Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Infant Special Program for In Hospital Resuscitation Education in the Delivery Room (INSPIRE-D)

30 de setembro de 2016 atualizado por: Theresa Mariero Olasveengen, Oslo University Hospital

Infant Special Program for In Hospital Resuscitation Education in the Delivery Room - INSPIRE-D

The overall objective is to determine whether a bundled In-hospital Newborn Resuscitation Edu-cation intervention (INSPIRE-D) improves process of care associated with improved newborn survival and neurologic outcomes.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

This prospective interventional trial will be conducted in the delivery unit at OUS. The planned studies consist of five distinct phases with step-wise interventions; 1) baseline data collection, 2) introducing educational debriefing, 3) intensive run-in/rolling-refresher phase, 4) INSPIRE-D phase and lastly 5) evaluation phase.

Phase 1: The baseline data collection phase

  1. Needs assessment/questionnaires from participating healthcare providers will be collected which include demographic data such as sex, age, education, and work experience, as well as exposure to resuscitation training, simulation, self-perceived confidence and suggestions for further training/educational topics.
  2. Observations of the newborn in the resuscitation bays will be done by video recordings and supplemented by resuscitation records, hospital quality improvement data and medical records. Data points to be collected of the newborn are demographics, gestational age, physiological parameters such as heart rate and respirations/oxygenation, Apgar score, interventions performed, and outcomes during and at discharge from hospital.
  3. The healthcare providers adherence to guidelines in neonatal resuscitation (both technical and non-technical skills like team collaboration) will be evaluated by examining the video recordings and scored by validated scoring systems formerly tested with good intra- and inter-rater reliability. The scoring systems is adapted to guidelines from the Norwegian Council of Resuscitation and retested for intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Phase 2: Intervention Phase with Educational Debriefings

  1. Educational debriefings of healthcare providers involved in clinical situations with newborn resuscitation: Selected resuscitation events will be debriefed facilitated by a study team member with special competence in facilitation and an instructor in neonatal resuscitation. The debriefing will be held depending on clinical schedule and availability, to discuss process of care, performance, and provide education to multidisciplinary staff with advocacy/inquiry debriefing techniques.
  2. For healthcare providers; cont¬inued needs assessment and prospective observations by video-recordings in resuscitation bays to document quality of care.
  3. Baseline skills assessment will be collected using a novel manikin, the Newborn Lung Simulator. Healthcare providers will be presented for a mini-simulation with a compromised newborn and asked to perform high quality resuscitation. The performance and adherence to guidelines will be evaluated and retested after the intervention.

Phase 3 - Intensive run-in of high frequency training and team reflection: "The rolling refresher phase"

  1. In this phase training triggers are identified at the start of each day shift. A careful consideration of perinatal factors of both mother and infant will identify "high risk" deliveries with babies who may need resuscitation. If no risk deliveries are identified, a random Healthcare Provider team among the present staff will be selected.
  2. "Just-in-time" and "just-in-place" training; the novel "Rolling refresher", will be introduced (target >80% of staff) at the beginning of day shifts. Health Care Providers caring for labouring mothers with training triggers will be identified and exposed to "low dose" simulation-based "just-in-time" and "just-in-place" skills training. The short training session (<10 minutes) will take place on-site in the resuscitation bay with relevant topics such as; timely assessment of need for intervention, effective assisted ventilations on a Newborn Lung Simulator. We will use observations from the video-films to target training with focus on rapid evaluation of respiratory distress, correct ventilation technique and use of pulse oximetry.
  3. Continued simulation training will be based on problem areas identified from baseline. Performance during simulation training will be evaluated and registered.
  4. Educational debriefings will continue, as in Phase 2
  5. Continued needs assessment and prospective observations in resuscitation bays to document provider confidence, simulation performance and quality of care during implementation of the INSPIRE-D bundle described above.

Phase 4: Continued INSPIRE-D bundle. After successful implementation defined as >80% of staff having been through at least one "just-in-time and just in place" training session, all interventions above (phase 2 and 3) will continue on routine basis. Continued needs assessment of confidence and performance are repeated as described above.

Phase 5: Evaluation. Evaluation of the INSPIRE-D bundle to identify and define key factors and processes that we prove necessary to ensure timely and effective neonatal resuscitation associated with improved newly born survival and neurologic outcomes.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

435

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Oslo, Noruega, 0405
        • Oslo University Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho
  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates that require stabilisation and/or resuscitation such as ventilatory support, medications and/or chest compressions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent or health care provider reserved against study participation.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Pesquisa de serviços de saúde
  • Alocação: Não randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Sem intervenção: Control period
Assessment of resuscitation quality and clinical outcomes prior to educational intervention
Experimental: Educational intervention
Assessment of resuscitation quality and clinical outcomes after educational intervention consisting of debriefing and rolling refreshers.
Educational Debriefings and High frequency training and team reflection

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Quality of neonatal resuscitation (Validated performance score assessed by video analysis)
Prazo: 12 months
Validated performance score assessed by video analysis
12 months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Prazo
Clinical outcome - Time to effective respiration
Prazo: 12 months
12 months
Clinical outcome - Time to heart rate > 100
Prazo: 12 months
12 months
Clinical outcome - Admission to intensive care
Prazo: 12 months
12 months
Health care providers adherence to guidelines and behaviour markers - Self-reported score
Prazo: 12 months
12 months
Health care providers adherence to guidelines and behaviour markers - Simulation score
Prazo: 12 months
12 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Theresa M Olasveengen, MD PhD, Oslo University Hospital

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de janeiro de 2014

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de janeiro de 2015

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de maio de 2016

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

12 de janeiro de 2015

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

26 de janeiro de 2015

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

27 de janeiro de 2015

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)

3 de outubro de 2016

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

30 de setembro de 2016

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2016

Mais Informações

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever