Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Effectiveness of an Online Safety Tool for Canadian Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence

23. April 2019 aktualisiert von: Marilyn Ford-Gilboe, Western University, Canada

Testing an Internet-based Safety Decision Aid for Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an interactive, online safety decision aid among diverse Canadian women who are experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV). The investigators will also explore how the online intervention works, and whether it has different effects for different groups of women.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

1 in 3 Canadian women experience IPV in their lifetimes. Over time, chronic stress of living in an abusive relationship has been shown to contribute to depression, anxiety and PTSD. Safety planning to reduce the risk of physical and emotional harm in abusive situations is one of the most widely recommended interventions for women in abusive relationship. However, fewer than 1 in 5 Canadian women access support from violence services to assist them in safety planning. Rural, Aboriginal, racialized, immigrant, sexual minority women and women who prioritize their privacy face particular barriers to accessing information and support for safety planning.

We adapted an interactive, online safety decision aid (SDA) recently developed and tested in the U.S. (Glass and colleagues, 2010) so that it applies to diverse groups of Canadian women, and extends the focus on emotional safety. The tool was revised based on a pilot testing for content and usability with 30 women (15 women who had experienced IPV and 15 service providers/experts). In this study, we test the effectiveness of this new tool, called "I CAN Plan 4 Safety" in a sample of 450 women from 3 provinces (ON, BC, New Brunswick). Women will be randomly assigned to complete either the personalized online safety decision aid (intervention) or an online tool which contains general risk and safety information (usual care control). Both tools are located on a confidential, password protected website. After initial completion of the online tools, they will be asked to login to the websites 3, 6 and 12 months later to complete standard outcome assessments. Women may access the information and resources in the online tools at any time for a 12 month period after they enrol in the study.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

462

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Kanada
        • University of British Columbia
    • New Brunswick
      • Fredericton, New Brunswick, Kanada, N5X 1V5
        • University of New Brunswick
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Kanada, N6A 3C1
        • Western University

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

19 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Weiblich

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • 19 years and older,
  • English-speaking,
  • Living in Ontario, New Brunswick, or British Columbia,
  • Reports current physical, sexual or emotional abuse in the context of coercive control from a current or former partner (boyfriend, girlfriend, husband, wife, or intimate/sexual partner)
  • Expresses comfort with and access to a safe computer with internet
  • Access to safe email and mailing address

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men
  • Under 19 years of age
  • Cannot read/speak English
  • Living outside of the 3 study sites
  • Uncomfortable using a computer or internet
  • No access to a safe computer with internet
  • No access to safe email and mailing address
  • Does not report current violence from an intimate partner

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Verhütung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Personalized online Safety Decision Aid
Setting priorities for safety; Danger Assessment; Personalized Action Plan
Participants rate the importance of 5 priorities to decision-making about their unsafe relationship by comparing the relative importance of each pair of priorities. Weights for each priority are computed and provided to the woman, along with examples of safety strategies that fit with her top ranked priority.
Participants complete a calendar to show episodes of physical and/or sexual violence they have experienced in the past 12, along with 20 questions assessing risk of serious or lethal violence. A standardized weighted score is provided, along with a brief explanation about her level of danger and appropriate actions she may take.
Women create a tailored action plan for themselves by selecting strategies from 8 different groups, including those which are recommended to them based on their responses to previous questions.
Aktiver Komparator: General Online Risk/Safety Information
General Risk and Safety Information; Basic Emergency Safety Plan
Participants receive general information about the importance of priorities in making safety decisions and risk factors for intimate partner violence.
Participants are provided with a basic emergency plan including information about local DV resources. The information is not personalized but is consistent with online information which women could find on their own (usual care)

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Changes in depressive symptoms on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Revised
Zeitfenster: baseline, 12 months
20 item self-report measure used to measure depressive symptoms in community samples and assess the probability of meeting criteria for major depressive disorder
baseline, 12 months
Changes in PTSD symptomology on the PTSD Checklist (Civilian Version)
Zeitfenster: baseline, 12 months
17 item self-report measure of PTSD symptoms designed for use in community samples and to assess probability of meeting DSM-IV diagnostic criterial for PTSD
baseline, 12 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Changes in Decisional Conflict on the low literacy version of the Decisional Conflict Scale
Zeitfenster: baseline, immediately post-intervention
The low literacy version of the Decisional Conflict Scale is an established, self-report measure developed by the Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group.
baseline, immediately post-intervention
Changes in use of safety strategies on a Safety Behavior Checklist
Zeitfenster: baseline, 6 months
self-report measure of use and helpfulness of strategies to deal with violence, adapted from Goodman et als (2003) Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index
baseline, 6 months
Changes in use of safety strategies on a Safety Behavior Checklist
Zeitfenster: baseline, 12 months
self-report measure of use and helpfulness of strategies to deal with violence, adapted from Goodman et als (2003) Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index
baseline, 12 months
Change in Mastery on Pearlin's Mastery Scale
Zeitfenster: baseline, 12 months
baseline, 12 months
changes in self-efficacy for safety planning on investigator developed scales
Zeitfenster: baseline, 6 months
2 self-report items which assess self-efficacy in making a safety plan for self and for children on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (range 0-100).
baseline, 6 months
changes in self-efficacy for safety planning on investigator developed scales
Zeitfenster: baseline, 12 months
2 self-report items which assess self-efficacy in making a safety plan for self and for children on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (range 0-100).
baseline, 12 months

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Severity of violence on the Composite Abuse Scale
Zeitfenster: baseline, 6, 12 months
30 item validated measure of severity of intimate partner violence
baseline, 6, 12 months
Social support on the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey
Zeitfenster: baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
5 item self-report measure of perceived social support, adapted by McCarrier et al (2011) from the MOS-SS scale
baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
Helpfulness of the online tool to decision making on the Preparation for Decision making scale
Zeitfenster: immediately post-intervention, 6, 12 months
10 item self-report measure of helpfulness of the online tool, adapted to IPV context by Glass et al (2010) from the standardized measure developed by the Ottawa Patient Decision Aids Research Group.
immediately post-intervention, 6, 12 months
Coercive control on the Women's Experiences of Battering Scale (WEB)
Zeitfenster: baseline, 3, 6, 12 months
10 item self-report measure of women's responses to partner violence which is a proxy for current level of coercive control
baseline, 3, 6, 12 months

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Oktober 2014

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Januar 2017

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. März 2017

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

2. Oktober 2014

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

7. Oktober 2014

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

8. Oktober 2014

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

24. April 2019

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

23. April 2019

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. April 2019

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • HSREB 105436

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Setting Priorities for Safety

3
Abonnieren