool, adapted to IPV context by Glass et al (2010) from the standardized measure developed by the Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group.
|
immediately post-intervention, 6, 12 months
|
|
Coercive control on the Women's Experiences of Battering Scale (WEB)
Ramy czasowe: baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
|
10 item self-report measure of women's responses to partner violence which is a proxy for current level of coercive control
|
baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.
Sponsor
Współpracownicy
Śledczy
- Główny śledczy: Marilyn Ford-Gilboe, PhD, Western University
Publikacje i pomocne linki
Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.
Publikacje ogólne
- Ford-Gilboe M, Varcoe C, Scott-Storey K, Perrin N, Wuest J, Wathen CN, Case J, Glass N. Longitudinal impacts of an online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8152-8.
- Ford-Gilboe M, Varcoe C, Scott-Storey K, Wuest J, Case J, Currie LM, Glass N, Hodgins M, MacMillan H, Perrin N, Wathen CN. A tailored online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: the iCAN Plan 4 Safety randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4143-9.
Daty zapisu na studia
Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów
1 października 2014
Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)
1 stycznia 2017
Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)
1 marca 2017
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
2 października 2014
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
7 października 2014
Pierwszy wysłany (Oszacować)
8 października 2014
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
24 kwietnia 2019
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
23 kwietnia 2019
Ostatnia weryfikacja
1 kwietnia 2019
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Słowa kluczowe
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- HSREB 105436
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .