Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Evaluation of a Mobile Health Intervention to Improve Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes Among Kenyan Adolescents Living in Urban Informal Settlements

12. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Winfred K. Luseno, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
This two-year study evaluates a mobile phone-based comprehensive sexuality education program designed to support adolescent sexual and reproductive health in Kenya, where rates of teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections remain high. The program, called AskDoki, delivers age-appropriate health information through the WhatsApp platform and is supported by trained youth peer leaders known as Digital Champions, who help adolescents access and use the program. Communities participating in the study are assigned either to receive the AskDoki program with Digital Champion support (intervention communities) or to not receive the program (comparison communities). Adolescents in both intervention and comparison communities complete surveys before the program begins and again six months after implementation of the AskDoki program. The surveys assess health knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and intended behaviors related to sexual and reproductive health. The study compares changes in survey responses over time between intervention and comparison communities to assess the program's effectiveness. It also evaluates how feasible it is to use Digital Champions to support adolescents' engagement with the mobile program and examines the cost-effectiveness of this approach.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Despite recent improvements in adolescent sexual and reproductive health outcomes in Kenya, rates of unsafe sex, unintended pregnancy, abortion, and sexually transmitted infections remain high. School based comprehensive sexuality education has been shown to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health outcomes; however, implementation in Kenya is often limited by curriculum constraints and challenges faced by teachers, including limited time, training, and resources. As a result, many adolescents lack access to adequate sexuality education outside the formal school setting. Mobile health technology may offer a cost effective approach to delivering comprehensive sexuality education to adolescents. Amref Health Africa in Kenya developed and pilot tested a mobile, WhatsApp based artificial intelligence chatbot called AskDoki, designed to provide age appropriate comprehensive sexuality education. Preliminary findings suggested that pairing the digital curriculum with trained youth peer leaders-referred to as Digital Champions-may enhance reach, engagement, and effectiveness, particularly among adolescents with limited access to personal mobile devices. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), in collaboration with Amref Health Africa, is implementing AskDoki in urban informal settlements in Kenya using a community based approach. The study uses a quasi experimental design in which communities are assigned either to receive the AskDoki program supported by Digital Champions or to serve as comparison communities without access to the intervention. Adolescents aged 15 to 19 years complete surveys at baseline and six months after program implementation. The study evaluates changes over time in key determinants of sexual and reproductive health behaviors, including knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, self efficacy, and behavioral intentions, and compares outcomes between intervention and comparison communities. In addition, the study includes a process evaluation to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and implementation of the Digital Champion strategy. A cost effectiveness analysis is conducted to estimate the cost per adolescent reached and the cost per adolescent achieving improvements in key outcomes.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

610

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

  • Name: Winfred (Winnie) K. Luseno, Ph.D.
  • Telefonnummer: 919-265-2618
  • E-Mail: wluseno@pire.org

Studienorte

  • Kenia
      • Nairobi, Kenia
        • Amref Health Africa in Kenya
        • Kontakt:
        • Hauptermittler:
          • Anne M. Gitimu, MPPM, MPH

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Kind
  • Erwachsene

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Adolescent participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • age 15-19
  • residing in one of the informal settlements participating in the study
  • not planning to relocate for 18 months
  • not currently married or living as married
  • comprehension of informed consent
  • willing to provide assent/consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • Age 14 and younger
  • Age 20 and older
  • Married/living as married
  • Planning to relocate within 18 months
  • Not residing in one of the informal settlements participating in the study
  • Unable to comprehend informed consent
  • Unwilling to provide assent/consent.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Verhütung
  • Zuteilung: Nicht randomisiert
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: AskDoki plus Digital Champions
Intervention communities receive access to the AskDoki WhatsApp chatbot delivering comprehensive sexuality education, with support from trained youth peer leaders ("Digital Champions") who facilitate adolescent engagement with the program.
Kombinationsprodukt: Chatbot providing comprehensive sexuality education plus youth peer facilitators
A chatbot designed to provide comprehensive sexuality education (named "AskDoki") to adolescents is deployed in a community targeted to receive the intervention along with peer facilitators. The facilitators are young adults (named "Digital Champions") who are trained to promote and facilitate access and use among adolescents of a chatbot.
Kein Eingriff: No access to AskDoki or Digital Champions
Adolescents in comparison communities do not receive access to the AskDoki chatbot or support from Digital Champions during the study period.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Self-efficacy to abstain
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' confidence in their ability to abstain from sex. Example item: "I can refuse sex when I don't feel like having sex." Five summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Sexual self-efficacy
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' confidence to negotiate and use condoms. Example item: "I can negotiate condom use with a potential partner". Eight summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Perceived advantages of delaying sex
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' perceptions about the advantages of delaying sex. Example item: "Waiting until I am older before I have sex will… Help me achieve my life's goals." Five summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Perceived disadvantages of delaying sex
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' perceptions about the disadvantages of delaying sex. Example item: "Waiting until I am older before I have sex will… Make me look old-fashioned." Four summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Attitudes towards condoms
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' perceptions about condom use. Example item: "It is OK to use condoms." Five summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Perceived norms of delaying sex
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' beliefs about perceived norms among people in one's life (friends, parents, other family, boyfriend/girlfriend) concerning delaying sex. Example item: "Most of my friends think that I should wait until I am older before I have sex." Four summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Subjective norms about condoms
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' beliefs about perceived norms among people in one's life (friends, parents, other family, boyfriend/girlfriend) concerning condoms. Example item: "My friends think that I should carry a condom." Four summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Intention to abstain from sex
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention

Change in respondents' intention to have sex within next month, 6 months, a year.

Example item: "I intend to have sex within the next month." Three items summed and averaged. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to Strongly agree). Responses are inversely coded to reflect intention to abstain from sex.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Intentions to use condoms
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' intention to use a condom during sexual intercourse. Single item: "I plan to use a condom when I have sexual intercourse." Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to strongly agree).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Sexual Behavior
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in respondents' sexual behavior. Example item: "Have you had vaginal sex with anyone in the past 6 months?" (yes/no). Three items to assess any sexual activity (i.e., anal, oral, and vaginal sex).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Frequency of sexual activity
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Change in how often respondents had sex in past month. Single item: "In the past month, how frequently did you have sex?" Five response options from "Zero times" to "More than four times a week."
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Condom use at last sex
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Condom used at last sex reported in survey. Single item: "Did you or your partner use a condom the last time your had sex?" (yes/no).
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Condom use consistency
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Condom use frequency reported in survey. Single item: "In the past month, how frequently did you use a condom when having sex?" Five response options ("Never, none of the time" to "Always, every time").
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Knowledge about sexual and reproductive health
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Measures change in knowledge about sexually transmitted infections (STIs), sexual behavior, and pregnancy. Example item: "Can a person who looks strong and healthy be HIV positive?" (yes/no) Items will be summed and averaged.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Self-reported STI symptoms
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Respondents' self-reported STI symptoms. Example item: "Do you currently have any of the following symptoms?... Sore or lesions in your genital area or anus" (yes/no). Six items will be used to derive prevalence and distribution of STI symptoms.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Self-reported history of adolescent pregnancies
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Respondents' self-reported history of pregnancy and impregnating someone. Example item: "Are you or your partner currently pregnant?""
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Intention to test and treat STIs
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Two survey items assessing intentions to test and treat STIs. Example item: "I plan to visit a clinic to test for STIs if I have symptoms." Two summed items. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to strongly agree). Items were newly created for this study.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Intention to use SRH services
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Increase in intention to use SRH services. Single item: "I plan to visit a clinic for family planning services." Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly disagree to strongly agree). Item was newly created for this study.
Baseline and 6 months post-intervention
Retention of Digital Champions
Zeitfenster: Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period
Percent of Digital Champions retained (number retained at end of intervention period divided by total number hired) based on program administration records.
Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Acceptability of the Digital Champion strategy to promote/facilitate AskDoki access based on survey responses
Zeitfenster: Immediately post-intervention
Average of 6 items about acceptability on post intervention survey. Example item: "Overall, how acceptable did you find the Digital Champions?" Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale. Items were adapted from a questionnaire based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.
Immediately post-intervention
Cost per adolescent served.
Zeitfenster: Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period
Cost effectiveness is computed as the cost of intervention divided by the number of adolescents served. Program cost data will be obtained from labor costs of program and Digital Champion staff in addition to other AskDoki program costs.
Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period
Cost per adolescent who makes progress on outcome measures
Zeitfenster: Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period
Cost per adolescent who makes progress on outcome measures. Cost effectiveness is computed as the cost of intervention divided by the number of positive outcomes. The cost effectiveness ratios we compute will depend on what outcomes increase significantly relative to the comparison group. Program cost data will be obtained from labor costs of program and Digital Champion staff in addition to other AskDoki program costs.
Start-up of intervention through six-month intervention period

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

Mitarbeiter

Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health
Michigan State University
Amref Health Africa

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Winfred (Winnie) K. Luseno, Ph.D., Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

22. Mai 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. April 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

30. April 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

4. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

12. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

14. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

14. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

12. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 1200
  • R21TW012623 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

The study will share the clinical trial survey data.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

Data will be made available once analysis is completed or at the time of associated publication. The duration of preservation and sharing of the data will be a minimum of 5 years after the funding period.

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

The data shared will be made available to researchers at other institutions only per PIRE Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and after the study is completed and primary findings are published. The rights and privacy of participants will be protected by: (a) IRB review and approval of data sharing activities and (b) releasing only de-identified data. De-identified data will include no information that could link it to individual participants. It is the policy of the PIRE IRB to not share data that are personally identifiable or could lead to disclosure of the identities of individual subjects. Moreover, we will not share data that could cause significant social or legal harm to research participants. Data will be shared for quantitative analyses of primary outcome measures. The dataset(s) that we share will be deposited in a repository such as openICPSR.

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ICF

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur mHealth-Intervention

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Angola

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren