The Cost Effectiveness of Endoscopic Ultrasound ( EUS ) Based Strategy in Diagnosis of Common Bile Duct Stones
The Cost Effectiveness Between EUS-based Strategy Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ( ERCP )-Based Strategy in Diagnosis of Common Bile Duct Stones in Patients With Intermediate Risk: a Study in Developing Country.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Background: Multiple reports showed the efficacy of EUS comparable to ERCP in the diagnosis of CBD stone. The EUS-based strategy has provided the cost saving in diagnosis of CBD stone in patients with intermediate risk in previous studies in western population. There were multiple parameters involved the cost effectiveness analysis included cost of ERCP, cost of EUS, prevalence of CBD stones, the sensitivity and specificity of EUS and the rate of complications related to EUS and ERCP. These parameter may vary from center to center and from region to region.
Aims: To assess the cost effectiveness of EUS based strategy versus ERCP based strategy in diagnosis of CBD stones in patients with intermediate risk in a developing country.
Method : A prospective study in 141 patients with suspected CBD stones based on clinical, biochemical and imaging by trans-abdominal ultrasonography or computed abdominal tomography. All patients underwent EUS. All patients with high risk for CBD stone underwent ERCP after the EUS. For patients with intermediate risk for CBD stone, ERCP's were done at the discretion of the attending physicians. For patients with ERCP done, the diagnosis of CBD stone was confirmed by ERCP demonstration of CBD stone. In patients with intermediate risk without ERCP done, clinical follow up to assess biliary symptoms and liver function test as surrogated markers for CBD stone at 3 months interval for one year were done. The false negative rate in patients with EUS and ERCP done in this study was used to estimate the false negative rate in patients in clinical surrogated group.
Definition: High risk of CBD stones was defined when CBD stone was detected by US/CT or dilated duct with abnormal liver function test ( LFT ). Intermediate risk of CBD stones was defined when US/CT showed normal bile duct with abnormal LFT or dilated duct with normal LFT.
Cost analysis :The cost of making diagnosis of CBD stone excluding all costs of treatment was analyzed. The cost of all patients with suspected CBD stones undergoing ERCP was calculated and compared with the strategy of EUS follow by ERCP. The cost was evaluated by (1) mean costs of EUS and ERCP based on the actual cost in our center which included costs of medical staffs, disposable materials, drugs, equipment amortization and maintenance. (2) cost associated with complications induced by the procedure.
Statistical analysis: Test performance of the endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis of CBD stones was analyzed with two by two tables. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Songkhla
-
Hatyai, Songkhla, Tailândia, 90110
- NKC Institues of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Songkla University
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- history of biliary pain or recent cholangitis
- acute pancreatitis
- abnormal liver function test
- dilatation of CBD and or CBD stone detected by trans-abdominal ultrasound and or computed tomography.
Exclusion Criteria:
- unstable hemodynamics
- severe coagulopathy
- refusal to participate
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
High risk group
High risk group was defined when CBD stones was detected by ultrasound ( US ) / computed tomography ( CT ) or dilated duct with abnormal LFT.
|
Patients with high risk underwent EUS examination under conscious sedation.
EUS was examined from second part of duodenum up to duodenal bulb.
All patients even if negative EUS examination of CBD stone were underwent ERCP in the same session.
The ERCPs were performed in standard manner.
All patients were contacted by phone on day 1, 3 and 30 after the procedure.
Outros nomes:
|
|
Intermediate risk group
Intermediate risk group was defined when US/CT showed normal bile duct with abnormal LFT or dilated duct with normal LFT.
|
Patients with intermediate risk underwent EUS examination under conscious sedation.
EUS was examined from second part of duodenum up to duodenal bulb.
ERCPs were done at the discretion of the attending physicians.
The ERCPs were performed in standard manner.
The patients without ERCP done were contacted at 3 months interval to assess symptoms and LFT for 12 months.
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
The cost of making diagnosis of CBD stone
Prazo: within 12 months after EUS
|
The cost of making diagnosis of CBD stone will be measured as the difference in the cost of all patients undergoing ERCP and ERCP follow by EUS intervention.
The cost was evaluated by (1) mean costs of EUS and ERCP based on the actual cost in our center which included costs of medical staffs, disposable materials, drugs, equipment amortization and maintenance.
(2) costs associated with complications induced by the procedure.
|
within 12 months after EUS
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
The accuracy of EUS in diagnosis of CBD stone
Prazo: within 12 months after EUS
|
This will be measured as proportion of patients who encounter a correctly diagnosis of CBD stone by EUS.
Positive EUS finding was confirmed by ERCP.
Negative EUS finding was confirmed by ERCP or absence of symptoms for 12 months.
|
within 12 months after EUS
|
|
The safety of EUS and ERCP procedure
Prazo: within 1 months
|
This will be measured as proportion of patients who encounter a procedural complication (%) during EUS and ERCP that includes pancreatitis, perforation or hemorrhage
|
within 1 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Diretor de estudo: Bancha Ovartlarnporn, MD, NKC Institue of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkla, Thailand.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- EC-55-066-21-1-2
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .