Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

MedDrive's Responsiveness to Alcohol (OH-MedDrive)

20 de abril de 2013 atualizado por: Bernard Favrat, MD, University of Lausanne

MedDrive's Responsiveness to Different Blood Alcohol Concentrations and Concurrent Validity Against Performances on a Driving Simulator; a Phase I, Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo, Dose Response Validation Trial

This four-way, dose-response, crossover, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomised validation study investigates the responsiveness of MedDrive, a computed battery of neuropsychological tasks, to different doses of alcohol.

The following hypothesis are tested:

  1. Measures from MedDrive are influenced by alcohol in a dose dependent way.
  2. Effects of alcohol on driving performances are correlated to measures from MedDrive in a dose dependent way.
  3. Within a group of healthy young drivers, MedDrive shows consistent results over repeated measures (ICC≥0.7).
  4. MedDrive models effects of alcohol on driving performances better than does the UFOV or the trial making task.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Descrição detalhada

Background: There is an increasing need for physicians to advice patients on their fitness to drive. Current guidelines underline the limitations of existing instruments and the poor adaptability of batteries of neuropsychological tests assessing fitness to drive in both experimental and primary care settings. The investigators therefore developed MedDrive, a free, reliable, computer based measuring instrument capable of detecting effects of age and drugs on cognitive functions considered as essential for driving.

Objectives: This study aims to test MedDrive responsiveness to different blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) and validate these measures against performances on a driving simulator. It also aims to measure MedDrive's reliability following repeated measures during the training phase, to compare MedDrive's performances in measuring effects of different BAC against the UFOV, and to model MedDrives measures to predict behaviour on the simulator. Finally, this study also includes a nested experimental study measuring effects of alcohol on attention.

Methods: Using Widmark's formula, 16 healthy young drivers are given cranberry juice with different doses of ethanol to bring their BAC to 0 g/L, 0.5 g/L, 0.65 g/L, and 0.8 g/L. They are blinded to the presence of ethanol by inhaling vapors of ethanol just before drinking. BAC is maintained during the entire experiment by using a breathalyser and administrating drinks throughout the experiment. Three scenarios are planned on a driving simulator (StSoftware PvW-2010), a road tracking task, a car following task, and a car following task including dual tasking using peripheral vision.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

21

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Geneva
      • Geneva 4, Geneva, Suíça, 1211
        • Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Geneva

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

20 anos a 40 anos (Adulto)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 20 to 40 years
  • Obtained drivers license at least 24 months before
  • Fit to drive
  • Consumed at least once six units of a beverage with alcohol at a single occasion during the previous six months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under the influence of a medicinal drug affecting their driving performance
  • Suffer from a psychiatric condition affecting driving performances
  • Suffer from simulator sickness
  • Presenting criteria (ICD-10) of alcohol dependence.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Intolerant to alcohol defined by having either headaches or digestive disorders for quantities of alcohol that do not seem to bother other people.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Diagnóstico
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Dobro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador de Placebo: Cranberry juice alone
500 mL of cranberry juice
100 mL cranberry juice is provided in a 250 ml container.
Experimental: BAC 0.5 g/L
Cranberry juice with ethanol to rise BAC to 0.5 g/L
100 mL cranberry juice is provided in a 250 ml container.
During a 45 min period, investigators will ask participants to drink 500ml of cranberry juice, 100 ml at a time each 5 minutes. Depending of the allocation, these drinks will contain more or less alcohol. Pure ethanol will be used mixed with the beverage. The amount of alcohol to dilute in the drink will be calculated using Widmarks formula. Participants will move to the simulator room 20 minutes after having finished drinking the first 500 ml. To maintain the BAC level, investigators will use a breathalyser and provide 100 ml cranberry juice every 20 minutes with the amount of necessary alcohol. The person administrating drinks will hand over the drinks and make sure the participants breaths in before taking a sip, thereby inhaling alcohol vapour from the lid and keeping them blinded to the content.
Experimental: BAC 0.65 g/L
Cranberry juice with ethanol to rise BAC to 0.65 g/L
100 mL cranberry juice is provided in a 250 ml container.
During a 45 min period, investigators will ask participants to drink 500ml of cranberry juice, 100 ml at a time each 5 minutes. Depending of the allocation, these drinks will contain more or less alcohol. Pure ethanol will be used mixed with the beverage. The amount of alcohol to dilute in the drink will be calculated using Widmarks formula. Participants will move to the simulator room 20 minutes after having finished drinking the first 500 ml. To maintain the BAC level, investigators will use a breathalyser and provide 100 ml cranberry juice every 20 minutes with the amount of necessary alcohol. The person administrating drinks will hand over the drinks and make sure the participants breaths in before taking a sip, thereby inhaling alcohol vapour from the lid and keeping them blinded to the content.
Experimental: BAC 0.8 g/L
Cranberry juice with ethanol to rise BAC to 0.8 g/L
100 mL cranberry juice is provided in a 250 ml container.
During a 45 min period, investigators will ask participants to drink 500ml of cranberry juice, 100 ml at a time each 5 minutes. Depending of the allocation, these drinks will contain more or less alcohol. Pure ethanol will be used mixed with the beverage. The amount of alcohol to dilute in the drink will be calculated using Widmarks formula. Participants will move to the simulator room 20 minutes after having finished drinking the first 500 ml. To maintain the BAC level, investigators will use a breathalyser and provide 100 ml cranberry juice every 20 minutes with the amount of necessary alcohol. The person administrating drinks will hand over the drinks and make sure the participants breaths in before taking a sip, thereby inhaling alcohol vapour from the lid and keeping them blinded to the content.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
central visual processing time
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the duration of exposure in ms for a 37.5% threshold for correct guesses adjusted for chance for central vision in the Visual Recognition Task (Task 1) in MedDrive.
1 hour post-intervention
peripheral visual processing time
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the duration of exposure in ms for a 43.8% threshold for correct guesses adjusted for chance for peripheral vision in the Visual Recognition Task (Task 1) in MedDrive.
1 hour post-intervention
dual task processing time
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the duration of exposure in ms for a 48.7% threshold for correct guesses adjusted for chance for simultaneous central and peripheral vision (dual tasking) in the Visual Recognition Task (Task 1) in MedDrive.
1 hour post-intervention
neutral response time
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the average response time in ms adjusted for learning effect for participants to respond to a peripheral stimuli during the Central Cue Attention Task (Task 2) in MedDrive.
1 hour post-intervention
conditioned alerting gain
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the average gain in response time (ms) over the neutral condition after participants are warned of the imminent exposure to a peripheral stimuli during the Central Cue Attention Task (Task 2) in MedDrive.
1 hour post-intervention
orientation gain
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the average gain in response time (ms) over the neutral condition after participants are shown where the peripheral stimuli is to show up during the Central Cue Attention Task (Task 2) in MedDrive.
1 hour post-intervention
attention shift response time
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the average response time in ms to detect the orientation of a given moving target during the Movement Detection Task (Task 3) in MedDrive.
1 hour post-intervention
distance to first cue
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the geometrical mean of distances in mm between the true location of the first cue and its indicated location during the Memory Decay of Spatial Resolution Task (Task 4) in MedDrive.
1 hour post-intervention
distance to last cue
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the geometrical mean of distances in mm between the true location of the last cue and its indicated location during the Memory Decay of Spatial Resolution Task (Task 4) in MedDrive.
1 hour post-intervention
spatial resolution decay
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Corresponds to the loss in precision for each extra cue shown during the Memory Decay of Spatial Resolution Task (Task 4) in MedDrive (ln(mm)/cue).
1 hour post-intervention

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Useful Field of View
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
The UFOV is a neuropsychological task which provides four outputs: visual processing, divided attention, selective attention, and overall risk
1 hour post-intervention
Trial Making Task
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
The duration of tasks TMT-A and TMT-B are provided in seconds
1 hour post-intervention
StSoftware driving simulator
Prazo: 1 hour post-intervention
Standard lateral deviation from the center of the road during the road tracking task, and gain and delay during the car following tasks
1 hour post-intervention

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Adverse events
Prazo: 1 week after intervention
New symptoms, accidents, hospitalisation are recorded one week after each visit.
1 week after intervention

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Bernard Favrat, MD, CHUV, University of Lausanne
  • Diretor de estudo: Patrice Mangin, MD, PhD, CHUV, University of Lausanne

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de fevereiro de 2013

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de abril de 2013

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de abril de 2013

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

28 de janeiro de 2013

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

29 de janeiro de 2013

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

31 de janeiro de 2013

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)

23 de abril de 2013

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

20 de abril de 2013

Última verificação

1 de abril de 2013

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • CE-12-277

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever