MANAGE AT WORK: Addressing the Challenge of Chronic Physical Health Conditions in the Workplace
1 de junho de 2017 atualizado por: Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety
MANAGE AT WORK: Evaluation of a Group-based Self-management Program to Address Workplace Discomfort and Fatigue Associated With Chronic Physical Health Conditions
The specific aim of the study is to evaluate the health benefits of a series of group workshops designed for workers with chronic physical health conditions.
The facilitated workshops apply principles of pain and illness self-management to help workers deal with health-related challenges while at work.
The workshops address issues of pain management, physical job demands, pacing of work, communication, problem solving, and coping.
Half of the participants in the study will be randomly assigned to attend workshop sessions (10 hours total), and all study participants will be followed for one year.
The primary hypothesis is that workers who participate in these workshops will show improvements in work engagement and reductions in work limitation in the subsequent 12 months.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
One significant trend in the US workforce is the advancing median age of workers and the growing prevalence of chronic medical conditions that contribute to workplace pain, fatigue, task limitations, and reduced productivity.
The proposed multi-site study is a randomized, controlled trial of a multi-session group intervention program targeting workers with chronic health concerns (N = 300).
The primary outcome measures will be self-report measures of work limitations and work engagement measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up.
Secondary outcomes will include turnover intention, sickness absence, job satisfaction, and healthcare utilization.
Process variables and covariates will include assessment of self-efficacy, work-related fatigue, emotional distress, work characteristics, general health status, and basic demographic variables.
The study should provide an assessment of whether principles of symptom self-management can be successfully applied to workplace problems and delivered in a group workshop format to reduce the disabling effects of chronic medical conditions.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
122
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Worcester, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos
- Employer #3 (confidential)
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Hanover, New Hampshire, Estados Unidos, 03755
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
-
Hanover, New Hampshire, Estados Unidos, 03755
- Employer #4 (Confidential)
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, Estados Unidos
- Employer #2 (confidential)
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Workers with at least one chronic physical condition (> 6 months).
- Working full time (at least 20 hours per week).
- Able to read and speak in English language.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Impending retirement or major career change (next 12 months).
- Not available to attend group workshops after working hours.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Self-management group workshops
Self-management group workshops: Participants randomized to the intervention arm will be asked to participate in group workshop sessions (10 hours total) led by a specially trained facilitator and provided over a span of approximately 2-3 months.
|
This intervention consists of multiple group workshop sessions (10 hours total) led by a specially trained facilitator and provided over a span of approximately 2-3 months.
The intervention incorporates standard elements of existing evidence-based pain and illness self-management efforts, but tailoring key messages and discussion elements to apply to workplace problems most relevant to workers with chronic medical conditions.
Each session is focused on different self-management strategies, with each session containing a mix of facilitator presentation, group discussion, case illustrations, role-play, completion of in-session self-assessments and activities, and brief homework assignments.
Approximately equal time is allocated to the topics of improving comfort, modifying work, communicating effectively, applying systematic problem-solving strategies, and dealing with negative thoughts and emotions.
|
|
Sem intervenção: No treament (wait-list control)
Wait-list control: Participants randomized to the control arm will receive no intervention during the one-year period of data collection, but they will be invited to attend a full-day Saturday workshop after all study data collection is complete).
The intent of the full-day workshop will be to provide the same self-management information as in the intervention arm, but on a delayed basis and in a more condensed format.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Work limitations
Prazo: One year
|
The Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ)(Lerner et al., 2003) is a 25-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the degree to which working individuals are experiencing limitations on-the-job due to their health problems and health-related productivity loss.
The WLQ asks respondents to rate their level of difficulty or ability to perform specific job demands.
Items are grouped into 4 scales: (1) time management; (2) physical demands; (3) mental-interpersonal demands; and (4) output demands.
|
One year
|
|
Work engagement
Prazo: One year
|
The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) (Demourati et al., 2001) is a 17-item self-report questionnaire that was designed to measure the degree to which employees have a sense of energetic and effective connection with their work activities (energy involvement) and see themselves as able to deal with the demands of their job (professional efficacy).
Respondents rate their level of agreement with stated feelings about work on a 7-point likert scale from "never" to "always".
Work engagement has been defined as a positive, fulfilling, work-related state of mind that is characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption.
|
One year
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Work fatigue
Prazo: One year
|
The Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery Scale (OFER) (Winwood et al., 2005) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the degree to which job activities produce acute fatigue, deplete available energy, and reduce the ability to engage in pleasurable activities outside of work.
Respondents rate their level of agreement on a 7-point likert scale from "completely disagree" to "completely agree".
|
One year
|
|
Turnover intention
Prazo: One year
|
A 4-item scale developed by Kelloway and colleagues (1999) will be used to assess turnover intentions.
The four questions are: "I am thinking about leaving this organization", "I am planning to look for a new job", "I intend to ask people about new job opportunities", and "I don't plan to be in this organization much longer".
Each item is rated on a 5-point likert scale from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".
|
One year
|
|
Job satisfaction
Prazo: One year
|
A 2-item scale developed from prior work by the researchers will be used to assess job satisfaction.
The two questions are: "I like working for this company and expect to be here for another year or more" and "I would recommend this company to others".
|
One year
|
|
Self-efficacy
Prazo: One year
|
A unique self-efficacy measure was developed for the project to be closely aligned with the content of the workshop program.
Ten items were adapted from the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (Nicholas, 2007) and ten items were taken from the Return-to-work Self Efficacy (RTWSE-19) scale (Shaw et al., 2011).
The goal of the new measure is to assess worker confidence with respect to symptom management, job modification, communication, emotional coping, and obtaining needed support and assistance.
|
One year
|
|
General health status
Prazo: One year
|
The Standard Form-36 (SF-36) (Ware et al., 1992) will be used to assess general health status.
This is the most well-validated and frequently used measure of generic health status in health research.
The SF-36 provides a single metric of health function regardless of diagnostic categories or illness classifications.
|
One year
|
|
Sickness absence
Prazo: One year
|
Participants will be asked to recall the number of days in the past 6 months that they were absent from work because of their health.
Self-report has been shown to be a viable and reasonably accurate method for assessing sickness absence days in studies of employee health (Short et al., 2009).
|
One year
|
|
Healthcare utilization
Prazo: One year
|
Participants will be asked to recall the number and type of health care visits over the past 6 months using a standardized set of reporting options and prompts.
Self-report has been shown to be a viable and reasonably accurate method for assessing health care utilization rates in studies of employee health (Short et al., 2009) and among individuals with chronic medical conditions (Lubeck & Hubert, 2005).
|
One year
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: William S Shaw, Ph.D., Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- Tveito TH, Shaw WS, Huang YH, Nicholas M, Wagner G. Managing pain in the workplace: a focus group study of challenges, strategies and what matters most to workers with low back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(24):2035-45. doi: 10.3109/09638281003797398. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
- Shaw WS, Tveito TH, Geehern-Lavoie M, Huang YH, Nicholas MK, Reme SE, Wagner G, Pransky G. Adapting principles of chronic pain self-management to the workplace. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(8):694-703. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.615372. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
- Shaw WS, Tveito TH, Boot CR. Introduction to the special section: sustainability of work with chronic health conditions. J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Jun;23(2):157-61. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9448-7.
- Shaw WS, McLellan RK, Besen E, Namazi S, Nicholas MK, Dugan AG, Tveito TH. A Worksite Self-management Program for Workers with Chronic Health Conditions Improves Worker Engagement and Retention, but not Workplace Function. J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Mar;32(1):77-86. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09983-6. Epub 2021 May 13.
- Shaw WS, Besen E, Pransky G, Boot CR, Nicholas MK, McLellan RK, Tveito TH. Manage at work: a randomized, controlled trial of a self-management group intervention to overcome workplace challenges associated with chronic physical health conditions. BMC Public Health. 2014 May 28;14:515. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-515.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
1 de novembro de 2013
Conclusão Primária (Real)
31 de maio de 2017
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
31 de maio de 2017
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
1 de novembro de 2013
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
6 de novembro de 2013
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
7 de novembro de 2013
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
2 de junho de 2017
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
1 de junho de 2017
Última verificação
1 de junho de 2017
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- LMRIS 11-08
- LMRIS Project 11-08 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
SIM
Descrição do plano IPD
De-identified data may be available to qualified researchers after data collection is complete
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .