Integrated Smoking Cessation Treatment for Smokers With Serious Mental Illness
16 de fevereiro de 2022 atualizado por: A. Eden Evins, Massachusetts General Hospital
The overall aim of this study is to test the effect of academic detailing (i.e.
provider-level educational intervention focused on evidence-based smoking cessation treatment for those with psychiatric illness) and community health worker (CHW) support on the provision and utilization of standard of care smoking cessation treatment to those with serious mental illness (SMI) and smoking cessation rates for adults with SMI who smoke.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
In this study, the investigators aim to test whether a provider-level educational intervention in the form of targeted, practical, action-oriented education to primary care physicians and nurses on safety and effectiveness of and how to use evidence-based smoking cessation treatment for those with psychiatric illness, termed academic detailing (AD), and practical support offered to the primary care physician / primary care team and the smoker with SMI in the form of a community health worker (CHW) will improve recommendation and utilization of standard of care smoking cessation treatments to and by those with SMI and, if so, whether the intervention improves smoking cessation rates for adults with SMI who smoke.
To do so, the investigators will enroll approximately 1300 adult smokers with SMI who receive psychiatric rehabilitation services, Community Based Flexible Support (CBFS) or Assertive Community Treatment (ACT)), from the two largest providers of these services in the Boston area. Primary care clinics that serve 3 or more enrolled participants will be cluster randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either receive AD for their clinical staff or treatment as usual (TAU) in a cluster randomized design. Smokers with SMI in the study who receive primary care at the clinics assigned to the AD intervention to providers will be randomly assigned at the individual level in a 1:1 ratio to be offered CHW support in addition to their ongoing psychiatric rehabilitation (CBFS or ACT) services. This was the original design for the study and these participants comprise Cohort 1. The protocol was modified and approved by the sponsor in February 2018 to include a second cohort. Because 155 enrolled participants received primary care in 155 clinics that served only 1-2 participants, and it was beyond the scope of the trial to deliver AD to so many clinics, a second cohort was formed in which these 155 participants were randomly assigned at the individual level in a 1:1 ratio to CHW or TAU.
This study was also modified by receipt of a qualitative supplement award from the sponsor to conduct mixed methods research to identify and define barriers and facilitators to implementation of components of the integrated care intervention in primary care clinical settings using an interactive convergent mixed-methods design. The aim of this portion of the study is to better understand the factors that impact the integration of Integrated Care and evidence-based treatments for smoking cessation for those with SMI in primary care settings. Qualitative interviews will be conducted for enrolled participants, CHWs, primary care physician, and stakeholders.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
1165
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02114
- Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Dept. of Psychiatry
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion:
- adult (18+ years)
- current smoker
- current diagnosis of SMI (e.g. schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, etc...)
- currently receiving psychiatric rehabilitation services through CBFS and ACT programs at Bay Cove Human Services and Vinfen Corporation
Exclusion:
- intellectual disability (IQ<70)
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: Treatment as Usual (TAU) - Cohort 1
Usual care (TAU) for adults with SMI in Massachusetts consists of rehabilitation services publicly funded by the state and traditional fee for service outpatient medical and psychiatric care.
Importantly, medical care is not programmatically integrated with the psychiatric rehabilitation services.
Participants in this arm will receive no other study-related intervention.Cohort 1 (AD-eligible) comprised participants seen in primary care clinics serving ≥3 enrolled participants.
|
Usual care (TAU) for adults with SMI in Massachusetts consists of rehabilitation services publicly funded by the state and traditional fee for service outpatient medical and psychiatric care.
Importantly, medical care is not programmatically integrated with the psychiatric rehabilitation services.
|
|
Experimental: AD + CHW - Cohort 1
Academic detailing (AD) is a targeted continuing medical education (CME) strategy that adapts social marketing techniques, using mixed interactive and didactic formats in individual and group settings integrated into the practice setting to promote beneficial changes in medical care. The aim of AD is to help clinicians understand and adopt targeted evidence-based practices. Community Health Worker (CHW) will offer to support patients and prescribers to implement smoking cessation treatments that may be requested by patients and/or recommended by prescribers. |
Academic detailing (AD) is a targeted continuing medical education (CME) strategy that adapts social marketing techniques, using mixed interactive and didactic formats in individual and group settings integrated into the practice setting to promote beneficial changes in medical care.
AD helps clinicians understand and adopt targeted evidence-based practices and is one of the few Continuing Medical Education (CME) interventions that has consistently demonstrated improved alignment of physician prescribing behavior with evidence-based practice.
Community Health Worker (CHW) The CHW will offer to support patients and prescribers in health promotion and preventive care in general and specifically to support communication between the primary care provider and patient regarding smoking status, smoking cessation, and to aid implementation of any smoking cessation treatments recommended by prescribers.
CHWs will complete the standard CHW certificate training program in general preventive medicine, available through the Boston Public Health Commission.
CHWs will then receive the additional specialized training.
|
|
Experimental: AD - Cohort 1
Participant in this arm will have Academic Detailing offered to their primary care clinical staff as described above.
Participants who are randomized to this condition will not be offered Community Health Worker support.
|
Academic detailing (AD) is a targeted continuing medical education (CME) strategy that adapts social marketing techniques, using mixed interactive and didactic formats in individual and group settings integrated into the practice setting to promote beneficial changes in medical care.
AD helps clinicians understand and adopt targeted evidence-based practices and is one of the few Continuing Medical Education (CME) interventions that has consistently demonstrated improved alignment of physician prescribing behavior with evidence-based practice.
|
|
Experimental: CHW - Cohort 2
Community Health Worker (CHW) will offer to support patients and prescribers to implement smoking cessation treatments that may be requested by patients and/or recommended by prescribers.
|
Community Health Worker (CHW) The CHW will offer to support patients and prescribers in health promotion and preventive care in general and specifically to support communication between the primary care provider and patient regarding smoking status, smoking cessation, and to aid implementation of any smoking cessation treatments recommended by prescribers.
CHWs will complete the standard CHW certificate training program in general preventive medicine, available through the Boston Public Health Commission.
CHWs will then receive the additional specialized training.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Treatment as Usual (TAU) - Cohort 2
Usual care (TAU) for adults with SMI in Massachusetts consists of rehabilitation services publicly funded by the state and traditional fee for service outpatient medical and psychiatric care.
Importantly, medical care is not programmatically integrated with the psychiatric rehabilitation services.
Participants in this arm will receive no other study-related intervention.
Cohort 2 (AD-ineligible) comprised participants whose primary care clinic served ≤2 enrolled participants
|
Usual care (TAU) for adults with SMI in Massachusetts consists of rehabilitation services publicly funded by the state and traditional fee for service outpatient medical and psychiatric care.
Importantly, medical care is not programmatically integrated with the psychiatric rehabilitation services.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Are Abstinent at the Intervention Year 2 Assessment in Cohort 1
Prazo: Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Three pairwise comparisons between usual care (TAU), AD+CHW, and AD for number of participants who are abstinent (defined as 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence confirmed with an expired CO of 5 ppm or less) at the intervention year 2 assessment.
The investigators hypothesize that (1) those who receive AD+CHW will demonstrate higher rates of tobacco abstinence than those who receive TAU, (2) those who receive AD will demonstrate higher rates of tobacco abstinence than those who received TAU, and (3) those who receive AD+CHW will demonstrate higher rates of tobacco abstinence than those who received AD.
|
Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Use of Any First Line, Evidence-based TUD Medication at the Intervention Year 1 or 2 Assessment in Cohort 1
Prazo: Any use over assessments for years 1 or 2 of intervention
|
Two comparisons, usual care (TAU) versus AD+CHW and TAU versus AD, for use of any first line, evidence-based TUD medication during assessments for years 1 and 2 of the intervention.
The investigators hypothesize that (1) those who receive AD+CHW will demonstrate higher rates of medication use than those who received TAU, and (2) those who receive AD will demonstrate higher rates of medication use than those who received TAU.
|
Any use over assessments for years 1 or 2 of intervention
|
|
Number of Participants Who Use Varenicline at the Intervention Year 1 or 2 Assessment in Cohort 1
Prazo: Any use over assessments for years 1 or 2 of intervention
|
Two comparisons, usual care (TAU) versus AD+CHW and TAU versus AD, for use of varenicline during assessments for years 1 and 2 of the intervention.
The investigators hypothesize that (1) those who receive AD+CHW will demonstrate higher rates of varenicline use than those who received TAU, and (2) those who receive AD will demonstrate higher rates of varenicline use than those who received TAU.
|
Any use over assessments for years 1 or 2 of intervention
|
|
Effect of Use of Any TUD Medication on Number of Participants Who Are Abstinence at the Intervention Year 2 Assessment in Cohort 1
Prazo: Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Effect of use of any first line, evidence-based TUD medication during assessments for years 1 and 2 of the intervention on number of participants who are abstinent (defined as 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence confirmed with an expired CO of 5 ppm or less) at the intervention year 2 assessment.
The investigators hypothesize that those who used any medication will exhibit higher rates of tobacco abstinence than those who did not use any medications.
The indirect effect of AD+CHW and AD interventions on abstinence rates with any TUD medication use as a mediator will be also be assessed.
|
Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
|
Effect of Varenicline Use on Number of Participants Who Are Abstinence at the Intervention Year 2 Assessment in Cohort 1
Prazo: Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Effect of use of varenicline during assessments for years 1 and 2 of the intervention on number of participants who are abstinent (defined as 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence confirmed with an expired CO of 5 ppm or less) at the intervention year 2 assessment.
The investigators hypothesize that those who used varenicline will exhibit higher rates of tobacco abstinence than those who did not use any varenicline.
The indirect effect of AD+CHW and AD interventions on abstinence rates with any TUD medication use as a mediator will be also be assessed.
|
Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
|
Number of Participants Who Are Abstinent at the Intervention Year 2 Assessment in Cohorts 1 and 2
Prazo: Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Comparisons between (1) CHW (pooled over AD+CHW and CHW) and (2) AD (pooled over AD+CHW and AD) compared to usual care (TAU) on number of participants who are abstinent (defined as 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence confirmed with an expired CO of 5 ppm or less) at the intervention year 2 assessment.
The investigators hypothesize that (1) those who receive CHW support will demonstrate higher rates of tobacco abstinence than those who receive TAU, and (2) those with AD exposure will demonstrate higher rates of tobacco abstinence than those who received TAU.
To make use of all the data, hypotheses will be assessed in Cohorts 1 and 2 via analysis of a factorial design.
|
Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
|
Number of Participants Who Use of Any First Line, Evidence-based TUD Medication at the Intervention Year 1 or 2 Assessment in Cohorts 1 and 2
Prazo: Any use over assessments for years 1 or 2 of intervention
|
Effects of CHW (pooled over AD+CHW and CHW) and AD (pooled over AD+CHW and AD) compared to usual care (TAU) on number of participants who use of any first line, evidence-based TUD medication during assessments for years 1 and 2 of the intervention.
The investigators hypothesize that (1) those who receive CHW support will demonstrate higher rates of medication use than those who receive TAU, and (2) those with AD exposure will demonstrate higher rates of medication use than those who received TAU.
To make use of all the data, hypotheses will be assessed in Cohorts 1 and 2 via analysis of a factorial design.
|
Any use over assessments for years 1 or 2 of intervention
|
|
Number of Participants Who Use Varenicline at the Intervention Year 1 or 2 Assessments in Cohorts 1 and 2
Prazo: Any use over assessments for years 1 or 2 of intervention
|
Effects of CHW (pooled over AD+CHW and CHW) and AD (pooled over AD+CHW and AD) compared to usual care (TAU) on number of participants who use varenicline during assessments for years 1 and 2 of the intervention.
The investigators hypothesize that (1) those who receive CHW support will demonstrate higher rates of varenicline use than those who receive TAU, and (2) those with AD exposure will demonstrate higher rates of varenicline use than those who received TAU.
To make use of all the data, hypotheses will be assessed in Cohorts 1 and 2 via analysis of a factorial design.
|
Any use over assessments for years 1 or 2 of intervention
|
|
Effect of Use of Any TUD Medication on Number of Participants Who Are Abstinence at the Intervention Year 2 Assessment in Cohorts 1 and 2
Prazo: Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Effect of use of any first line, evidence-based TUD medication during assessments for years 1 and 2 of the intervention on number of participants who are abstinent (defined as 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence confirmed with an expired CO of 5 ppm or less) at the intervention year 2 assessment.
The investigators hypothesize that those who used any medication will exhibit higher rates of tobacco abstinence than those who did not use any medications.
To make use of all the data, the hypothesis will be assessed in Cohorts 1 and 2 via analysis of a factorial design.
The indirect effect of CHW and AD interventions on abstinence rates with any TUD medication use as a mediator will be also be assessed.
|
Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
|
Effect of Varenicline Use on Number of Participants Who Are Abstinence at the Intervention Year 2 Assessment in Cohorts 1 and 2
Prazo: Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Effect of use of varenicline during assessments for years 1 and 2 of the intervention on number of participants who are abstinent (defined as 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence confirmed with an expired CO of 5 ppm or less) at the intervention year 2 assessment.
The investigators hypothesize that those who used varenicline will exhibit higher rates of tobacco abstinence than those who did not use any varenicline.
To make use of all the data, the hypothesis will be assessed in Cohorts 1 and 2 via analysis of a factorial design.
The indirect effect of CHW and AD interventions on abstinence rates with varenicline use as a mediator will be also be assessed.
|
Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Single-item Assessment at the Intervention Year 2 Assessment in Cohort 1
Prazo: Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Three pairwise comparisons between usual care (TAU), AD+CHW, and AD for health-related quality of life at the intervention year 2 assessment as assessed with the single-item self-reported Overall Health (SF-1) scale (measured on a 5-point scale from 1 = 'poor' to 5 = 'excellent').
The investigators hypothesize that (1) those who receive AD+CHW will demonstrate improved quality of life compared than those who receive TAU, (2) those who receive AD will demonstrate improved quality of life compared those who received TAU, and (3) those who receive AD+CHW will demonstrate improved quality of life compared than those who received AD.
|
Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life Single-item Assessment at the Intervention Year 2 Assessment in Cohorts 1 and 2
Prazo: Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Comparisons between (1) CHW (pooled over AD+CHW and CHW) and (2) AD (pooled over AD+CHW and AD) compared to usual care (TAU) on health-related quality of life at the intervention year 2 assessment as assessed with the single-item self-reported Overall Health (SF-1) scale (measured on a 5-point scale from 1 = 'poor' to 5 = 'excellent').
The investigators hypothesize that (1) those who receive CHW support will demonstrate improved quality of life compared to those who receive TAU, and (2) those with AD exposure will demonstrate improved quality of life compared to those who received TAU.
To make use of all the data, hypotheses will be assessed in Cohorts 1 and 2 via analysis of a factorial design.
|
Assessment at end of year 2 of intervention
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: A Eden Evins, MD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
14 de julho de 2016
Conclusão Primária (Real)
2 de fevereiro de 2020
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
12 de janeiro de 2021
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
20 de julho de 2016
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
26 de julho de 2016
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
27 de julho de 2016
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
19 de abril de 2022
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
16 de fevereiro de 2022
Última verificação
1 de fevereiro de 2022
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 2016P001036
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
SIM
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .