Telerehabilitation in the Home Versus Therapy In-Clinic for Patients With Stroke
Telerehabilitation in the Home Versus Therapy In-Clinic for Patients With Stroke An Assessor-blind, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Substantial evidence indicates that occupational and physical therapy improves outcomes after stroke, and that larger doses are associated with superior outcomes. However, many patients receive suboptimal doses of therapy for reasons that include cost, access, and difficulty with travel. This problem is likely to increase with time given the aging of the population and the increased rate with which patients survive stroke. Telehealth, defined as the delivery of health-related services and information via telecommunication technologies, has enormous potential to address this unmet need.
The current study will test the effectiveness of a novel home-based telehealth system designed to improve motor recovery and patient education after stroke. A total of 124 subjects (the number may be larger depending on the rate of subject dropout) with arm motor deficits 4-36 weeks after a stroke due to ischemia or to intracerebral hemorrhage will be randomized to receive 6 weeks of intensive arm motor therapy (a) in a traditional in-clinic setting or (b) via in-home telerehabilitation (rehabilitation services delivered to the subject's home via an internet-connected computer). The intensity, duration, and frequency of this therapy will be identical across the two groups, with subjects in both treatment arms receiving 36 sessions (18 supervised and 18 unsupervised), 80 minutes each (including a 10 minute break), over 6 weeks. The primary endpoint is within-subject change in the arm motor Fugl-Meyer (FM) score from the Baseline Visit to 30 Day Follow-Up Visit. Arm motor status is the focus here because it is commonly affected by stroke, is of central importance to many human functions, and is strongly linked to disability and well being after stroke.
Telerehabilitation will be evaluated using an assessor-blind, randomized, non-inferiority study design. This study seeks to establish comparable efficacy between the two treatment arms based upon a non-inferiority margin of 2.05 points on the arm motor Fugl-Meyer scale. Key study features include enrollment of a diverse stroke population, standardized and blinded outcomes assessment, a standardized treatment protocol, covariate-adaptive randomization, and use of an active comparator that is matched for duration, frequency, and intensity of therapy. The FDA has determined that this investigation is a non-significant risk device study.
A minimum of 5 clinical sites will participate in this study. Each clinical site will conduct all testing and treatment at a single central site, although each clinical site is encouraged to recruit subjects from their referral hospitals. At the central study site, an Assessment Therapist will perform all study testing, blinded to treatment assignment (the subject by necessity is not blinded), while a Treatment Therapist will provide in-clinic therapy as well as direct home-based telerehabilitation. Potential enrollees may be identified through any of several routes, for example, during the acute stroke admission at the clinical site or a referral hospital, during inpatient rehabilitation at the clinical site or a referral hospital, or through other means of community-based recruitment. Study conduct will be highly standardized, including selecting therapy content, delivering therapy, and testing.
The current study aims to critically evaluate the utility of a telehealth approach to motor therapy and stroke education. Telehealth has enormous potential to address unmet needs in the growing population of stroke survivors.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Fase 1
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
California
-
Irvine, California, Estados Unidos, 92697
- University of California, Irvine
-
San Diego, California, Estados Unidos, 92103
- UCSD Stroke Center
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, Estados Unidos, 32216
- Brooks Rehabilitation Clinical Research Center
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, Estados Unidos, 30322
- Emory Rehabilitation Hospital
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 60611
- Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Charlestown, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02129
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
-
-
New Jersey
-
Saddle Brook, New Jersey, Estados Unidos, 07663
- Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10029
- Mount Sinai
-
White Plains, New York, Estados Unidos, 10605
- Burke Rehabilitation Hospital
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 44109
- MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute of Ohio
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, Estados Unidos, 29425
- MUSC Center for Rehabilitation Research in Neurological Conditions
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos, 98104
- Harborview Medical Center
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion criteria
- Age ≥18 years at the time of randomization
- Stroke that is radiologically verified, due to ischemia or to intracerebral hemorrhage, and with time of stroke onset 4-36 weeks prior to randomization
- Arm motor FM score of 22-56 (out of 66) at both the Screening Visit and Baseline Visit
- Box & Block Test score with affected arm is at least 3 blocks in 60 seconds at the Screening Visit
- Informed consent signed by the subject
- Behavioral contract signed by the subject
Exclusion criteria
- A major, active, coexistent neurological or psychiatric disease, including alcoholism or dementia
- A diagnosis (apart from the index stroke) that substantially affects paretic arm function
- A major medical disorder that substantially reduces the likelihood that a subject will be able to comply with all study procedures
- Severe depression, defined as GDS Score >10
- Significant cognitive impairment, defined as Montreal Cognitive Assessment score < 22
- Deficits in communication that interfere with reasonable study participation
- A new symptomatic stroke has occurred since the index stroke that occurred 4-36 weeks prior to randomization
- Lacking visual acuity, with or without corrective lens, of 20/40 or better in at least one eye
- Life expectancy < 6 months
- Pregnant
- Receipt of Botox to arms, legs, or trunk in the preceding 6 months, or expectation that Botox will be administered to the arm, leg, or trunk prior to completion of the 30 Day Follow Up Visit
- Unable to successfully perform all 3 of the rehabilitation exercise test examples
- Unable or unwilling to perform study procedures/therapy, or expectation of non-compliance with study procedures/therapy
- Concurrent enrollment in another investigational study
- Non-English speaking, such that subject does not speak sufficient English to comply with study procedures
- Expectation that subject cannot participate in study visits
Expectation that subject will not have a single domicile address during the 6 weeks of therapy, within 25 miles of the central study site and with Verizon wireless reception.**
- A site may enroll a person who does not meet exclusion criterion # 17 if this is specifically approved by the site's study PI.
- Because Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores may be difficult to interpret for patients with aphasia, at the discretion of the site's study PI, exclusion criterion #5 ("MoCA score cannot be <22") can be waived.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Telerehabilitation Therapy
The Telerehabilitation arm of this study will deliver rehabilitation treatment sessions via an in-home internet-connected computer.
A major component of the system is the use of games to promote therapeutically relevant movements.
The subject will perform daily assigned home-based telerehabilitation games and exercises and 5 minutes of stroke education, all guided by the telerehabilitation system.During half of the sessions, therapists will initiate a videoconference with the subject's telerehabilitation system to discuss progress, issues, and revise treatment plans as needed.
|
18 days of supervised sessions via videoconference and 18 days of unsupervised sessions.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: In-Clinic Therapy
The in-clinic arm of this study will deliver half of the rehabilitation treatment sessions at a study site providing traditional outpatient therapy, continuously supervised by a licensed therapist.
The unsupervised therapy sessions will take place in the patient's home, and will be guided by an individualized booklet generated and printed by the Treatment Therapist and distributed to the subject during the first in-clinic therapy visit.
The content of the unsupervised therapy sessions will be matched to the same exercise and training components provided during the subject's in-clinic supervised therapy sessions.
In addition, at the start of each of the unsupervised sessions, all subjects will receive 5 minutes of stroke education.
|
18 days of therapist supervised sessions and 18 days of unsupervised in home sessions.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Arm Motor Fugl-Meyer Score From Baseline to 30 Days Post-therapy
Prazo: from the Baseline Visit to the 30 Day Follow Up Visit
|
The full name of this scale is the arm motor Fugl-Meyer scale.
it measures arm motor impairment, which is in the body structure/function domain.
It consists of 33 individual assessments that are summed to generate a total arm motor Fugl-Meyer score.
Scores range from 0-66, which higher values being better (and so 66 being normal).
There are no subscores evaluated.
|
from the Baseline Visit to the 30 Day Follow Up Visit
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Aug;8(8):741-54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
- Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Feb;51(1):S225-39. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018).
- Cramer SC, Sur M, Dobkin BH, O'Brien C, Sanger TD, Trojanowski JQ, Rumsey JM, Hicks R, Cameron J, Chen D, Chen WG, Cohen LG, deCharms C, Duffy CJ, Eden GF, Fetz EE, Filart R, Freund M, Grant SJ, Haber S, Kalivas PW, Kolb B, Kramer AF, Lynch M, Mayberg HS, McQuillen PS, Nitkin R, Pascual-Leone A, Reuter-Lorenz P, Schiff N, Sharma A, Shekim L, Stryker M, Sullivan EV, Vinogradov S. Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain. 2011 Jun;134(Pt 6):1591-609. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr039. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
- Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999 Jul 17;354(9174):191-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09477-X.
- Brennan DM, Tindall L, Theodoros D, Brown J, Campbell M, Christiana D, Smith D, Cason J, Lee A; American Telemedicine Association. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines--October 2010. Telemed J E Health. 2011 Oct;17(8):662-5. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0036. Epub 2011 Jul 26. No abstract available.
- Cramer SC, Le V, Saver JL, Dodakian L, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, Zhou RJ, Chiu NL, Heckhausen J, Cassidy JM, Scacchi W, Smith MT, Barrett AM, Knutson J, Edwards D, Putrino D, Agrawal K, Ngo K, Roth EJ, Tirschwell DL, Woodbury ML, Zafonte R, Zhao W, Spilker J, Wolf SL, Broderick JP, Janis S. Intense Arm Rehabilitation Therapy Improves the Modified Rankin Scale Score: Association Between Gains in Impairment and Function. Neurology. 2021 Apr 6;96(14):e1812-e1822. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011667. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
- Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, Zhou RJ, Chiu NL, Heckhausen J, Cassidy JM, Scacchi W, Smith MT, Barrett AM, Knutson J, Edwards D, Putrino D, Agrawal K, Ngo K, Roth EJ, Tirschwell DL, Woodbury ML, Zafonte R, Zhao W, Spilker J, Wolf SL, Broderick JP, Janis S; National Institutes of Health StrokeNet Telerehab Investigators. Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 1U01NS091951-01A1 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA)
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .