One Month Daily Wear Clinical Evaluation of New Prototype Contact Lenses in Habitual and Neophyte Contact Lens Wearers
18 de junho de 2018 atualizado por: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
One Month Daily Wear Clinical Evaluation of Three Prototype Soft Contact Lenses in a Population of Habitual and Neophyte Contact Lens Wearers
There will be four study lenses tested; one marketed lens, and three prototype study lenses.
Subjects will be randomized to one of the four study lenses which will be worn in a daily wear modality, with a two week replacement.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
80
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Tamil Nadu
-
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, Índia, 600 006
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos a 39 anos (Adulto)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Sim
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subject must be between 18 and 39 years of age.
- The subject must be able to read and understand English.
- The subject read, understand, and sign the Statement of Informed Consent and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
- The subject must not have been a participant in a contact lens or contact lens solution study/investigation in the previous seven days.
- The subject must be willing to wearthe study lenses for at least 6 hours per day, 7 days per week (e.g. does not regularly swim).
- The subject must appear able and willing and able to the adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
- The subject's subjective refraction must result in a vertex corrected spherical contact lens prescription in the range of -1.00D to -4.00D in each eye.
- The subject's refractive astigamatism must be less than or equal to -1.00D in both eyes.
- The subjet must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/30 (6/9 or +0.20 logMAR) or better in each eye.
- The subject must require a visual correction in both eyes (no monofit or monovision allowed).
The subject must have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having:
- No amblyopia
- No evidence of lid abnormality or infection (including blepharitis/meibomitis)
- No conjunctival abnormality or infection.
- No clinically significant slit lamp findings (i.e. stromal edema, vascularization, corneal scaring, infiltrates or abnormal opacities).
- No other active ocular diseases.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear.
- Any systemic diseases, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear.
- Clinically significant (Grade 3 or 4) corneal edeam, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, or any other abnormalities of the cornea which would contraindicate contact lens wear.
- Any ocular infection.
- Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid permeable contact lens wear.
- Pregnancy or lactation (subjects who become pregnant during the study will be discontinued).
- No extended wear in the last 3 months.
- Diabetes.
- Infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
- Has had refractive surgery.
- Employee of VRF with direct involvement in the study or a family member of the clinic.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Dobro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: etafilcon A
Marketed control soft contact lens
|
worn in a daily wear modality; lenses will be replaced after 2 weeks
|
|
Experimental: Prototype E1
Investigational soft contact lens
|
worn in a daily wear modality; lenses will be replaced after 2 weeks
Outros nomes:
|
|
Experimental: Prototype E2
Investigational soft contact lens
|
worn in a daily wear modality; lenses will be replaced after 2 weeks
Outros nomes:
|
|
Experimental: Prototype E3
Investigational soft contact lens
|
worn in a daily wear modality; lenses will be replaced after 2 weeks
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Staining (Area)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Corneal Staining Area was collected at baseline and 4- week evaluations in both eyes using a slit lamp and was graded with a 11-point scale (i.e.
Grade 0= 0% of region covered, Grade 1 =10% of region covered, Grade 2 = 20% of region covered, Grade 3 = 30% of region covered, Grade 4= 40% of region covered, Grade 5 = 50% of region covered, Grade 6 = 60% of region covered,Grade 7 = 70% of region covered, Grade 8 = 80% of region covered, Grade 9 = 90% of region covered and Grade 10 = 100% of region covered).
Central, interior, nasal, temporal and superior locations were evaluated.
The average grade for each lens and time point was reported.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Corneal Staining (Depth)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Corneal Staining Depth was collected at baseline and 4- week evaluations in both eyes using a slit lamp and was graded with a 4-point scale (i.e.
Grade 0= None, Grade 1 =Superficial epithelial, Grade 2 = Full epithelial, Grade 3 =stromal glow).
Central, interior, nasal, temporal and superior locations were evaluated.
The average grade for each lens and time point was reported.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Corneal Staining (Type)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Corneal Staining was collected at baseline and 4- week evaluations in both eyes using a slit lamp and was graded with a 5-point scale (i.e.
Grade 0= None, Grade 1 =Micropunctate, Grade 2 = Macropunctate, Grade 3 = Coalesced Macropunctate and Grade 4 = Patch (greater or equal to 1mm).
Central, interior, nasal, temporal and superior locations were evaluated.
The average grade for each lens and time point was reported.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Limbal Conjunctival Redness
Prazo: Baseline and 2-Week Follow-up
|
Limbal Conjunctival Redness was assessed for each subject and eye at baseline and 2-week follow-up evaluations.
Limbal Redness was assessed in 4 regions Inferior, Nasal, Temporal and Superior and Graded using an Efron Grading scale for limbal redness in 0.5 unit increments (Grade 0:None, Grade 1:Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate and Grade 4: Severe).
The average Grade across all four regions can range from 0 to 16 where lower values indicate better performance.
The average Grade for each individual region can range from 0 to 4. The average grade across all regions was reported for each lens and time point.
|
Baseline and 2-Week Follow-up
|
|
Bulbar Conjunctival Redness
Prazo: Baseline and 2-Week Follow-up
|
Bulbar Conjunctival Redness was assessed for each subject and eye at baseline and 2-week follow-up evaluations.
Bulbar Redness was assessed in 4 regions Inferior, Nasal, Temporal and Superior and Graded using an Efron Grading scale for bulbar redness in 0.5 unit increments (Grade 0:None, Grade 1:Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate and Grade 4: Severe).
The average Grade across all four regions can range from 0 to 16 where lower values indicate better performance.
The average Grade for each individual region can range from 0 to 4. The average grade across all regions was reported for each lens and time point.
|
Baseline and 2-Week Follow-up
|
|
Visual Acuity (LogMAR)
Prazo: 4-Week Follow-up
|
Visual Acuity (LogMAR) was assessed bionocularly at the 4-week follow-up evaluations.
The average visual acuity (LogMAR) for each lens was reported.
|
4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Lens Fitting Characteristics
Prazo: Post Lens Fitting and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Lens fit was assessed for each subject eye at post lens fitting and 4- week follow-up evaluations.
Lens fit is a binary response as acceptable or unacceptable lens fit.
The percentage of eyes with acceptable lens fit was reported.
|
Post Lens Fitting and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Reported Ocular Symptoms (Burning/Stinging)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
The Ocular symptom Burning/Stinging was assessed by an individual item on a questionnaire and are subject reported, using the response scale of (N/A or Not recorded, Mild and rarely interferes with wear, Moderate and/or occasionally interferes with wear and Severe and/or frequently interferes with wear.
The percentage of Moderate or severe symptoms were reported for the initial visit as well as the 1 month follow-up.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Corneal Edema
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Corneal Edema was assessed using a bio-microscope at baseline and 4- week evaluations in both eyes and was graded with a 5-point scale (Grade 0= None, Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe).
The Percentage of eyes with Grade 3 or higher was reported.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Conjunctival Injection
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Conjunctival Injection was assessed using a bio-microscope at baseline and 4- week evaluations in both eyes and was graded with a 5-point scale (Grade 0= None, Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe).
The Percentage of eyes with Grade 3 or higher was reported.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Corneal Neovascularization
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Corneal Neovascularization was assessed using a bio-microscope at baseline and 4- week evaluations in both eyes and was graded with a 5-point scale (Grade 0= None, Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe).
The Percentage of eyes with Grade 3 or higher was reported.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Corneal Staining
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Corneal Staining was assessed using a bio-microscope at baseline and 4- week evaluations in both eyes and was graded with a 5-point scale (Grade 0= None, Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe).
The Percentage of eyes with Grade 3 or higher was reported.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Tarsal Abnormalities
Prazo: 1-, 2- and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Tarsal abnormalities were assessed using a biomicroscope at baseline, post lens fitting, 1-, 2- and 4- week evaluations in both eyes and was graded with a 5-point scale (Grade 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of abnormalities and 1 to 4 representing successively worse abnormalities (i.e.
Grade 0= None, Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe).
The percentage of eyes with Grade 3 or higher was reported.
|
1-, 2- and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Reported Ocular Symptoms (Cloudy/Blurry/Hazy)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
The Ocular symptom Cloudy/Blurry/Hazy was assessed by an individual item on a questionnaire and are subject reported, using the response scale of (N/A or Not recorded, Mild and rarely interferes with wear, Moderate and/or occasionally interferes with wear and Severe and/or frequently interferes with wear.
The percentage of Moderate or severe symptoms were reported for the initial visit as well as the 1 month follow-up.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Reported Ocular Symptoms (Dryness)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
The Ocular symptom Dryness was assessed by an individual item on a questionnaire and are subject reported, using the response scale of (N/A or Not recorded, Mild and rarely interferes with wear, Moderate and/or occasionally interferes with wear and Severe and/or frequently interferes with wear.
The percentage of Moderate or severe symptoms were reported for the initial visit as well as the 1 month follow-up.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Reported Ocular Symptoms (Grittiness/Foreign Body Sensation)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
The Ocular symptom Grittiness/Foreign Body Sensation was assessed by an individual item on a questionnaire and are subject reported, using the response scale of (N/A or Not recorded, Mild and rarely interferes with wear, Moderate and/or occasionally interferes with wear and Severe and/or frequently interferes with wear.
The percentage of Moderate or severe symptoms were reported for the initial visit as well as the 1 month follow-up.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Reported Ocular Symptoms (Irritation/Discomfort)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
The Ocular symptom Irritation/Discomfort was assessed by an individual item on a questionnaire and are subject reported, using the response scale of (N/A or Not recorded, Mild and rarely interferes with wear, Moderate and/or occasionally interferes with wear and Severe and/or frequently interferes with wear.
The percentage of Moderate or severe symptoms were reported for the initial visit as well as the 1 month follow-up.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Reported Ocular Symptoms (Itchiness/Scratchiness)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
The Ocular symptom Itchiness/Scratchiness was assessed by an individual item on a questionnaire and are subject reported, using the response scale of (N/A or Not recorded, Mild and rarely interferes with wear, Moderate and/or occasionally interferes with wear and Severe and/or frequently interferes with wear.
The percentage of Moderate or severe symptoms were reported for the initial visit as well as the 1 month follow-up.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Reported Ocular Symptoms (Lens Awareness)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
The Ocular symptom Lens awareness was assessed by an individual item on a questionnaire and are subject reported, using the response scale of (N/A or Not recorded, Mild and rarely interferes with wear, Moderate and/or occasionally interferes with wear and Severe and/or frequently interferes with wear.
The percentage of Moderate or severe symptoms were reported for the initial visit as well as the 1 month follow-up.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Reported Ocular Symptoms (Redness)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
The Ocular symptom Redness wasassessed by an individual item on a questionnaire and are subject reported, using the response scale of (N/A or Not recorded, Mild and rarely interferes with wear, Moderate and/or occasionally interferes with wear and Severe and/or frequently interferes with wear.
The percentage of Moderate or severe symptoms were reported for the initial visit as well as the 1 month follow-up.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Reported Ocular Symptoms (Variable Vision)
Prazo: Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
The Ocular symptom Variable Vision was assessed by an individual item on a questionnaire and are subject reported, using the response scale of (N/A or Not recorded, Mild and rarely interferes with wear, Moderate and/or occasionally interferes with wear and Severe and/or frequently interferes with wear.
The percentage of Moderate or severe symptoms were reported for the initial visit as well as the 1 month follow-up.
|
Baseline and 4-Week Follow-up
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
6 de fevereiro de 2014
Conclusão Primária (Real)
25 de junho de 2014
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
25 de junho de 2014
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
5 de março de 2014
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
6 de março de 2014
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
7 de março de 2014
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
19 de junho de 2018
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
18 de junho de 2018
Última verificação
1 de julho de 2017
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- CR-5146
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Sim
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Sim
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .