Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Evaluation of a Mobile Health Intervention to Improve Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes Among Kenyan Adolescents Living in Urban Informal Settlements

12 maja 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Winfred K. Luseno, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
This two-year study evaluates a mobile phone-based comprehensive sexuality education program designed to support adolescent sexual and reproductive health in Kenya, where rates of teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections remain high. The program, called AskDoki, delivers age-appropriate health information through the WhatsApp platform and is supported by trained youth peer leaders known as Digital Champions, who help adolescents access and use the program. Communities participating in the study are assigned either to receive the AskDoki program with Digital Champion support (intervention communities) or to not receive the program (comparison communities). Adolescents in both intervention and comparison communities complete surveys before the program begins and again six months after implementation of the AskDoki program. The surveys assess health knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and intended behaviors related to sexual and reproductive health. The study compares changes in survey responses over time between intervention and comparison communities to assess the program's effectiveness. It also evaluates how feasible it is to use Digital Champions to support adolescents' engagement with the mobile program and examines the cost-effectiveness of this approach.

Przegląd badań

Status

Jeszcze nie rekrutacja

Warunki

Interwencja / Leczenie

Szczegółowy opis

Despite recent improvements in adolescent sexual and reproductive health outcomes in Kenya, rates of unsafe sex, unintended pregnancy, abortion, and sexually transmitted infections remain high. School based comprehensive sexuality education has been shown to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health outcomes; however, implementation in Kenya is often limited by curriculum constraints and challenges faced by teachers, including limited time, training, and resources. As a result, many adolescents lack access to adequate sexuality education outside the formal school setting. Mobile health technology may offer a cost effective approach to delivering comprehensive sexuality education to adolescents. Amref Health Africa in Kenya developed and pilot tested a mobile, WhatsApp based artificial intelligence chatbot called AskDoki, designed to provide age appropriate comprehensive sexuality education. Preliminary findings suggested that pairing the digital curriculum with trained youth peer leaders-referred to as Digital Champions-may enhance reach, engagement, and effectiveness, particularly among adolescents with limited access to personal mobile devices. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), in collaboration with Amref Health Africa, is implementing AskDoki in urban informal settlements in Kenya using a community based approach. The study uses a quasi experimental design in which communities are assigned either to receive the AskDoki program supported by Digital Champions or to serve as comparison communities without access to the intervention. Adolescents aged 15 to 19 years complete surveys at baseline and six months after program implementation. The study evaluates changes over time in key determinants of sexual and reproductive health behaviors, including knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, self efficacy, and behavioral intentions, and compares outcomes between intervention and comparison communities. In addition, the study includes a process evaluation to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and implementation of the Digital Champion strategy. A cost effectiveness analysis is conducted to estimate the cost per adolescent reached and the cost per adolescent achieving improvements in key outcomes.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Szacowany)

610

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

  • Nazwa: Winfred (Winnie) K. Luseno, Ph.D.
  • Numer telefonu: 919-265-2618
  • E-mail: wluseno@pire.org

Lokalizacje studiów

  • Kenia
      • Nairobi, Kenia
        • Amref Health Africa in Kenya
        • Kontakt:
        • Główny śledczy:
          • Anne M. Gitimu, MPPM, MPH

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dziecko
  • Dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Tak

Opis

Adolescent participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • age 15-19
  • residing in one of the informal settlements participating in the study
  • not planning to relocate for 18 months
  • not currently married or living as married
  • comprehension of informed consent
  • willing to provide assent/consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • Age 14 and younger
  • Age 20 and older
  • Married/living as married
  • Planning to relocate within 18 months
  • Not residing in one of the informal settlements participating in the study
  • Unable to comprehend informed consent
  • Unwilling to provide assent/consent.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Zapobieganie
  • Przydział: Nielosowe
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Eksperymentalny: AskDoki plus Digital Champions
Intervention communities receive access to the AskDoki WhatsApp chatbot delivering comprehensive sexuality education, with support from trained youth peer leaders ("Digital Champions") who facilitate adolescent engagement with the program.
Produkt złożony: Chatbot providing comprehensive sexuality education plus youth peer facilitators
A chatbot designed to provide comprehensive sexuality education (named "AskDoki") to adolescents is deployed in a community targeted to receive the intervention along with peer facilitators. The facilitators are young adults (named "Digital Champions") who are trained to promote and facilitate access and use among adolescents of a chatbot.
Brak interwencji: No access to AskDoki or Digital Champions
Adolescents in comparison communities do not receive access to the AskDoki chatbot or support from Digital Champions during the study period.

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Self-efficacy to abstain
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' confidence in their ability to abstain from sex. Example item: "I can refuse sex when I don't feel like having sex." Five summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Sexual self-efficacy
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' confidence to negotiate and use condoms. Example item: "I can negotiate condom use with a potential partner". Eight summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Perceived advantages of delaying sex
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' perceptions about the advantages of delaying sex. Example item: "Waiting until I am older before I have sex will… Help me achieve my life's goals." Five summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Perceived disadvantages of delaying sex
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' perceptions about the disadvantages of delaying sex. Example item: "Waiting until I am older before I have sex will… Make me look old-fashioned." Four summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Attitudes towards condoms
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' perceptions about condom use. Example item: "It is OK to use condoms." Five summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Perceived norms of delaying sex
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' beliefs about perceived norms among people in one's life (friends, parents, other family, boyfriend/girlfriend) concerning delaying sex. Example item: "Most of my friends think that I should wait until I am older before I have sex." Four summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Subjective norms about condoms
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' beliefs about perceived norms among people in one's life (friends, parents, other family, boyfriend/girlfriend) concerning condoms. Example item: "My friends think that I should carry a condom." Four summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Intention to abstain from sex
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention

Change in respondents' intention to have sex within next month, 6 months, a year.

Example item: "I intend to have sex within the next month." Three items summed and averaged. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree). Responses are inversely coded to reflect intention to abstain from sex.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Intentions to use condoms
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' intention to use a condom during sexual intercourse. Single item: "I plan to use a condom when I have sexual intercourse." Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Sexual Behavior
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' sexual behavior. Example item: "Have you had vaginal sex with anyone in the past 6 months?" (yes/no). Three items to assess any sexual activity (i.e., anal, oral, and vaginal sex).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Frequency of sexual activity
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in how often respondents had sex in past month. Single item: "In the past month, how frequently did you have sex?" Five response options from "Zero times" to "More than four times a week."
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Condom use at last sex
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Condom used at last sex reported in survey. Single item: "Did you or your partner use a condom the last time your had sex?" (yes/no).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Condom use consistency
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Condom use frequency reported in survey. Single item: "In the past month, how frequently did you use a condom when having sex?" Five response options ("Never, none of the time" to "Always, every time").
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Knowledge about sexual and reproductive health
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Measures change in knowledge about sexually transmitted infections (STIs), sexual behavior, and pregnancy. Example item: "Can a person who looks strong and healthy be HIV positive?" (yes/no) Items will be summed and averaged.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Self-reported STI symptoms
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Respondents' self-reported STI symptoms. Example item: "Do you currently have any of the following symptoms?... Sore or lesions in your genital area or anus" (yes/no). Six items will be used to derive prevalence and distribution of STI symptoms.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Self-reported history of adolescent pregnancies
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Respondents' self-reported history of pregnancy and impregnating someone. Example item: "Are you or your partner currently pregnant?""
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Intention to test and treat STIs
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Two survey items assessing intentions to test and treat STIs. Example item: "I plan to visit a clinic to test for STIs if I have symptoms." Two summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to strongly agree). Items were newly created for this study.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Intention to use SRH services
Ramy czasowe: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Increase in intention to use SRH services. Single item: "I plan to visit a clinic for family planning services." Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to strongly agree). Item was newly created for this study.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Retention of Digital Champions
Ramy czasowe: Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period
Percent of Digital Champions retained (number retained at end of intervention period divided by total number hired) based on program administration records.
Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period

Inne miary wyników

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Acceptability of the Digital Champion strategy to promote/facilitate AskDoki access based on survey responses
Ramy czasowe: Immediately post-intervention
Average of 6 items about acceptability on post intervention survey. Example item: "Overall, how acceptable did you find the Digital Champions?" Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale. Items were adapted from a questionnaire based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.
Immediately post-intervention
Cost per adolescent served.
Ramy czasowe: Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period
Cost effectiveness is computed as the cost of intervention divided by the number of adolescents served. Program cost data will be obtained from labor costs of program and Digital Champion staff in addition to other AskDoki program costs.
Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period
Cost per adolescent who makes progress on outcome measures
Ramy czasowe: Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period
Cost per adolescent who makes progress on outcome measures. Cost effectiveness is computed as the cost of intervention divided by the number of positive outcomes. The cost effectiveness ratios we compute will depend on what outcomes increase significantly relative to the comparison group. Program cost data will be obtained from labor costs of program and Digital Champion staff in addition to other AskDoki program costs.
Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Sponsor

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

Współpracownicy

Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
Michigan State University
Amref Health Africa

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Winfred (Winnie) K. Luseno, Ph.D., Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Szacowany)

22 maja 2026

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

30 kwietnia 2027

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

30 kwietnia 2027

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

4 maja 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

12 maja 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

14 maja 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

14 maja 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

12 maja 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 maja 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Słowa kluczowe

Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • 1200
  • R21TW012623 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

TAK

Opis planu IPD

The study will share the clinical trial survey data.

Ramy czasowe udostępniania IPD

Data will be made available once analysis is completed or at the time of associated publication. The duration of preservation and sharing of the data will be a minimum of 5 years after the funding period.

Kryteria dostępu do udostępniania IPD

The data shared will be made available to researchers at other institutions only per PIRE Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and after the study is completed and primary findings are published. The rights and privacy of participants will be protected by: (a) IRB review and approval of data sharing activities and (b) releasing only de-identified data. De-identified data will include no information that could link it to individual participants. It is the policy of the PIRE IRB to not share data that are personally identifiable or could lead to disclosure of the identities of individual subjects. Moreover, we will not share data that could cause significant social or legal harm to research participants. Data will be shared for quantitative analyses of primary outcome measures. The dataset(s) that we share will be deposited in a repository such as openICPSR.

Typ informacji pomocniczych dotyczących udostępniania IPD

  • PROTOKÓŁ BADANIA
  • SOK ROŚLINNY
  • ICF

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Badania kliniczne na Interwencja mZdrowia

Wyszukaj podobne próby

Sponsorzy i współpracownicy

Warunki medyczne

Interwencje lekowe

CROs by country

CROs in Malawi

Warunki

Rzadkie choroby

Interwencje lekowe

Suplementy diety

Sponsor / Współpracownicy

Lokalizacje

Subskrybuj