Promoting Walking Among Older Adults Through Affective Communication and Step-Monitoring (NOSTEP)
15 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: Patrizia Catellani, Catholic University, Italy
Self-Continuity Messages and Step-Monitoring to Promote Walking Among Older Adults: Protocol of a 4-Arm Randomised Controlled Trial
Physical inactivity increases substantially after age 60 and represents a major public health challenge in older adults, as it is linked to increased risk of functional and cognitive decline and aging problems. Walking is one of the most accessible and recommended forms of light-to-moderate physical activity for this population. However, promoting sustained engagement in walking remains difficult, as traditional informational approaches often fail to activate personally meaningful motivations.
This study tests whether persuasive affective messages can promote walking by leveraging self-continuity, meaning the use of autobiographical memory to maintain the sense of being the same person across time and contexts, connecting the past, present, and future self. Self-continuity is associated with psychological resources such as self-esteem, self-efficacy, and a sense of meaning in life. The affective mechanism that sustains self-continuity is nostalgia: both promote emotional and behavioral regulation and support goal achievement. Building on this framework, the present trial examines whether activating feelings of self-continuity and positive nostalgic memories can strengthen older adults' motivation to engage in walking behavior.
In addition, the study investigates whether combining self-continuity messaging with a self-regulation strategy (daily step monitoring) enhances intervention effectiveness. Self-monitoring is a well-established behavioral technique that supports goal pursuit by increasing awareness and feedback.
Using a 4-arm randomised controlled factorial design, the study compares the effects of self-continuity messages, step-monitoring reminders, their combination, and an active control condition on walking behaviour and its psychological determinants.
A national sample of 1,000 Italian adults aged 65-74, recruited through a certified panel provider (Ipsos) and balanced for age, gender, and geographic region, will be randomly assigned to one of the four conditions. All participants will receive one message per day through a mobile application over a 14-day period. Participants in the step-monitoring conditions will also be asked to track and report their daily step count using a pedometer application. Behavioral, psychological, and process measures will be collected at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up.
The study therefore aims to provide experimental evidence on the role of self-continuity as a motivational driver of health behaviour change, and to clarify whether combining affective and self-regulatory strategies enhances intervention effectiveness in older adults.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Recrutamento
Condições
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Estimado)
1000
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Patrizia Catellani, PhD in Social Psychology
- Número de telefone: 393356741468
- E-mail: patrizia.catellani@unicatt.it
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Valentina Carfora, PhD in Social Psychology
- Número de telefone: 393338569908
- E-mail: valentina.carfora@unicatt.it
Locais de estudo
-
-
Milan
-
Milan, Milan, Itália, 20123
- Recrutamento
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (Milan)
-
Contato:
- Patrizia Catellani, PhD in Social Psychology
- Número de telefone: 393356741468
- E-mail: patrizia.catellani@unicatt.it
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Sim
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 65 and 74 years
- Willingness and ability to install and use the mobile applications required for study participation
- Sufficient proficiency in the Italian language to understand study materials and complete the questionnaires.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Physical disabilities or medical conditions that preclude engagement in light to moderate physical activity, specifically:
- medical advice or prescription prohibiting engagement in light to moderate physical activity, assessed via a close-ended screening question;
- positive screening on a study specific close-ended question assessing ability to perform physical activity;
- positive screening on the adapted revised Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (rPAR-Q), indicating that participant may be unsafe.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição fatorial
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Outro: Control
Participants assigned to this arm will receive daily messages about the benefits of recommended daily water intake via the PsyMe app over 14 days.
|
The Day 1 introductory message presents a daily water-intake goal consistent with standard recommendations and informs participants that subsequent messages describe the benefits of adequate hydration.
Participants will be encouraged to pursue the goal according to their individual capabilities.
Messages delivered from Day 2 to Day 13 provide brief information about different beneficial effects of adequate water intake and link hydration to each outcome using counterfactual formulations (e.g., "If you drink the recommended amount of water today, you may support your energy levels and help prevent lapses in concentration").
Message openings vary and include exclamatory statements, memory prompts, or rhetorical questions.
The Day 14 message concludes the intervention.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Step-monitoring
Participants assigned to this arm will receive daily reminders to monitor and record their step count through a step-tracking application via the PsyMe app over 14 days.
|
The Day 1 introductory message presents a daily walking goal consistent with WHO recommendations and informs participants that subsequent messages prompt them to monitor their daily step count.
Participants will be encouraged to pursue the physical activity goal according to their individual capabilities.
Messages delivered from Day 2 to Day 13 provide reminders to monitor step counts throughout the day using the pedometer app and to record the total number of daily steps in PsyMe at the end of the day (e.g., "During the day, monitor your step count using the pedometer app.
This evening, record the total number of steps in the app.").
The Day 14 message concludes the intervention.
|
|
Experimental: Self-continuity + Step-monitoring
Participants assigned to this arm will receive daily messages via the PsyMe app over 14 days.
These messages combine prompts recalling relevant past experiences and promoting walking behavior with reminders to monitor and record their daily step count.
|
The Day 1 introductory message presents a daily walking goal consistent with WHO recommendations and informs participants that subsequent messages describe the benefits of walking.
Participants will be encouraged to pursue the physical activity goal according to their individual capabilities.
Messages delivered from Day 2 to Day 13 aim to activate different positive nostalgic experiences related to walking and movement, including past memories, emotions, bodily sensations, personal values, and self-concepts.
The messages link walking behaviour to such positive experiences using counterfactual formulations (e.g., "If you walk a little more today, you may reconnect with sensations your body knows well.").
Message openings vary and include exclamatory statements, memory prompts, or rhetorical questions.
The Day 14 message concludes the intervention.
The Day 1 introductory message presents a daily walking goal consistent with WHO recommendations and informs participants that subsequent messages prompt them to monitor their daily step count.
Participants will be encouraged to pursue the physical activity goal according to their individual capabilities.
Messages delivered from Day 2 to Day 13 provide reminders to monitor step counts throughout the day using the pedometer app and to record the total number of daily steps in PsyMe at the end of the day (e.g., "During the day, monitor your step count using the pedometer app.
This evening, record the total number of steps in the app.").
The Day 14 message concludes the intervention.
|
|
Experimental: Self-continuity
Participants assigned to this arm will receive daily messages via the PsyMe app over 14 days.
These messages are designed to prompt recall of personally relevant past experiences and to promote walking behavior.
|
The Day 1 introductory message presents a daily walking goal consistent with WHO recommendations and informs participants that subsequent messages describe the benefits of walking.
Participants will be encouraged to pursue the physical activity goal according to their individual capabilities.
Messages delivered from Day 2 to Day 13 aim to activate different positive nostalgic experiences related to walking and movement, including past memories, emotions, bodily sensations, personal values, and self-concepts.
The messages link walking behaviour to such positive experiences using counterfactual formulations (e.g., "If you walk a little more today, you may reconnect with sensations your body knows well.").
Message openings vary and include exclamatory statements, memory prompts, or rhetorical questions.
The Day 14 message concludes the intervention.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Reported Walking Frequency and Duration at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Assessed by International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Version (IPAQ).
Higher scores (mean daily time spent in walking activities, number of days per week with walking activity, and mean time spent in walking activities multiplied by the number of days per week with walking activity) indicate greater self-reported walking activity over the past week and in a usual week.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Reported Walking Intensity at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Assessed by International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Version (IPAQ).
Higher scores indicate greater self-reported walking intensity over the past week and in a usual week, with 3 ordinal response options: slow, moderate, and vigorous intensity.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Daily Step Count at 2-Week Post-Intervention as Measured Via Pedometer App
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Higher self-reported step counts indicate greater walking activity over the past week and in a usual week.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Attitude toward Walking at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Measured using an ad-hoc 7-point semantic differential scale assessing anticipated attitude toward walking in the next two weeks, across six bipolar adjective pairs.
Higher scores are associated with more positive attitudes toward walking.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Intention to Walk at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Measured using an ad hoc 7-point Likert scale comprising 3 items and assessing intention to walk as much as possible over the next two weeks.
Responses range from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher values indicating stronger intention to walk.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Efficacy to Walk at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Measured using a 12-item scale adapted from the Self-efficacy to Regulate Exercise scale (Carfora et al., 2022) to assess confidence in being able to walk as much as possible over the next two weeks under a variety of challenging circumstances.
Responses are given on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy to walk.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Anticipated Positive Emotions Toward Walking at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Evaluated using an ad-hoc 6-item scale assessing anticipated positive emotions associated with walking as much as possible over the next two weeks.
Responses are given on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher scores indicating stronger anticipated positive emotions toward walking.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Anticipated Negative Emotions Toward Walking at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Evaluated using an ad-hoc 6-item scale assessing anticipated negative emotions associated with not walking as much as possible over the next two weeks.
Responses are given on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher scores indicating stronger anticipated negative emotions toward not walking.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Reported Daily Water Intake at 2-Week Post-Intervention
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Measured using an ad-hoc close-ended single-item measure assessing usual number of glasses of water consumed in an ordinary day.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Attitude toward Water Intake at 2-Week Post-Intervention
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Measured using an ad-hoc 7-point semantic differential scale assessing anticipated attitude toward drinking at least 2 liters of water per day over the next two weeks, across six bipolar adjective pairs.
Higher scores are associated with more positive attitudes toward drinking water.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Intention to Drink Water at 2-Week Post-Intervention
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Measured using an ad hoc 7-point Likert scale comprising 3 items and assessing intention to drink at least 2 liters of water per day over the next two weeks.
Responses range from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher values indicating stronger intention to drink water.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Reported Sedentary Behaviour Duration at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Assessed by International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Version (IPAQ).
Higher self-reported minutes spent in sedentary activities indicate greater sedentary behaviour in a usual week.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Reported Light Physical Activity Frequency and Duration at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Adapted from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Version (IPAQ), specifically for light physical activity.
Higher scores (mean daily time spent in light physical activities, number of days per week with light physical activity, and mean daily time multiplied by the number of days per week with light physical activity) indicate greater self-reported light physical activity in a usual week.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Reported Moderate Physical Activity Frequency and Duration at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Assessed by International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Version (IPAQ).
Higher scores (mean daily time spent in moderate physical activities, number of days per week with moderate physical activity, and mean daily time multiplied by the number of days per week with moderate physical activity) indicate greater self-reported moderate physical activity in a usual week.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Reported Vigorous Physical Activity Frequency and Duration at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Assessed by International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Version (IPAQ).
Higher scores (mean daily time spent in vigorous physical activities, number of days per week with vigorous physical activity, and mean daily time multiplied by the number of days per week with vigorous physical activity) indicate greater self-reported vigorous physical activity in a usual week.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Pedometer Usage and Usage Frequency (Past Week) at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Measured using a study-specific single item with 5 ordinal response options.
Higher scores indicate more frequent mean daily use of the pedometer app/device.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Outras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in Self-Continuity at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Assessed using a 4-item scale translated from the Self-Continuity Index to measure perceived continuity and stability between past and present self.
Responses are given on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher scores indicating greater self-continuity.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in State Nostalgia at 2-Week Post-Intervention and 4-Week Follow-up
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
Assessed using a study-adapted 3-item scale to measure recent feelings of nostalgia.
The scale asks participants to indicate their agreement with statements such as "During the past week, I have felt rather nostalgic."
Responses are given on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher scores indicate greater state nostalgia.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Temporal Comparison at 2-Week Post-Intervention
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Assessed using a 11-item scale translated from the Measure of Temporal Comparison Orientation to assess how frequently and intensely a person engages in temporal comparisons.
Responses are given on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher scores indicating greater temporal comparison proneness.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Attitudes Toward Aging at 2-Week Post-Intervention
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Assessed using a study-adapted 4-item scale based on the Positive View of Aging subscale of the AgeCog scale of Ongoing Development to measure positive attitudes toward aging.
Responses are given on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher values reflecting more positive attitudes toward aging.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in Psychological Well-Being at 2-Week Post-Intervention
Prazo: Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Assessed using the Italian translation of the 5-item Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale to measure psychological well-being over the past two weeks.
Responses are given on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree), with higher values reflecting greater psychological well-being.
|
Baseline and 2 weeks
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Patrizia Catellani, Social Psychology, Catholic University, Italy
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- O'Donovan G, Blazevich AJ, Boreham C, Cooper AR, Crank H, Ekelund U, Fox KR, Gately P, Giles-Corti B, Gill JM, Hamer M, McDermott I, Murphy M, Mutrie N, Reilly JJ, Saxton JM, Stamatakis E. The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. J Sports Sci. 2010 Apr;28(6):573-91. doi: 10.1080/02640411003671212.
- Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
- Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput JP, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, van der Ploeg HP, Wari V, Willumsen JF. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
- Conner M, Rhodes RE, Morris B, McEachan R, Lawton R. Changing exercise through targeting affective or cognitive attitudes. Psychol Health. 2011 Feb;26(2):133-49. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.531570.
- Williams DM, Evans DR. Current Emotion Research in Health Behavior Science. Emot Rev. 2014 Jul;6(3):277-287. doi: 10.1177/1754073914523052. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
- Larsen RT, Christensen J, Juhl CB, Andersen HB, Langberg H. Physical activity monitors to enhance amount of physical activity in older adults - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2019 May 4;16:7. doi: 10.1186/s11556-019-0213-6. eCollection 2019.
- Withall J, Stathi A, Davis M, Coulson J, Thompson JL, Fox KR. Objective indicators of physical activity and sedentary time and associations with subjective well-being in adults aged 70 and over. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jan 2;11(1):643-56. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110100643.
- Williamson C, Baker G, Mutrie N, Niven A, Kelly P. Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 15;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00954-3.
- Varma VR, Dey D, Leroux A, Di J, Urbanek J, Xiao L, Zipunnikov V. Re-evaluating the effect of age on physical activity over the lifespan. Prev Med. 2017 Aug;101:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
- Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Papathomas A, Foster J, Quested E, Ntoumanis N. "Shall We Dance?" Older Adults' Perspectives on the Feasibility of a Dance Intervention for Cognitive Function. J Aging Phys Act. 2018 Oct 1;26(4):553-560. doi: 10.1123/japa.2017-0203. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
- Subramaniam P, Singh DKA, Al-Shahrani HF, Hammad MA, Lim EV, Hoh XJ, Tay KW, Alavi K. Effects of combined group reminiscence and exercise therapy on psychological wellbeing and functional fitness among older adults with dementia. Sci Rep. 2025 Nov 27;15(1):42449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-26503-1.
- Morris JN, Hardman AE. Walking to health. Sports Med. 1997 May;23(5):306-32. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199723050-00004.
- Morris B, Lawton R, McEachan R, Hurling R, Conner M. Changing self-reported physical activity using different types of affectively and cognitively framed health messages, in a student population. Psychol Health Med. 2016;21(2):198-207. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2014.997762. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
- Hertzog C, Kramer AF, Wilson RS, Lindenberger U. Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Oct;9(1):1-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
- Fleury J, Sedikides C, Wildschut T, Coon DW, Komnenich P. Feeling Safe and Nostalgia in Healthy Aging. Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 4;13:843051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.843051. eCollection 2022.
- Catellani P, Biella M, Carfora V, Nardone A, Brischigiaro L, Manera MR, Piastra M. A theory-based and data-driven approach to promoting physical activity through message-based interventions. Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 27;14:1200304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1200304. eCollection 2023.
- Carfora V, Biella M, Catellani P. Affective components in promoting physical activity: A randomized controlled trial of message framing. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 12;13:968109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968109. eCollection 2022.
- Carfora V, Catellani P. The Effect of Persuasive Messages in Promoting Home-Based Physical Activity During COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 1;12:644050. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644050. eCollection 2021.
- Biondolillo MJ, Pillemer DB. Using memories to motivate future behaviour: an experimental exercise intervention. Memory. 2015;23(3):390-402. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.889709. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
- Biondolillo MJ, Carr KA, Wojcik K, Curry DC, Epstein LH. Effects of Episodic Memory Recall on Reinforcing Value of Physical Activity. Psychol Rep. 2025 Oct;128(5):3526-3543. doi: 10.1177/00332941231210213. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
- Hallford DJ, Mellor D, Cummins RA. Adaptive autobiographical memory in younger and older adults: the indirect association of integrative and instrumental reminiscence with depressive symptoms. Memory. 2013;21(4):444-57. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.736523. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
- Adler JM, Lodi-Smith J, Philippe FL, Houle I. The Incremental Validity of Narrative Identity in Predicting Well-Being: A Review of the Field and Recommendations for the Future. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 May;20(2):142-75. doi: 10.1177/1088868315585068. Epub 2015 May 12.
- Hallford DJ, Ricarte JJ, Hermans D. Perceived Autobiographical Coherence Predicts Depressive Symptoms Over Time Through Positive Self-Concept. Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 18;12:625429. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625429. eCollection 2021.
- Bluck, S., Alea, N., Habermas, T., & Rubin, D.C. (2005). A tale of three functions: The self-reported uses of autobiographical memory. Social Cognition, 23(1). pp. 91-117.
- Sedikides, C., & Wildschut, T. (2018). Finding Meaning in Nostalgia. Review of General Psychology, 22(1), 48-61.
- Soraci P, Bevan N, Griffiths MD, Pisanti R, Servidio R, Ferrari A, Di Bernardo C, Pakpour AH. The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): an Italian validation using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 21;12(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02177-8.
- Wurm S, Diehl M, Kornadt AE, Westerhof GJ, Wahl HW. How do views on aging affect health outcomes in adulthood and late life? Explanations for an established connection. Dev Rev. 2017 Dec;46:27-43. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
- Namikawa T. [Individual difference in making temporal comparisons: development of Temporal Comparison Orientation Scale]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2011 Feb;81(6):593-601. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.81.593. Japanese.
- Sedikides C., Wildschut T., Routledge C., and Arndt J. (2015) Nostalgia counteracts self-discontinuity and restores self-continuity, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 45, 52-61, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2073.
- Wildschut T, Sedikides C, Arndt J, Routledge C. Nostalgia: content, triggers, functions. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):975-993. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.975.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
29 de junho de 2026
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
1 de outubro de 2026
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
1 de outubro de 2026
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
30 de abril de 2026
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
30 de abril de 2026
Primeira postagem (Real)
6 de maio de 2026
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
17 de setembro de 2026
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
15 de setembro de 2026
Última verificação
1 de junho de 2026
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 6069838_48_26
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
SIM
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
They will be made available before
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .