Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Community Addiction Treatment

The main hypothesis being tested is that a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can improve treatment retention and outcomes for both posttraumatic stress and substance use disorders. The investigators have completed the Stage I Safety & Practicality Study, Feasibility Study and Pilot Randomized Controlled Study (comparing CBT for PTSD to versus a control condition) and for all studies found that CBT for PTSD was safe and effective in reducing PTSD symptoms, improving retention, and in reducing substance use. The present study proposes to continue testing the hypotheses by evaluating and comparing the PTSD, retention and substance use outcomes resulting from CBT versus a control condition and to treatment as usual. This is termed a "Stage II Efficacy Study" of behavioral therapy development and requires comparing the investigational treatment (CBT) with a control treatment, within the context of addiction treatment-as-usual (intensive outpatient programs). This is a larger randomized controlled trial in response to the outcomes of the pilot trial. The proposed research will evaluate the efficacy of a relatively simple, manual-guided cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for PTSD. CBT for PTSD has been designed and developed for delivery by counselors employed in community addiction treatment programs and offered in conjunction with standard community addiction treatment. Outpatients at each of 7 community addiction treatment programs, diagnosed with current PTSD will be randomly assigned to receive either: 1) CBT for PTSD in conjunction with standard treatment-as-usual (TAU) (n=76); 2) A manual-guided individual addiction counseling (IAC) adapted from the Individual Drug Counseling Manual in conjunction with TAU (n=76); or 3) TAU (n=76) without additional individual treatment for either PTSD or substance use disorders. Treatment will be delivered by frontline counselors from and onsite in the addiction treatment programs.

Our objective is to test the following specific hypotheses:

1. Patients exposed to CBT for PTSD plus treatment-as-usual (TAU) will show significantly greater improvements in PTSD symptom severity relative to patients in the other two interventions (IAC+TAU and TAU alone) at both the three-month and six-month follow-ups. The IAC+TAU condition will show no greater reduction in PTSD symptom severity than the TAU condition at both the three-month and six-month follow-ups.
2. Patients receiving the CBT for PTSD plus TAU will manifest equivalent reductions in substance use severity (drug and/or alcohol) to patients in the IAC+TAU intervention conditions at both the three-month and six-month follow-ups. CBT and IAC are both active treatments targeting substance use symptoms. The CBT+TAU and IAC+TAU condition patients will exhibit greater reductions in substance use than patients in the TAU condition at both the three-month and six-month follow-ups.
3. Patients in the CBT condition will have better retention in the addiction treatment program relative to the IAC+TAU and TAU alone intervention conditions. IAC+TAU will have better retention in the addiction treatment program than TAU alone.

This study involves a three-group repeated measure design. Within the NIDA stage model, it is a randomized controlled trial with a matched-attention control condition. The investigators plan to examine the outcomes associated with the intervention versus control condition versus treatment-as-usual among patients receiving outpatient addiction treatment services (intensive outpatient programs). The investigators will employ assessments at baseline, three-month follow-up, and six-month follow-up. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to the study CBT therapy (plus addiction treatment-as-usual), the matched attention control condition (individual addiction counseling [IAC] plus addiction treatment-as-usual) or the addiction treatment-as-usual, and all will be followed for the research assessments regardless of whether they drop out of treatment early (whenever possible).

Patients admitted to the participating addiction treatment programs are routinely screened for PTSD using a brief self-report survey, the PTSD checklist (PCL). These forms are collected by clinical staff of teh treatment program and scored for PTSD diagnostic criteria. Patients scoring 44 or greater on the PCL are approached by a clinic staff about potential interest in the study. If they wish to learn more about the study, research coordinator (or on-site employee) is contacted, a suitable time arranged, and the patient engaged in the process of informed consent.

If consent is granted, the subjects completes the baseline assessment. The baseline assessment consists of measures gathered via interview by a member of the research team, self-administered surveys completed directly by the subject, and review of the subject's medical record to extract demographic, substance use, and treatment history information, as well as chart diagnoses.

The interview portion of the assessment consists of:

• Standardized interviews designed to assess PTSD and other commonly associated axis I DSM-IV diagnoses: Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID).
• A urine screen and breathalyzer to test for alcohol and other drugs.
• Standardized follow-back method for gathering data on recent alcohol and drug use: Time-line Follow-back Calendar (TLFB).

The self-administered portion of the assessment consists of measures designed to assess:

• Alcohol and drug use, as well as associated problems in other life areas such as medical, employment, legal, social, and psychiatric: Addiction Severity Index (ASI)
• Treatment utilization: Recent Treatment Survey (RTS).

If the subject continues to meet criteria for PTDS (i.e. the CAPS interview confirms diagnosis of DSM-IV PTSD, with symptom severity at 44 or higher), he or she is randomized to receive the study CBT therapy, control condition (IAC), or treatment-as-usual (TAU).

Research assessments are then also conducted at three months and six months post baseline assessment. This follow-up assessments will consist of the same measures administered at baseline, with the exception of the SCID interview.

The investigators plan to randomize approximately 228 subjects in the study (76 to CBT, 76 to IAC, and 76 to TAU).