Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Effects of Exercise Intervention on Aging-related Motor Decline (EIAMD)

5 de fevereiro de 2020 atualizado por: VA Office of Research and Development

Effects of Exercise Intervention on Aging-related Motor Decline (AGING)

The purpose of this research study is to test whether differing levels of physical fitness affects patterns of motor dexterity and brain activity that have been shown to differ due to aging. Testing will take place at the Atlanta VA Medical Center and at Emory University.

Participants will be healthy adults within the target age range of 60-85 for the study. The study will require multiple visits over 15 months. There will be about 64 people volunteering for this study.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

The U.S. Census reports over 14 million U.S. Veterans (>63%) are beyond mid-life (>55 years). Declines in upper extremity motor performance respective of strength and dexterity are well documented within this age cohort). Recent cross-sectional research has discovered that aging related motor deficits may be influenced by a loss of interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) between primary motor cortices. However, this loss may not be an inevitable consequence of aging. Work from previous VA OAA Predoctoral and CDA-1 awards have shown that aerobic fitness may serve to mitigate losses in interhemispheric inhibition assessed by both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). That is, individuals who are aerobically fit show higher levels of IHI and improved dexterity and reaction times.

In light of new evidence from the investigators' lab's recent cross-sectional studies, physical activity over the long term (at least 2-5 years) may serve to alter levels of IHI and improve motor performance in the upper extremity. Aerobic exercise may provide a mechanism (reduced loss of interhemispheric inhibition) that could serve to improve motor function, but the neural mechanism responsible for such effects remains unclear. Previous investigations of interhemispheric communication and exercise have been limited by nature of inquiry, as cross-sectional research cannot measure changes over time in participants. As such, it is currently unknown how exercise may directly affect levels of interhemispheric communication and motor performance.

Behavioral interventions (motor strength and coordination) have been shown to be effective in improving upper extremity motor performance in older adults, however the duration of these gains appear to be short-lived. After as little as a few weeks of detraining, motor strength and coordination in the upper extremity rapidly begins to return to pre-intervention levels. Evidence from exercise interventions assessing gait and locomotion have shown that exercise programs over a longer term (>6 months) are associated with improved proprioception, fewer falls and better balance. However, the comparison of outcomes of upper extremity function in elderly adults respective of exercise duration remains largely unexplored. In addition to comparing the effects of short-term exercise (3 months) versus behavioral training (3 months) on upper extremity function, the current proposal will evaluate if a longer-term (6 months) exercise program can maintain or enhance upper extremity function and associated levels of interhemispheric inhibition.

The current study proposes the next logical step in my line of research and directly investigates the effects of exercise in an intervention with sedentary older Veterans (50-80 years), a group most likely to exhibit aging-related motor deficits. The investigators propose to enroll 40 Veterans into an upper extremity dexterity improvement program involving behavioral and exercise components. The behavioral intervention is a muscle coordination training previously shown to improve unimanual motor performance in older adults. The exercise intervention is a supervised group cycling regimen. The figure below shows the study design. Interhemispheric communication will be assessed with fMRI, and TMS.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

33

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Georgia
      • Decatur, Georgia, Estados Unidos, 30033
        • Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

60 anos a 85 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Living persons between 60 and 85 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unmanaged diabetes
  • participants completing vigorous exercise per week
  • participants whose profession requires vigorous physical labor
  • contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Ciência básica
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Stretching Exercise Intervention
A. Light stretching and balance exercises under supervised trainer. 3 times per week for 20-45 minutes. HR will be targeted to be under 50% of age-related maximum.
A. Light stretching and balance exercises under supervised trainer. 3 times per week for 20-45 minutes. HR will be targeted to be under 50% of age-related maximum.
Experimental: Aerobic Exercise Intervention
B. Interval aerobic cycling under supervised trainer. 3 times per week for 20-45 minutes. HR will be targeted between 50-85% of age-related maximum.
Supervised weekly exercise. 3 bouts of 45 minutes weekly on a cycle ergometer. HR will be kept at 75% of age-related maximum.
Experimental: Self Monitoring Intervention
C. 6 month self-monitored training phase during which time participants will exercise using a take home bike ergometer.
6 month self-monitored training phase during which time participants will exercise according to prescribed regimen (cycling)

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Estimate Cardiovascular Efficiency After Aerobic Exercise
Prazo: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Estimate of Volume of oxygen consumption (VO2peak) using YMCA protocol for cardiovascular assessment.
Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Estimate of Cardiovascular Efficiency After Balance Training
Prazo: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Estimated VO2peak using YMCA cycle test completed over nine to twelve minutes.
Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Silent Period Duration After Exercise Cycling Program
Prazo: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Duration of ipsilateral silent period from Transcranial magnetic stimulation measured in milliseconds
Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Silent Period Duration for Balance Group
Prazo: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Ipsilateral silent period duration as assessed by TMS
Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
fMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Aerobic Exercise
Prazo: Baseline to 24 Weeks with cross-over
Participants who exercise will evidence larger increases in interhemispheric inhibition as assessed by functional magnetic resonance measured by a z-normalized area under curve of right primary motor cortex. The area under the curve is an estimate of the fMRI hemodynamic response impulse response function. A higher number of AUC indicates less interhemispheric inhibition. In contrast, a lower number in this analysis indicates higher interhemispheric inhibition.
Baseline to 24 Weeks with cross-over
fMRI Interhemispheric Inhibition Improvement After Balance Training
Prazo: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Area under the curve of fMRI measures of right motor cortex BOLD profile will remain similar to pre measurements. The BOLD profile is the z-normalized area under the curve value of the fMRI impulse response function. A higher number indicates less interhemispheric inhibition.
Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Comparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Aerobic Exercise First Group After Home-based Intervention
Prazo: 24 and 48 weeks
Comparison of home based aerobic exercise intervention to assessments made after completion of crossover intervention in Participants receiving aerobic condition first. VO2peak estimation completed using the YMCA protocol investigating overall volume of oxygen consumption as a function of heart rate during work loads. Estimated VO2 peak values are in ml/kg(min).
24 and 48 weeks
Comparison of Cardiovascular Efficiency for Balance Exercise First Group After Home-based Intervention
Prazo: 24 and 48 weeks
VO2peak estimation completed using the YMCA protocol investigating overall volume of oxygen consumption as a function of heart rate during work loads.
24 and 48 weeks
Comparison of Silent Period Duration After Aerobic Exercise
Prazo: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Comparison of silent period duration at 24 weeks compared to baseline
Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks
Comparison of Silent Period Duration After Balance Exercise
Prazo: 24 and 48 weeks
Comparison of Home based training effects on TMS measures of silent period duration as compared to facility based exercise programs.
24 and 48 weeks

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Target Heart Rate Zone for Balance First Participants
Prazo: 24 and 48 weeks
Heart rate in aerobic target zone is measured in percentage of time in at least 50% of participants heart rate reserve.
24 and 48 weeks
Target Heart Rate Zone After Aerobic Exercise First
Prazo: 24 and 48 weeks
Targeted Heart Rate Zone among participants compared among short term exercise groups
24 and 48 weeks
Heart Rate Workload After Home Based Intervention
Prazo: 24 and 48 weeks

Measured heart rate after home based intervention

Technical implementation at the facility level prevented acquisition of these metrics until late in the project.

24 and 48 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Keith M. McGregor, PhD MS BA, Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur, GA

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

14 de janeiro de 2013

Conclusão Primária (Real)

7 de julho de 2018

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de agosto de 2019

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

5 de fevereiro de 2013

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

5 de fevereiro de 2013

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

8 de fevereiro de 2013

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

20 de fevereiro de 2020

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

5 de fevereiro de 2020

Última verificação

1 de fevereiro de 2020

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • E0956-W
  • 2012-060697 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: Veterans Affairs)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever