Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Efficiency of Task Switching and Multi-tasking

24 de setembro de 2018 atualizado por: Jennifer Di Rocco, University of Hawaii

Efficiency of Task Switching and Multi-tasking: Observations of Pediatric Resident Behaviors When Managing Interruptions to Daily Workflow

This study will collect observational data on how well pediatric residents handle interruptions to their daily workflow. Residents will be directly observed during their work day and behaviors will be recorded using an electronic tool that will time-stamp their actions when faced with an interruption. The average time it takes for them to return to their original task(s) after faced with an interruption will be calculated, along with correlations made between their predicted multi-tasking ability, year of training, and additional factors.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

Efficiency of Task Switching and Multi-tasking: Observations of Pediatric Resident Behaviors when Managing Interruptions to Daily Workflow

Jennifer R. Di Rocco, DO, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, JABSOM; Associate Program Director, UH Pediatric Residency Program; Master of Education Candidate, University of Cincinnati/Cincinnati Children's Hospital

Summary of Project Concept:

The daily practice of medicine is fraught with frequent interruptions that a busy clinician must manage appropriately in order to ensure the best patient care possible. Tasks that are urgent and time-sensitive must be prioritized, organized, and balanced with numerous other tasks requiring completion during the day. Physicians must also maintain the necessary flexibility required to adapt to unexpected events that inevitably surface regularly during a busy clinical workday. The ability to expertly manage interruptions may be considered under the umbrella of the "art of medicine," which is not found in textbooks and can be difficult to teach. Additional challenges in this era of limited duty hours include limited patient exposure with less time to develop the skills for effective management of interruptions. Some young clinicians seem to easily triage tasks as they are presented, while others struggle with this role.

Pediatric residents have graded autonomy as they progress through a program, with a steep learning curve in their first year. From an initial dependence on the senior resident and faculty when starting as a new intern to improved ability to independently practice as they near the start of their second year, each intern matures both clinically and professionally at various rates. The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has assigned 21 pediatric milestones that must be reported back to them twice yearly with a resident's progress along the continuum. Milestones describing the degree of medical knowledge, trustworthiness, leadership, teamwork and stress management skills are all required and applicable to the topic of one's ability to manage interruptions appropriately. The description of the "Patient Care 2" milestone, which reads "Organize and prioritize responsibilities to provide patient care that is safe, effective and efficient" addresses the concept of the "optimization of multitasking" in the milestone discussion. This is described as a higher level of clinical achievement in which a physician demonstrates concurrent task completion in a manner ends to a more efficient workflow without compromising patient safety. The complex set of behaviors described by this milestone can be best observed and assessed when a resident has increased responsibility and leadership roles including supervising a team, managing pager calls and admitting new patients simultaneously. Some residents in our program in recent years have struggled in supervisory roles, specifically with this milestone, but some have excelled, despite having less practice than prior decades of trainees. Understanding the factors contributing to how pediatric residents manage interruptions (from "novice" interns to "expert" third year residents) should be helpful towards designing curricula for mastery of these skills in our program and in others across the nation.

Many factors are involved in how physicians manage interruptions, and the positive or negative effects of their management decisions have implications on patient safety and medical errors in the clinical workplace. Observational studies of pediatric residents do not exist in the current literature, nor does a study exist that correlates physicians' ability and quality of interruption management with their overall wellness including their preferred learning styles, aptitudes in dealing with interruptions, sleep debt, and mental strain. Garnering such data and analyzing such variables could provide added guidance and understanding to those residency programs that are struggling to help learners improve in this arena, which is difficult to truly assess until a resident is in a supervisory position with multifactorial responsibilities. If there were a way of predicting aptitude in this skill set early, learners who may not easily manage interruptions could be targeted and practice exercises designed to strengthen this skill set. With this intervention, the transition from an intern to a senior supervising resident may be much smoother. The first step towards creating tools for augmenting performance in the area of managing interruptions gracefully and efficiently is to understand the current factors that are involved in a resident's decision process when faced with interruptions during the daily workflow. An observational study of residents in real time would provide such data and serve as a springboard for future work in creating tools and curricula to assist residents struggling with task management.

Project methods will include IRB approval and recruitment of pediatric residents. Participants will be asked to complete some baseline surveys (which include wellness and sleep inventories) and a multitasking exercise (called the Multitasking Assessment Tool or MTAT). Residents will then be observed multiple times over 1-2 hour time slots when rotating in both the general pediatric wards and emergency department settings by the study leader or by a trained observer, with all behaviors categorized and recorded with time stamps via a portable electronic database time-motion tool. On the day of observation, each participant will complete two short surveys regarding the degree of stress they are feeling that day as well as a log of their previous week's sleep habits.

Tipo de estudo

Observacional

Inscrição (Real)

18

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, Estados Unidos, 96826
        • Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho
  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Método de amostragem

Amostra Não Probabilística

População do estudo

All pediatric residents at the University of Hawai'i Pediatric Residency Program will be recruited as potential participants.

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consenting pediatric residents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-consenting pediatric residents

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

Coortes e Intervenções

Grupo / Coorte
Intervenção / Tratamento
Pediatric Residents
Participating pediatric residents from first postgraduate year (PGY-1) through third postgraduate year (PGY-3) will be observed over a 12 month timeframe.
There are no specific interventions in this study; it is observational only. One could argue that the act of observing the participants may change their behavior (the Hawthorne effect).

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
MTAT score predicting residents who take the least time to return to an original task after an interrupting task
Prazo: Through study completion, up to 1 year
Hypothesis: A lower, more efficient MTAT score will predict the most efficient residents, as defined by taking the least amount of time to manage interruptions as directly observed and recorded through a time-motion tool.
Through study completion, up to 1 year

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Time to return to task after interruption
Prazo: Through study completion, up to 1 year
Hypothesis: Senior level pediatric residents will take less time to return to an original task following an interrupting task as compared to first year residents.
Through study completion, up to 1 year
Self-assigned level of personal wellness affects task-switching efficiency
Prazo: Through study completion, up to 1 year
Hypothesis: Yes, low wellness scores, as individually self-reported on a scale of 0-10 negatively impact task-switching efficiency.
Through study completion, up to 1 year

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Self-reported hours of sleep affects task-switching efficiency
Prazo: Through study completion, up to 1 year
Hypothesis: Yes, lower average hours of sleep, as individually self-reported in hours of sleep each day in the preceding week, negatively impact task-switching efficiency.
Through study completion, up to 1 year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Jennifer R Di Rocco, DO, University of Hawai'i

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de maio de 2016

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de março de 2017

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de março de 2017

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

17 de maio de 2016

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

24 de setembro de 2018

Primeira postagem (Real)

26 de setembro de 2018

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

26 de setembro de 2018

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

24 de setembro de 2018

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2018

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 2015-107

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

INDECISO

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever