Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Many Trauma-affected Youth Face Long Waits for Therapy, Worsening Stress, and Avoidance. CISS, a 90-minute Session Based on Stanford's Cue-Centered Therapy, Offers Coping Tools and Psychoeducation During This Gap. This Pilot Tests CISS's Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact on 30-40 Adolescents. (CISS)

22 de abril de 2026 atualizado por: Victor Carrion, Stanford University

CISS: CCT-Informed Single Session Intervention

Many young people who have experienced traumatic events such as sexual assault, domestic violence, serious accidents, or natural disasters face long waits before they can begin full trauma-focused therapy. During this waiting period, symptoms such as avoidance, anxiety, and distress may worsen, and many youth lose motivation or confidence to start treatment. The Cue-Centered Therapy (CCT)-Informed Single Session Intervention (CISS) was designed to bridge this gap by offering a one-time, 90-minute session that teaches coping and self-understanding skills while youth are still on the waiting list.

This study is a pilot feasibility trial conducted in partnership between Stanford University and the University of Auckland. The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether CISS is a practical, acceptable, and safe intervention for young people aged 13-18 who have been exposed to trauma and are currently waiting for or hesitant to begin full-length therapy within New Zealand Hapai Ora Clinics.

Youth participants will meet once with a trained Hapai Ora clinician who will deliver the 90-minute CISS session. The session combines psychoeducation about trauma cues with skill-building strategies to improve coping, confidence, and readiness to engage in future treatment. Participants will complete short questionnaires before and after the session, and again at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Measures will assess coping self-efficacy, treatment readiness, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and whether participants eventually begin full-length therapy.

The study will recruit approximately 30-40 adolescents across Hapai Ora clinical sites in Auckland, New Zealand. All clinicians providing the intervention are qualified mental-health professionals trained in both CISS and child-safety protocols. Participation involves minimal risk-similar to discussing difficult topics in a supportive therapy session.

Findings from this pilot study will help researchers understand whether CISS can be feasibly and safely delivered within public mental-health services, and whether it shows promise in helping young people build coping skills, reduce avoidance, and increase readiness to start therapy. The results will guide future larger-scale trials and inform the development of single-session, early-intervention approaches for trauma-exposed youth worldwide.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Trauma-exposed youth often face months-long waits before beginning comprehensive trauma-focused therapy, leaving them without structured support during a critical period of need. During these waiting periods, symptoms such as avoidance, anxiety, and hyperarousal may worsen, and many young people lose motivation or confidence to begin care. Brief, single-session interventions (SSIs) have emerged as a promising approach to strengthen coping and treatment engagement among youth unable or unwilling to access longer-term therapy.

The Cue-Centered Therapy (CCT)-Informed Single Session Intervention (CISS) is a 90-minute, structured, one-on-one session derived from the evidence-based Cue-Centered Therapy model developed at Stanford University's Early Life Stress and Resilience Program. CISS distills key CCT components-psychoeducation about trauma cues, development of insight into avoidance patterns, and flexible coping skill practice-into a single, accessible format designed to serve as a "bridge-to-care" for youth awaiting therapy.

This pilot feasibility trial will evaluate whether CISS can be feasibly and safely delivered to adolescents (ages 13-18) who have been exposed to trauma and are currently on Hapai Ora waitlists in New Zealand. The study is a collaboration between Stanford University and the University of Auckland.

Primary objectives:

  • Assess the feasibility and acceptability of CISS delivery within routine Hapai Ora workflows.
  • Examine pre- to post-intervention changes in coping self-efficacy, treatment readiness, and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSD symptoms).
  • Explore treatment uptake and engagement in full-length trauma therapy following participation.

Approximately 30-40 adolescents will be recruited through collaborating Hapai Ora sites. After informed consent or assent, participants will complete baseline questionnaires, attend a single 90-minute CISS session with a trained clinician, and complete post-session, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up assessments. All measures are brief, self-reported, and non-invasive. Core instruments include:

  • Children's Revised Impact of Event Scale (CRIES-8): measuring posttraumatic stress symptom severity (primary PTSD outcome)
  • Motivation for Youth Treatment Scale - Readiness Subscale (MYTS-R): measuring treatment readiness

    -.Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Youth, Trauma-Focused (CEQ-Y-TF): measuring perceived credibility and expectancy of benefit

  • General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ): measuring coping self-efficacy and help-seeking intentions

The study uses a single-group, pre-post feasibility design. Sessions are delivered by licensed Hapai Oraclinicians (e.g., psychologists, psychiatrists, nurses, or social workers) trained in CISS through Stanford- and Auckland-led workshops. Fidelity is monitored through checklists and optional video review for supervision. Data will be stored securely on Stanford Medicine's Qualtrics and Box servers, with all identifiable information removed prior to analysis.

Risks are minimal and limited to temporary emotional discomfort when discussing past trauma. All clinicians follow standard crisis-management and child-safety procedures, and participants have access to ongoing clinical support through Hapai Ora. No invasive procedures or medications are involved.

The anticipated study duration is from December 2025 to November 2028. Primary data collection (including 6-month follow-ups) is expected to conclude by May 2028. Findings will inform the design of a larger randomized controlled trial and contribute to international efforts to improve early trauma intervention accessibility within youth mental-health systems.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

40

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

  • Nome: Elizabeth Santana, BA, Political Science
  • Número de telefone: 6507213582
  • E-mail: eliz5@stanford.edu

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho
  • Adulto

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 13 to 18 years old (adolescents).

Trauma Exposure: History of chronic or single-event trauma (e.g., interpersonal violence, serious accidents, natural disaster) as documented in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) intake records.

Service Status: Currently on a CAMHS waitlist for trauma-focused therapy, or self-referred but hesitant to begin multi-session treatment.

Capacity and Consent: Ability to provide informed assent (ages 13-15 with parental permission) or informed consent (ages 16-18).

Exclusion Criteria:

Current Trauma Treatment: Actively engaged in any form of trauma-focused psychotherapy (e.g., TF-CBT, EMDR, CCT) at the time of enrollment.

Severe Cognitive Impairment: Intellectual disability or cognitive impairment (e.g., IQ < 70) that precludes comprehension of psychoeducational material or completion of self-report questionnaires.

Acute Suicidality: Endorsement of imminent self-harm or suicide risk (e.g., PHQ-9 item 9 ≥ 2) during screening that necessitates immediate crisis management rather than study participation.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Cuidados de suporte
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Outro: Cue-Centered Therapy (CCT)-Informed Single Session Intervention (CISS)
Participants will receive a single 90-minute CISS session, a structured, therapist-led program based on Cue-Centered Therapy (CCT). The session combines psychoeducation about trauma cues, guided reflection on avoidance and stress reactions, and skills practice to strengthen coping and treatment readiness. Sessions are delivered individually by trained mental-health clinicians (psychologists, psychiatrists, nurses, or social workers) working in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). All clinicians complete CISS training and fidelity supervision before implementation.Each youth completes baseline questionnaires before the session, a brief post-session survey, and follow-up assessments at 3 and 6 months. No control group or randomization is used in this pilot feasibility design.
Cue-Centered Therapy (CCT)-Informed Single Session Intervention (CISS) Arm Description: Participants will receive a single 90-minute CISS session, a structured, therapist-led program based on Cue-Centered Therapy (CCT). The session combines psychoeducation about trauma cues, guided reflection on avoidance and stress reactions, and skills practice to strengthen coping and treatment readiness. Sessions are delivered individually by trained mental-health clinicians (psychologists, psychiatrists, nurses, or social workers) working in Hapai Ora clinics. All clinicians complete CISS training and fidelity supervision before implementation.Each youth completes baseline questionnaires before the session, a brief post-session survey, and follow-up assessments at 3 and 6 months. No control group or randomization is used in this pilot feasibility design.
Outros nomes:
  • Single Session Intervention

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Feasibility of Implementing CISS within CAMHS Services
Prazo: From the study start in June 2026 for 12 weeks
Feasibility will be evaluated using quantitative indices, including recruitment rate. Recruitment feasibility will be defined as the proportion of eligible participants who consent and complete the CISS session. Implementation feasibility will be indicated by the proportion of clinicians completing training and achieving ≥85% fidelity on observed sessions. Data will be summarized descriptively to determine whether CISS can be integrated into routine Hapai Ora workflows.
From the study start in June 2026 for 12 weeks
Feasibility of Implementing CISS within CAMHS Services
Prazo: From the study start in June 2026 for 12 weeks
Feasibility will be evaluated using quantitative indices, including session completion rate. Recruitment feasibility will be defined as the proportion of eligible participants who consent and complete the CISS session. Implementation feasibility will be indicated by the proportion of clinicians completing training and achieving ≥85% fidelity on observed sessions. Data will be summarized descriptively to determine whether CISS can be integrated into routine Hapai Ora workflows.
From the study start in June 2026 for 12 weeks
Feasibility of Implementing CISS within CAMHS Services
Prazo: From the study start in June 2026 for 12 weeks
Feasibility will be evaluated using quantitative indices, including follow-up completion rate. Recruitment feasibility will be defined as the proportion of eligible participants who consent and complete the CISS session. Implementation feasibility will be indicated by the proportion of clinicians completing training and achieving ≥85% fidelity on observed sessions. Data will be summarized descriptively to determine whether CISS can be integrated into routine Hapai Ora workflows.
From the study start in June 2026 for 12 weeks
Feasibility of Implementing CISS within CAMHS Services
Prazo: From the study start in June 2026 for 12 weeks
Feasibility will be evaluated using quantitative indices, including clinician fidelity scores. Recruitment feasibility will be defined as the proportion of eligible participants who consent and complete the CISS session. Implementation feasibility will be indicated by the proportion of clinicians completing training and achieving ≥85% fidelity on observed sessions. Data will be summarized descriptively to determine whether CISS can be integrated into routine Hapai Ora workflows.
From the study start in June 2026 for 12 weeks
Acceptability of CISS to Youth Participants and Clinicians
Prazo: Immediately post-session
Acceptability will be assessed through post-session surveys completed by youth and clinicians. Youth will rate satisfaction using 5-point Likert scales (1 = Not at all, 5 = Extremely). Clinicians will complete a brief acceptability checklist evaluating ease of delivery, perceived fit with clinical practice, and satisfaction with supervision. Acceptability will be operationalized as ≥80% of youth and clinicians endorsing ratings of 4 or higher on satisfaction and helpfulness items.
Immediately post-session
Acceptability of CISS to Youth Participants and Clinicians
Prazo: Immediately post-session
Acceptability will be assessed through post-session surveys completed by youth and clinicians. Youth will rate perceived helpfulness using 5-point Likert scales (1 = Not at all, 5 = Extremely). Clinicians will complete a brief acceptability checklist evaluating ease of delivery, perceived fit with clinical practice, and satisfaction with supervision. Acceptability will be operationalized as ≥80% of youth and clinicians endorsing ratings of 4 or higher on satisfaction and helpfulness items.
Immediately post-session
Acceptability of CISS to Youth Participants and Clinicians
Prazo: Immediately post-session
Acceptability will be assessed through post-session surveys completed by youth and clinicians. Youth will rate the likelihood of recommending the session using 5-point Likert scales (1 = Not at all, 5 = Extremely). Clinicians will complete a brief acceptability checklist evaluating ease of delivery, perceived fit with clinical practice, and satisfaction with supervision. Acceptability will be operationalized as ≥80% of youth and clinicians endorsing ratings of 4 or higher on satisfaction and helpfulness items.
Immediately post-session
Change in Treatment Readiness
Prazo: Baseline (pre-session), immediate post-session, 3 months, 6 months
The Motivation for Youth Treatment Scale - Readiness Subscale (MYTS-R) measures adolescents' readiness and motivation to engage in therapy. The MYTS-R consists of 8 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 5 ("Strongly agree"). Higher scores indicate greater readiness to participate in therapy. Mean changes in MYTS-R scores will be analyzed from baseline (pre-session) to immediate post-session, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups.
Baseline (pre-session), immediate post-session, 3 months, 6 months
Change in Coping Self-Efficacy and Help-Seeking Intentions
Prazo: Baseline (pre-session), 3 months, 6 months
The General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ) evaluates adolescents' perceived coping ability and likelihood of seeking help for emotional or mental-health problems. Items are rated on a 7-point scale (1 = extremely unlikely, 7 = extremely likely). Higher scores indicate stronger coping self-efficacy and help-seeking intentions. Mean changes from baseline to follow-up will assess improvement in self-efficacy and help-seeking behavior.
Baseline (pre-session), 3 months, 6 months
Change in Perceived Credibility and Expectancy for Treatment
Prazo: Baseline (pre-session), immediate post-session
The Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Youth, Trauma-Focused (CEQ-Y-TF) measures youths' perceptions of the intervention's credibility and their expectations of benefit. Six items are rated on 9-point Likert scales, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived credibility and expectancy. Mean CEQ-Y-TF scores will be compared between baseline and immediate post-session to assess change in perceived treatment plausibility and anticipated effectiveness.
Baseline (pre-session), immediate post-session

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms
Prazo: Baseline (pre-session), 3 months, 6 months
The Children's Revised Impact of Event Scale - 8 item (CRIES-8) measures posttraumatic stress symptom severity (intrusion, avoidance, and arousal). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0 = Not at all, 5 = Often). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Mean total CRIES-8 score changes will be evaluated from baseline to 3- and 6-month follow-ups as an exploratory clinical outcome.
Baseline (pre-session), 3 months, 6 months
Mean Change in School Achievement
Prazo: Three time points: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Description: School achievement was assessed with the Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised Spelling and Math scale score. The spelling subscale was a phonetic test that assessed the degree to which students could encode sounds into written words. The math computation subscale measured students' ability to identify numbers, count, and solve written computational problems. The scores are summed across the subscales and scaled according to the standardized score. A higher score reflects a higher performance. Changes in scores will be assessed between all time points.
Three time points: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Victor Carrion, MD, Stanford University
  • Investigador principal: Melody Kim, PHD (G4), University of Aukland

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de junho de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

31 de maio de 2028

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

30 de novembro de 2028

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

8 de dezembro de 2025

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

22 de abril de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

30 de abril de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

30 de abril de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

22 de abril de 2026

Última verificação

1 de abril de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever